在分子肿瘤委员会上展示的泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤患者的初诊结果。

Jakob Michaelis, Ruth Himmelsbach, Patrick Metzger, S. Lassmann, Melanie Börries, Martin Werner, C. Miething, Rouven Höfflin, A. Illert, J. Duyster, Heiko Becker, A. Sigle, Christian Gratzke, Markus Grabbert
{"title":"在分子肿瘤委员会上展示的泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤患者的初诊结果。","authors":"Jakob Michaelis, Ruth Himmelsbach, Patrick Metzger, S. Lassmann, Melanie Börries, Martin Werner, C. Miething, Rouven Höfflin, A. Illert, J. Duyster, Heiko Becker, A. Sigle, Christian Gratzke, Markus Grabbert","doi":"10.1159/000538908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nPersonalized medicine poses great opportunities and challenges. While therapeutic landscape markedly expands, descriptions about status, clinical implementation and real-world benefits of precision oncology and molecular tumor boards (MTB) remain sparse, particularly in the field of genitourinary (GU) cancer. Hence, this study characterized urological MTB cases to better understand the potential role of MTB in uro-oncology.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe analyzed patients with complete data sets being reviewed at an MTB from January 2019 to October 2022, focusing on results of molecular analysis and treatment recommendations.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe evaluated 102 patients with GU cancer with a mean patient age of 61.7 years. Prostate cancer (PCa) was the most frequent entity with 52.9% (54/102), followed by bladder cancer (18.6%, 19/102) and renal cell carcinoma (14.7%, 15/102). On average, case presentation at MTB took place 54.9 months after initial diagnosis and after 2.7 previous lines of therapy. During the study period 49.0% (50/102) of patients deceased. Additional MTB-based treatment recommendations were achieved in a majority of 68.6% (70/102) of patients, with a recommendation for targeted therapy in 64.3% (45/70) of these patients. Only 6.7% (3/45) of patients - due to different reasons - received the recommended MTB-based therapy tough, with 33% (1/3) of patients reaching disease control. Throughout the MTB study period, GU cancer case presentations and treatment recommendations increased, while the time interval between initial presentation and final therapy recommendation were decreasing over time.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPresentation of uro-oncological patients at the MTB is a highly valuable measure for clinical decision-making. Prospectively, earlier presentation of patients at the MTB and changing legislative issues regarding comprehensive molecular testing and targeted treatment approval might further improve patients' benefits from comprehensive molecular diagnostics.","PeriodicalId":509662,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary results of patients with genitourinary malignancies presented at a Molecular Tumor Board.\",\"authors\":\"Jakob Michaelis, Ruth Himmelsbach, Patrick Metzger, S. Lassmann, Melanie Börries, Martin Werner, C. Miething, Rouven Höfflin, A. Illert, J. Duyster, Heiko Becker, A. Sigle, Christian Gratzke, Markus Grabbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\nPersonalized medicine poses great opportunities and challenges. While therapeutic landscape markedly expands, descriptions about status, clinical implementation and real-world benefits of precision oncology and molecular tumor boards (MTB) remain sparse, particularly in the field of genitourinary (GU) cancer. Hence, this study characterized urological MTB cases to better understand the potential role of MTB in uro-oncology.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nWe analyzed patients with complete data sets being reviewed at an MTB from January 2019 to October 2022, focusing on results of molecular analysis and treatment recommendations.