有创血管造影和阿加斯顿评分显示的冠状动脉钙化--单中心经验

Zafraan Zathar, M. Pandit, Anne Karunatilleke, Alp Notghi, Vinod P Sharma
{"title":"有创血管造影和阿加斯顿评分显示的冠状动脉钙化--单中心经验","authors":"Zafraan Zathar, M. Pandit, Anne Karunatilleke, Alp Notghi, Vinod P Sharma","doi":"10.37349/ec.2024.00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The pattern and severity of coronary artery calcification (CAC) can influence prognosis and outcome in percutaneous coronary intervention. An objective assessment of CAC during invasive angiography may provide additional prognostic information. This study aimed to assess the correlation between the angiographic Birmingham calcium score (BCS) and the Agatston coronary calcium score (CCS) performed as part of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI).\nMethods: In this retrospective observational study, patients undergoing SPECT-MPI and invasive coronary angiography as part of their routine management were included. BCS was calculated by reviewing angiography images in retrospect by an observer blinded to the SPECT-MPI calcium score. Spearman’s correlation was used to analyze the correlation between BCS and SPECT-MPI. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to detect cut-off for BCS that would detect clinically significant CAC [> 400 Agatston units (AU)]. Kaplan-Meier was used to report on outcomes at 5 years follow-up.\nResults: In this cohort of 151 patients, there was a positive correlation between BCS and CCS [Spearman correlation coefficient (r) = 0.558, P < 0.001]. Cumulative BCS of 1 was able to identify clinically significant CAC [area under the curve 0.788, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.714–0.863]. Cumulative BCS ≥ 3 was associated with major adverse outcomes at 5 years follow-up (log rank P = 0.013).\nConclusion: BCS correlates well with established higher CCS. Application of BCS during invasive coronary angiography will aid risk stratification, management, and follow-up with no extra patient involvement, radiation, or costs.","PeriodicalId":218206,"journal":{"name":"Exploration of Cardiology","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronary calcification on invasive angiography and the Agatston score—a single-center experience\",\"authors\":\"Zafraan Zathar, M. Pandit, Anne Karunatilleke, Alp Notghi, Vinod P Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.37349/ec.2024.00022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The pattern and severity of coronary artery calcification (CAC) can influence prognosis and outcome in percutaneous coronary intervention. An objective assessment of CAC during invasive angiography may provide additional prognostic information. This study aimed to assess the correlation between the angiographic Birmingham calcium score (BCS) and the Agatston coronary calcium score (CCS) performed as part of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI).\\nMethods: In this retrospective observational study, patients undergoing SPECT-MPI and invasive coronary angiography as part of their routine management were included. BCS was calculated by reviewing angiography images in retrospect by an observer blinded to the SPECT-MPI calcium score. Spearman’s correlation was used to analyze the correlation between BCS and SPECT-MPI. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to detect cut-off for BCS that would detect clinically significant CAC [> 400 Agatston units (AU)]. Kaplan-Meier was used to report on outcomes at 5 years follow-up.\\nResults: In this cohort of 151 patients, there was a positive correlation between BCS and CCS [Spearman correlation coefficient (r) = 0.558, P < 0.001]. Cumulative BCS of 1 was able to identify clinically significant CAC [area under the curve 0.788, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.714–0.863]. Cumulative BCS ≥ 3 was associated with major adverse outcomes at 5 years follow-up (log rank P = 0.013).\\nConclusion: BCS correlates well with established higher CCS. Application of BCS during invasive coronary angiography will aid risk stratification, management, and follow-up with no extra patient involvement, radiation, or costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":218206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploration of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploration of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37349/ec.2024.00022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37349/ec.2024.00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:冠状动脉钙化(CAC)的模式和严重程度会影响经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的预后和效果。在有创血管造影过程中对 CAC 进行客观评估可提供额外的预后信息。本研究旨在评估血管造影伯明翰钙化评分(BCS)与作为单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像(SPECT-MPI)一部分的阿加特斯通冠状动脉钙化评分(CCS)之间的相关性:在这项回顾性观察研究中,纳入了接受 SPECT-MPI 和有创冠状动脉造影术作为常规治疗一部分的患者。BCS由一名对SPECT-MPI钙化分值视而不见的观察者通过回顾性查看血管造影图像计算得出。斯皮尔曼相关性用于分析 BCS 与 SPECT-MPI 之间的相关性。采用接收者操作特征曲线来检测BCS的临界值,该临界值可检测出临床上显著的CAC[> 400 阿加特斯通单位(AU)]。采用 Kaplan-Meier 报告随访 5 年的结果:在这组 151 名患者中,BCS 与 CAC 呈正相关[斯皮尔曼相关系数 (r) = 0.558,P < 0.001]。累积 BCS 值为 1 时,可识别出临床意义的 CAC [曲线下面积为 0.788,95% 置信区间 (CI) 为 0.714-0.863]。累积 BCS ≥ 3 与随访 5 年的主要不良后果相关(对数秩 P = 0.013):结论:BCS与已建立的较高CCS有很好的相关性。在有创冠状动脉造影术中应用 BCS 将有助于风险分层、管理和随访,且不会增加患者参与、辐射或费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coronary calcification on invasive angiography and the Agatston score—a single-center experience
Aim: The pattern and severity of coronary artery calcification (CAC) can influence prognosis and outcome in percutaneous coronary intervention. An objective assessment of CAC during invasive angiography may provide additional prognostic information. This study aimed to assess the correlation between the angiographic Birmingham calcium score (BCS) and the Agatston coronary calcium score (CCS) performed as part of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI). Methods: In this retrospective observational study, patients undergoing SPECT-MPI and invasive coronary angiography as part of their routine management were included. BCS was calculated by reviewing angiography images in retrospect by an observer blinded to the SPECT-MPI calcium score. Spearman’s correlation was used to analyze the correlation between BCS and SPECT-MPI. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to detect cut-off for BCS that would detect clinically significant CAC [> 400 Agatston units (AU)]. Kaplan-Meier was used to report on outcomes at 5 years follow-up. Results: In this cohort of 151 patients, there was a positive correlation between BCS and CCS [Spearman correlation coefficient (r) = 0.558, P < 0.001]. Cumulative BCS of 1 was able to identify clinically significant CAC [area under the curve 0.788, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.714–0.863]. Cumulative BCS ≥ 3 was associated with major adverse outcomes at 5 years follow-up (log rank P = 0.013). Conclusion: BCS correlates well with established higher CCS. Application of BCS during invasive coronary angiography will aid risk stratification, management, and follow-up with no extra patient involvement, radiation, or costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信