Naeem Shareef Abdulhusein, M. Deevband, Mohammad Ali Ghodsirad, Marziyeh Behmadi, G. Mehri-Kakavand
{"title":"使用 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOC 评估肝脏扫描中的 SPECT 图像重建使用 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOC 评估肝脏扫描中的 SPECT 图像重建","authors":"Naeem Shareef Abdulhusein, M. Deevband, Mohammad Ali Ghodsirad, Marziyeh Behmadi, G. Mehri-Kakavand","doi":"10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Given that the Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) image quality is defined experimentally, developing a specialized scanning technique for each procedure is necessary to increase the diagnosis accuracy. This study aims to determine the optimal algorithm for liver scan reconstruction using 99mTc/SPECT. \nMaterials and Methods: The Filtered Back-Projection (FBP) reconstruction method was used in liver scanning using 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC (Tektrotyd) for SPECT images of 30 patients which were acquired with a dual-head EvoExel detector system. Using different types of filters in SPECT imaging, various optimal results can be achieved in the processed images, such as artifact reduction, noise reduction, or signal enhancement and recovery. To evaluate the effect of different filters on image quality, Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR), Contrast-to-Noise-Ratio (CNR), and contrast parameters were calculated. \nResults: Applying filters enhanced contrast in the images in most cases as well as CNR and SNR. Metz (power = 2), Shepp-Logan (Cut-off frequency = 0.67) and Metz (power = 2) filters increase the CNR, contrast and SNR in images more than the other filters, respectively. The maximum improvement for CNR, contrast and SNR was from 0.62 to 2.35, 0.99 to 1.31, and 8.48 to 14.70, respectively. \nConclusion: Based on the results, the Hamming filter, due to providing high-quality images for visual analysis of liver SPECT, and the Butterworth filter, due to balancing the image quality and noise for quantitative analysis, are recommended.","PeriodicalId":34203,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","volume":"30 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of SPECT Image Reconstruction in Liver Scanning Using 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOCAssessment of SPECT Image Reconstruction in Liver Scanning Using 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOC\",\"authors\":\"Naeem Shareef Abdulhusein, M. Deevband, Mohammad Ali Ghodsirad, Marziyeh Behmadi, G. Mehri-Kakavand\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Given that the Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) image quality is defined experimentally, developing a specialized scanning technique for each procedure is necessary to increase the diagnosis accuracy. This study aims to determine the optimal algorithm for liver scan reconstruction using 99mTc/SPECT. \\nMaterials and Methods: The Filtered Back-Projection (FBP) reconstruction method was used in liver scanning using 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC (Tektrotyd) for SPECT images of 30 patients which were acquired with a dual-head EvoExel detector system. Using different types of filters in SPECT imaging, various optimal results can be achieved in the processed images, such as artifact reduction, noise reduction, or signal enhancement and recovery. To evaluate the effect of different filters on image quality, Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR), Contrast-to-Noise-Ratio (CNR), and contrast parameters were calculated. \\nResults: Applying filters enhanced contrast in the images in most cases as well as CNR and SNR. Metz (power = 2), Shepp-Logan (Cut-off frequency = 0.67) and Metz (power = 2) filters increase the CNR, contrast and SNR in images more than the other filters, respectively. The maximum improvement for CNR, contrast and SNR was from 0.62 to 2.35, 0.99 to 1.31, and 8.48 to 14.70, respectively. \\nConclusion: Based on the results, the Hamming filter, due to providing high-quality images for visual analysis of liver SPECT, and the Butterworth filter, due to balancing the image quality and noise for quantitative analysis, are recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies\",\"volume\":\"30 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of SPECT Image Reconstruction in Liver Scanning Using 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOCAssessment of SPECT Image Reconstruction in Liver Scanning Using 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOC
Purpose: Given that the Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) image quality is defined experimentally, developing a specialized scanning technique for each procedure is necessary to increase the diagnosis accuracy. This study aims to determine the optimal algorithm for liver scan reconstruction using 99mTc/SPECT.
Materials and Methods: The Filtered Back-Projection (FBP) reconstruction method was used in liver scanning using 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC (Tektrotyd) for SPECT images of 30 patients which were acquired with a dual-head EvoExel detector system. Using different types of filters in SPECT imaging, various optimal results can be achieved in the processed images, such as artifact reduction, noise reduction, or signal enhancement and recovery. To evaluate the effect of different filters on image quality, Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR), Contrast-to-Noise-Ratio (CNR), and contrast parameters were calculated.
Results: Applying filters enhanced contrast in the images in most cases as well as CNR and SNR. Metz (power = 2), Shepp-Logan (Cut-off frequency = 0.67) and Metz (power = 2) filters increase the CNR, contrast and SNR in images more than the other filters, respectively. The maximum improvement for CNR, contrast and SNR was from 0.62 to 2.35, 0.99 to 1.31, and 8.48 to 14.70, respectively.
Conclusion: Based on the results, the Hamming filter, due to providing high-quality images for visual analysis of liver SPECT, and the Butterworth filter, due to balancing the image quality and noise for quantitative analysis, are recommended.