D. Barloková, Ján Ilavský, Alena Matis, O. Kapusta
{"title":"罗兹格伦德水处理厂常规水处理与超滤试点试验的比较","authors":"D. Barloková, Ján Ilavský, Alena Matis, O. Kapusta","doi":"10.15244/pjoes/177621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"WTP Rozgrund, which was used to treat to the water from Rozgrund reservoir, must have been set out of operation due to the deteriorated quality of the water and its smell. The aAim of this work was to perform the pilot-plant tests, with the goal ofaiming to treating water from the reservoir to achieveand get the compliantying water quality of the water. Conventional water treatment concerning coagulation, flocculation, and filtration with two different filtration fillings – Filtralite Mono-MultiFine and filter sand with black-coal material Carboziar – was compared with conventional treatments with filter sand and Carboziar complemented with filtration through granulated active coal (Norit 830), the ultrafilration using fully automated equipment with membrane module UA-640 (Microdyn-Nadir), and ultrafiltration combined with active granulated carbon. Monitored wereas the pH, turbidity, color, alkalinity, COD Mn , TOC, aluminum, number and size of particles, and hydrobiology in the samples of raw and treated water. Obtained results provided that the two most suitable treatment technologies were the filtration with double layer filling consisting of sand and antracite combined with filtration via GAU (removal efficiency of COD Mn and turbidity was 90.5% and 85%, respectively) and the ultrafiltration combined with GAU (82.6% for COD Mn and 89% for turbidity removal). Biological activation after the treatment was not found.","PeriodicalId":510399,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Environmental Studies","volume":"69 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Conventional Water Treatment\\nand Ultrafiltration Pilot Tests\\nin the Rozgrund Water Treatment Plant\",\"authors\":\"D. Barloková, Ján Ilavský, Alena Matis, O. Kapusta\",\"doi\":\"10.15244/pjoes/177621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"WTP Rozgrund, which was used to treat to the water from Rozgrund reservoir, must have been set out of operation due to the deteriorated quality of the water and its smell. The aAim of this work was to perform the pilot-plant tests, with the goal ofaiming to treating water from the reservoir to achieveand get the compliantying water quality of the water. Conventional water treatment concerning coagulation, flocculation, and filtration with two different filtration fillings – Filtralite Mono-MultiFine and filter sand with black-coal material Carboziar – was compared with conventional treatments with filter sand and Carboziar complemented with filtration through granulated active coal (Norit 830), the ultrafilration using fully automated equipment with membrane module UA-640 (Microdyn-Nadir), and ultrafiltration combined with active granulated carbon. Monitored wereas the pH, turbidity, color, alkalinity, COD Mn , TOC, aluminum, number and size of particles, and hydrobiology in the samples of raw and treated water. Obtained results provided that the two most suitable treatment technologies were the filtration with double layer filling consisting of sand and antracite combined with filtration via GAU (removal efficiency of COD Mn and turbidity was 90.5% and 85%, respectively) and the ultrafiltration combined with GAU (82.6% for COD Mn and 89% for turbidity removal). Biological activation after the treatment was not found.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Environmental Studies\",\"volume\":\"69 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Environmental Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/177621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Environmental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/177621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Conventional Water Treatment
and Ultrafiltration Pilot Tests
in the Rozgrund Water Treatment Plant
WTP Rozgrund, which was used to treat to the water from Rozgrund reservoir, must have been set out of operation due to the deteriorated quality of the water and its smell. The aAim of this work was to perform the pilot-plant tests, with the goal ofaiming to treating water from the reservoir to achieveand get the compliantying water quality of the water. Conventional water treatment concerning coagulation, flocculation, and filtration with two different filtration fillings – Filtralite Mono-MultiFine and filter sand with black-coal material Carboziar – was compared with conventional treatments with filter sand and Carboziar complemented with filtration through granulated active coal (Norit 830), the ultrafilration using fully automated equipment with membrane module UA-640 (Microdyn-Nadir), and ultrafiltration combined with active granulated carbon. Monitored wereas the pH, turbidity, color, alkalinity, COD Mn , TOC, aluminum, number and size of particles, and hydrobiology in the samples of raw and treated water. Obtained results provided that the two most suitable treatment technologies were the filtration with double layer filling consisting of sand and antracite combined with filtration via GAU (removal efficiency of COD Mn and turbidity was 90.5% and 85%, respectively) and the ultrafiltration combined with GAU (82.6% for COD Mn and 89% for turbidity removal). Biological activation after the treatment was not found.