基于 RF-BOA、AdaBoost-BOA、GBoost-BOA 和 ERT-BOA 混合模型的岩石破碎预测性能评估

Junjie Zhao, Diyuan Li, Jian Zhou, D. J. Armaghani, Aohui Zhou
{"title":"基于 RF-BOA、AdaBoost-BOA、GBoost-BOA 和 ERT-BOA 混合模型的岩石破碎预测性能评估","authors":"Junjie Zhao, Diyuan Li, Jian Zhou, D. J. Armaghani, Aohui Zhou","doi":"10.1002/dug2.12089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rock fragmentation is an important indicator for assessing the quality of blasting operations. However, accurate prediction of rock fragmentation after blasting is challenging due to the complicated blasting parameters and rock properties. For this reason, optimized by the Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA), four hybrid machine learning models, including random forest, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, and extremely randomized trees, were developed in this study. A total of 102 data sets with seven input parameters (spacing‐to‐burden ratio, hole depth‐to‐burden ratio, burden‐to‐hole diameter ratio, stemming length‐to‐burden ratio, powder factor, in situ block size, and elastic modulus) and one output parameter (rock fragment mean size, X50) were adopted to train and validate the predictive models. The root mean square error (RMSE), the mean absolute error (MAE), and the coefficient of determination () were used as the evaluation metrics. The evaluation results demonstrated that the hybrid models showed superior performance than the standalone models. The hybrid model consisting of gradient boosting and BOA (GBoost‐BOA) achieved the best prediction results compared with the other hybrid models, with the highest R2 value of 0.96 and the smallest values of RMSE and MAE of 0.03 and 0.02, respectively. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis was carried out to study the effects of input variables on rock fragmentation. In situ block size (XB), elastic modulus (E), and stemming length‐to‐burden ratio (T/B) were set as the main influencing factors. The proposed hybrid model provided a reliable prediction result and thus could be considered an alternative approach for rock fragment prediction in mining engineering.","PeriodicalId":100363,"journal":{"name":"Deep Underground Science and Engineering","volume":"1 s1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of rock fragmentation prediction based on RF‐BOA, AdaBoost‐BOA, GBoost‐BOA, and ERT‐BOA hybrid models\",\"authors\":\"Junjie Zhao, Diyuan Li, Jian Zhou, D. J. Armaghani, Aohui Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dug2.12089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rock fragmentation is an important indicator for assessing the quality of blasting operations. However, accurate prediction of rock fragmentation after blasting is challenging due to the complicated blasting parameters and rock properties. For this reason, optimized by the Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA), four hybrid machine learning models, including random forest, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, and extremely randomized trees, were developed in this study. A total of 102 data sets with seven input parameters (spacing‐to‐burden ratio, hole depth‐to‐burden ratio, burden‐to‐hole diameter ratio, stemming length‐to‐burden ratio, powder factor, in situ block size, and elastic modulus) and one output parameter (rock fragment mean size, X50) were adopted to train and validate the predictive models. The root mean square error (RMSE), the mean absolute error (MAE), and the coefficient of determination () were used as the evaluation metrics. The evaluation results demonstrated that the hybrid models showed superior performance than the standalone models. The hybrid model consisting of gradient boosting and BOA (GBoost‐BOA) achieved the best prediction results compared with the other hybrid models, with the highest R2 value of 0.96 and the smallest values of RMSE and MAE of 0.03 and 0.02, respectively. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis was carried out to study the effects of input variables on rock fragmentation. In situ block size (XB), elastic modulus (E), and stemming length‐to‐burden ratio (T/B) were set as the main influencing factors. The proposed hybrid model provided a reliable prediction result and thus could be considered an alternative approach for rock fragment prediction in mining engineering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deep Underground Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 s1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deep Underground Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dug2.12089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deep Underground Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dug2.12089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

岩石破碎是评估爆破作业质量的一个重要指标。然而,由于爆破参数和岩石特性的复杂性,准确预测爆破后的岩石破碎率具有挑战性。为此,本研究采用贝叶斯优化算法(BOA)进行优化,开发了四种混合机器学习模型,包括随机森林、自适应提升、梯度提升和极随机树。研究共采用了 102 组数据,包括 7 个输入参数(间距与荷载比、孔深与荷载比、荷载与孔径比、茎杆长度与荷载比、粉末系数、原位块体尺寸和弹性模量)和 1 个输出参数(岩石碎块平均尺寸 X50),对预测模型进行了训练和验证。采用均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和判定系数()作为评价指标。评估结果表明,混合模型的性能优于独立模型。与其他混合模型相比,由梯度提升和 BOA 组成的混合模型(GBoost-BOA)取得了最好的预测结果,其 R2 值最高,为 0.96,RMSE 和 MAE 值最小,分别为 0.03 和 0.02。此外,还进行了敏感性分析,以研究输入变量对岩石破碎的影响。将原位块度(XB)、弹性模量(E)和茎杆长度与负载比(T/B)设定为主要影响因素。所提出的混合模型提供了可靠的预测结果,因此可被视为采矿工程中岩石破碎预测的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of rock fragmentation prediction based on RF‐BOA, AdaBoost‐BOA, GBoost‐BOA, and ERT‐BOA hybrid models
Rock fragmentation is an important indicator for assessing the quality of blasting operations. However, accurate prediction of rock fragmentation after blasting is challenging due to the complicated blasting parameters and rock properties. For this reason, optimized by the Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA), four hybrid machine learning models, including random forest, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, and extremely randomized trees, were developed in this study. A total of 102 data sets with seven input parameters (spacing‐to‐burden ratio, hole depth‐to‐burden ratio, burden‐to‐hole diameter ratio, stemming length‐to‐burden ratio, powder factor, in situ block size, and elastic modulus) and one output parameter (rock fragment mean size, X50) were adopted to train and validate the predictive models. The root mean square error (RMSE), the mean absolute error (MAE), and the coefficient of determination () were used as the evaluation metrics. The evaluation results demonstrated that the hybrid models showed superior performance than the standalone models. The hybrid model consisting of gradient boosting and BOA (GBoost‐BOA) achieved the best prediction results compared with the other hybrid models, with the highest R2 value of 0.96 and the smallest values of RMSE and MAE of 0.03 and 0.02, respectively. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis was carried out to study the effects of input variables on rock fragmentation. In situ block size (XB), elastic modulus (E), and stemming length‐to‐burden ratio (T/B) were set as the main influencing factors. The proposed hybrid model provided a reliable prediction result and thus could be considered an alternative approach for rock fragment prediction in mining engineering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信