利用生成式人工智能构建合成数据集,训练大型语言模型,从临床笔记中对急性肾衰竭进行分类。

Onkar Litake, Brian H Park, Jeffrey L. Tully, Rodney A Gabriel
{"title":"利用生成式人工智能构建合成数据集,训练大型语言模型,从临床笔记中对急性肾衰竭进行分类。","authors":"Onkar Litake, Brian H Park, Jeffrey L. Tully, Rodney A Gabriel","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocae081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo compare performances of a classifier that leverages language models when trained on synthetic versus authentic clinical notes.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nA classifier using language models was developed to identify acute renal failure. Four types of training data were compared: (1) notes from MIMIC-III; and (2, 3, and 4) synthetic notes generated by ChatGPT of varied text lengths of 15 (GPT-15 sentences), 30 (GPT-30 sentences), and 45 (GPT-45 sentences) sentences, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was calculated from a test set from MIMIC-III.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWith RoBERTa, the AUCs were 0.84, 0.80, 0.84, and 0.76 for the MIMIC-III, GPT-15, GPT-30- and GPT-45 sentences training sets, respectively.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nTraining language models to detect acute renal failure from clinical notes resulted in similar performances when using synthetic versus authentic training data.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe use of training data derived from protected health information may not be needed.","PeriodicalId":236137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","volume":"26 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing synthetic datasets with generative artificial intelligence to train large language models to classify acute renal failure from clinical notes.\",\"authors\":\"Onkar Litake, Brian H Park, Jeffrey L. Tully, Rodney A Gabriel\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocae081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\nTo compare performances of a classifier that leverages language models when trained on synthetic versus authentic clinical notes.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\nA classifier using language models was developed to identify acute renal failure. Four types of training data were compared: (1) notes from MIMIC-III; and (2, 3, and 4) synthetic notes generated by ChatGPT of varied text lengths of 15 (GPT-15 sentences), 30 (GPT-30 sentences), and 45 (GPT-45 sentences) sentences, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was calculated from a test set from MIMIC-III.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nWith RoBERTa, the AUCs were 0.84, 0.80, 0.84, and 0.76 for the MIMIC-III, GPT-15, GPT-30- and GPT-45 sentences training sets, respectively.\\n\\n\\nDISCUSSION\\nTraining language models to detect acute renal failure from clinical notes resulted in similar performances when using synthetic versus authentic training data.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThe use of training data derived from protected health information may not be needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料与方法开发了一种使用语言模型的分类器来识别急性肾衰竭。比较了四种类型的训练数据:(1)来自 MIMIC-III 的笔记;(2、3 和 4)由 ChatGPT 生成的合成笔记,文本长度分别为 15 句(GPT-15 句)、30 句(GPT-30 句)和 45 句(GPT-45 句)。结果使用 RoBERTa,MIMIC-III、GPT-15、GPT-30 和 GPT-45 句子训练集的 AUC 分别为 0.84、0.80、0.84 和 0.76。讨论从临床笔记中训练语言模型来检测急性肾衰竭,在使用合成训练数据和真实训练数据时,结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constructing synthetic datasets with generative artificial intelligence to train large language models to classify acute renal failure from clinical notes.
OBJECTIVES To compare performances of a classifier that leverages language models when trained on synthetic versus authentic clinical notes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A classifier using language models was developed to identify acute renal failure. Four types of training data were compared: (1) notes from MIMIC-III; and (2, 3, and 4) synthetic notes generated by ChatGPT of varied text lengths of 15 (GPT-15 sentences), 30 (GPT-30 sentences), and 45 (GPT-45 sentences) sentences, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was calculated from a test set from MIMIC-III. RESULTS With RoBERTa, the AUCs were 0.84, 0.80, 0.84, and 0.76 for the MIMIC-III, GPT-15, GPT-30- and GPT-45 sentences training sets, respectively. DISCUSSION Training language models to detect acute renal failure from clinical notes resulted in similar performances when using synthetic versus authentic training data. CONCLUSION The use of training data derived from protected health information may not be needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信