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nWe evaluated 102 patients with GU cancer with a mean patient age of 61.7 years. Prostate cancer (PCa) was the most frequent entity with 52.9% (54/102), followed by bladder cancer (18.6%, 19/102) and renal cell carcinoma (14.7%, 15/102). On average, case presentation at MTB took place 54.9 months after initial diagnosis and after 2.7 previous lines of therapy. During the study period 49.0% (50/102) of patients deceased. Additional MTB-based treatment recommendations were achieved in a majority of 68.6% (70/102) of patients, with a recommendation for targeted therapy in 64.3% (45/70) of these patients. Only 6.7% (3/45) of patients - due to different reasons - received the recommended MTB-based therapy tough, with 33% (1/3) of patients reaching disease control. Throughout the MTB study period, GU cancer case presentations and treatment recommendations increased, while the time interval between initial presentation and final therapy recommendation were decreasing over time.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nPresentation of uro-oncological patients at the MTB is a highly valuable measure for clinical decision-making. Prospectively, earlier presentation of patients at the MTB and changing legislative issues regarding comprehensive molecular testing and targeted treatment approval might further improve patients' benefits from comprehensive molecular diagnostics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的个性化医疗带来了巨大的机遇和挑战。虽然治疗领域明显扩大,但有关精准肿瘤学和分子肿瘤学(MTB)的现状、临床实施和实际效益的描述仍然很少,尤其是在泌尿生殖系统(GU)癌症领域。因此,本研究对泌尿科 MTB 病例进行了特征描述,以更好地了解 MTB 在泌尿肿瘤学中的潜在作用。方法我们分析了 2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月在 MTB 审查的具有完整数据集的患者,重点关注分子分析结果和治疗建议。前列腺癌(PCa)最常见,占 52.9%(54/102),其次是膀胱癌(18.6%,19/102)和肾细胞癌(14.7%,15/102)。在 MTB 就诊的病例平均是在初次诊断后 54.9 个月和经过 2.7 次治疗后出现的。在研究期间,49.0%(50/102)的患者死亡。68.6%(70/102)的患者获得了基于 MTB 的额外治疗建议,其中 64.3%(45/70)的患者获得了靶向治疗建议。只有 6.7%(3/45)的患者由于不同原因接受了建议的 MTB 治疗,33%(1/3)的患者病情得到控制。在整个 MTB 研究期间,泌尿系统肿瘤病例报告和治疗建议均有所增加,而首次报告和最终治疗建议之间的时间间隔却在逐渐缩短。展望未来,患者更早到 MTB 就诊以及有关综合分子检测和靶向治疗审批的立法问题的改变,可能会进一步提高患者从综合分子诊断中获益的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary results of patients with genitourinary malignancies presented at a Molecular Tumor Board.
PURPOSE Personalized medicine poses great opportunities and challenges. While therapeutic landscape markedly expands, descriptions about status, clinical implementation and real-world benefits of precision oncology and molecular tumor boards (MTB) remain sparse, particularly in the field of genitourinary (GU) cancer. Hence, this study characterized urological MTB cases to better understand the potential role of MTB in uro-oncology. METHODS We analyzed patients with complete data sets being reviewed at an MTB from January 2019 to October 2022, focusing on results of molecular analysis and treatment recommendations. RESULTS We evaluated 102 patients with GU cancer with a mean patient age of 61.7 years. Prostate cancer (PCa) was the most frequent entity with 52.9% (54/102), followed by bladder cancer (18.6%, 19/102) and renal cell carcinoma (14.7%, 15/102). On average, case presentation at MTB took place 54.9 months after initial diagnosis and after 2.7 previous lines of therapy. During the study period 49.0% (50/102) of patients deceased. Additional MTB-based treatment recommendations were achieved in a majority of 68.6% (70/102) of patients, with a recommendation for targeted therapy in 64.3% (45/70) of these patients. Only 6.7% (3/45) of patients - due to different reasons - received the recommended MTB-based therapy tough, with 33% (1/3) of patients reaching disease control. Throughout the MTB study period, GU cancer case presentations and treatment recommendations increased, while the time interval between initial presentation and final therapy recommendation were decreasing over time. CONCLUSION Presentation of uro-oncological patients at the MTB is a highly valuable measure for clinical decision-making. Prospectively, earlier presentation of patients at the MTB and changing legislative issues regarding comprehensive molecular testing and targeted treatment approval might further improve patients' benefits from comprehensive molecular diagnostics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信