Toshiya Inada, Yuta Tanabe, Yuji Fukaya, Kazuyoshi Ogasawara, Nobutomo Yamamoto
{"title":"基于算法的评级系统评估抗精神病药物诱发的颈肌张力障碍的严重程度","authors":"Toshiya Inada, Yuta Tanabe, Yuji Fukaya, Kazuyoshi Ogasawara, Nobutomo Yamamoto","doi":"10.4088/jcp.23m14929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The severity of antipsychotic-induced cervical dystonia has traditionally been evaluated visually. However, recent advances in information technology made quantification possible in this field through the introduction of engineering methodologies like machine learning.\nMethods: This study was conducted from June 2021 to March 2023. Psychiatrists rated the severity of cervical dystonia into 4 levels (0: none, 1: minimal, 2: mild, and 3: moderate) for 101 videoclips, recorded from 87 psychiatric patients receiving antipsychotics. The Face Mesh function of the open-source framework MediaPipe was employed to calculate the tilt angles of anterocollis or retrocollis, laterocollis, and torticollis. These were calculated to examine the range of tilt angles for the 4 levels of severity of the different types of cervical dystonia.\nResults: The tilt angles calculated using Face Mesh for each level of dystonia were 0° ≤ θ < 6° for none, 6° ≤ θ < 11° for minimal, 11° ≤ θ < 25° for mild, and 25° ≤ θ for moderate laterocollis; 0° ≤ θ < 11° for none, 11° ≤ θ < 18° for minimal, 18° ≤ θ <25° for mild, and 25° ≤ θ for moderate anterocollis or retrocollis; and 0° ≤ θ < 9° for none, 9° ≤ θ < 17° for minimal, 17° ≤ θ < 32° for mild, and 32° ≤ θ for moderate torticollis.\nConclusion: While further validation with new cases is needed, the range of tilt angles in this study could provide a standard for future artificial intelligence devices for cervical dystonia.","PeriodicalId":516853,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"51 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severity of Antipsychotic-Induced Cervical Dystonia Assessed by the Algorithm-Based Rating System.\",\"authors\":\"Toshiya Inada, Yuta Tanabe, Yuji Fukaya, Kazuyoshi Ogasawara, Nobutomo Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/jcp.23m14929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The severity of antipsychotic-induced cervical dystonia has traditionally been evaluated visually. However, recent advances in information technology made quantification possible in this field through the introduction of engineering methodologies like machine learning.\\nMethods: This study was conducted from June 2021 to March 2023. Psychiatrists rated the severity of cervical dystonia into 4 levels (0: none, 1: minimal, 2: mild, and 3: moderate) for 101 videoclips, recorded from 87 psychiatric patients receiving antipsychotics. The Face Mesh function of the open-source framework MediaPipe was employed to calculate the tilt angles of anterocollis or retrocollis, laterocollis, and torticollis. These were calculated to examine the range of tilt angles for the 4 levels of severity of the different types of cervical dystonia.\\nResults: The tilt angles calculated using Face Mesh for each level of dystonia were 0° ≤ θ < 6° for none, 6° ≤ θ < 11° for minimal, 11° ≤ θ < 25° for mild, and 25° ≤ θ for moderate laterocollis; 0° ≤ θ < 11° for none, 11° ≤ θ < 18° for minimal, 18° ≤ θ <25° for mild, and 25° ≤ θ for moderate anterocollis or retrocollis; and 0° ≤ θ < 9° for none, 9° ≤ θ < 17° for minimal, 17° ≤ θ < 32° for mild, and 32° ≤ θ for moderate torticollis.\\nConclusion: While further validation with new cases is needed, the range of tilt angles in this study could provide a standard for future artificial intelligence devices for cervical dystonia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"51 29\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.23m14929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.23m14929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Severity of Antipsychotic-Induced Cervical Dystonia Assessed by the Algorithm-Based Rating System.
Background: The severity of antipsychotic-induced cervical dystonia has traditionally been evaluated visually. However, recent advances in information technology made quantification possible in this field through the introduction of engineering methodologies like machine learning.
Methods: This study was conducted from June 2021 to March 2023. Psychiatrists rated the severity of cervical dystonia into 4 levels (0: none, 1: minimal, 2: mild, and 3: moderate) for 101 videoclips, recorded from 87 psychiatric patients receiving antipsychotics. The Face Mesh function of the open-source framework MediaPipe was employed to calculate the tilt angles of anterocollis or retrocollis, laterocollis, and torticollis. These were calculated to examine the range of tilt angles for the 4 levels of severity of the different types of cervical dystonia.
Results: The tilt angles calculated using Face Mesh for each level of dystonia were 0° ≤ θ < 6° for none, 6° ≤ θ < 11° for minimal, 11° ≤ θ < 25° for mild, and 25° ≤ θ for moderate laterocollis; 0° ≤ θ < 11° for none, 11° ≤ θ < 18° for minimal, 18° ≤ θ <25° for mild, and 25° ≤ θ for moderate anterocollis or retrocollis; and 0° ≤ θ < 9° for none, 9° ≤ θ < 17° for minimal, 17° ≤ θ < 32° for mild, and 32° ≤ θ for moderate torticollis.
Conclusion: While further validation with new cases is needed, the range of tilt angles in this study could provide a standard for future artificial intelligence devices for cervical dystonia.