直肠垫片可减少根治性前列腺切除术后放射治疗的胃肠道副作用

Anne Hong, Damien Bolton, T. Phạm, D. Angus, David Pan, D. L. Joon, A. Tan, Kevin McMillan, Y. Chan, Paul Manohar, Joe Thomas, H. Ho, Peter Orio, Emily Holt, M. Cokelek, Nathan Lawrentschuk, F. Foroudi, Michael Chao
{"title":"直肠垫片可减少根治性前列腺切除术后放射治疗的胃肠道副作用","authors":"Anne Hong, Damien Bolton, T. Phạm, D. Angus, David Pan, D. L. Joon, A. Tan, Kevin McMillan, Y. Chan, Paul Manohar, Joe Thomas, H. Ho, Peter Orio, Emily Holt, M. Cokelek, Nathan Lawrentschuk, F. Foroudi, Michael Chao","doi":"10.3390/siuj5020020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Our objective was to assess the rate of complications and gastrointestinal adverse effects of rectal spacer insertion for salvage post prostatectomy radiation therapy. Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed. Between September 2018 and March 2022, 64 post-radical prostatectomy patients who were planned for salvage radiation therapy received a rectal spacer. The selected patients were those who had nerve-sparing prostatectomy with intrafascial or interfascial dissections (where Denonvillier’s fascia is retained). Radiation dose to the rectal wall and gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed. Symptoms were graded using the National Cancer Center Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grading scheme. A total of 39 patients had pre-spacer planning computer tomography (CT) scans, and the rectal dose before and after the spacer insertion was calculated. Comparisons were made using the Student’s t-test, with a p-value < 0.05 representing statistical significance. Finally, clinicians were surveyed to rate the ease of the procedure using a 5-point Likert scale of 1 to 5 (1: very difficult, 2: difficult, 3: moderate, 4: easy, 5: very easy). Results: A total of 64 patients successfully underwent rectal spacer insertion. The mean age was 64.4 years (standard deviation: 5.7 years). After a median of 14 months’ (range 6 to 35) follow up, acute grade 1 and above gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were seen in 28% of patients (grade 2 in 1.5%), and late grade 1 and above GI toxicities were seen in 12% of patients (grade 2 in 1.5%). Amongst the 39 patients with pre-spacer planning CT images, the volume of the rectum receiving 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% of the prescribed radiation dose was reduced by 25.9%, 34.2%, 35.4%, 43.7%, and 61.7%, respectively. All dose reductions were statistically significant. The procedure was rated as “easy” or “very easy” to perform in 56% of cases. Conclusions: The insertion of a rectal spacer in selected patients undergoing PPRT is feasible and safe and significantly improves rectal wall radiation dosimetry in salvage post prostatectomy radiation therapy. It was accomplished in >95% of patients, increasing vesico-rectal separation from ‘immediate vicinity’ to 11 mm without any post-operative complications in experienced hands. In addition, it achieved significant reduction in rectal radiation doses, leading to low rates of acute and late grade 2 toxicity.","PeriodicalId":21961,"journal":{"name":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rectal Spacer Reduces Gastrointestinal Side Effects of Radiation Post Radical Prostatectomy\",\"authors\":\"Anne Hong, Damien Bolton, T. Phạm, D. Angus, David Pan, D. L. Joon, A. Tan, Kevin McMillan, Y. Chan, Paul Manohar, Joe Thomas, H. Ho, Peter Orio, Emily Holt, M. Cokelek, Nathan Lawrentschuk, F. Foroudi, Michael Chao\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/siuj5020020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Our objective was to assess the rate of complications and gastrointestinal adverse effects of rectal spacer insertion for salvage post prostatectomy radiation therapy. Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed. Between September 2018 and March 2022, 64 post-radical prostatectomy patients who were planned for salvage radiation therapy received a rectal spacer. The selected patients were those who had nerve-sparing prostatectomy with intrafascial or interfascial dissections (where Denonvillier’s fascia is retained). Radiation dose to the rectal wall and gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed. Symptoms were graded using the National Cancer Center Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grading scheme. A total of 39 patients had pre-spacer planning computer tomography (CT) scans, and the rectal dose before and after the spacer insertion was calculated. Comparisons were made using the Student’s t-test, with a p-value < 0.05 representing statistical significance. Finally, clinicians were surveyed to rate the ease of the procedure using a 5-point Likert scale of 1 to 5 (1: very difficult, 2: difficult, 3: moderate, 4: easy, 5: very easy). Results: A total of 64 patients successfully underwent rectal spacer insertion. The mean age was 64.4 years (standard deviation: 5.7 years). After a median of 14 months’ (range 6 to 35) follow up, acute grade 1 and above gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were seen in 28% of patients (grade 2 in 1.5%), and late grade 1 and above GI toxicities were seen in 12% of patients (grade 2 in 1.5%). Amongst the 39 patients with pre-spacer planning CT images, the volume of the rectum receiving 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% of the prescribed radiation dose was reduced by 25.9%, 34.2%, 35.4%, 43.7%, and 61.7%, respectively. All dose reductions were statistically significant. The procedure was rated as “easy” or “very easy” to perform in 56% of cases. Conclusions: The insertion of a rectal spacer in selected patients undergoing PPRT is feasible and safe and significantly improves rectal wall radiation dosimetry in salvage post prostatectomy radiation therapy. It was accomplished in >95% of patients, increasing vesico-rectal separation from ‘immediate vicinity’ to 11 mm without any post-operative complications in experienced hands. In addition, it achieved significant reduction in rectal radiation doses, leading to low rates of acute and late grade 2 toxicity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj5020020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj5020020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的目的是评估前列腺切除术后放射治疗中插入直肠垫片的并发症发生率和胃肠道不良反应。方法: 我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究:我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究。2018年9月至2022年3月期间,64名前列腺根治术后患者计划接受挽救性放疗,并接受了直肠间隔器。所选患者均接受了筋膜内或筋膜间切除术(保留德农维利耶筋膜)的保神经前列腺切除术。对直肠壁的辐射剂量和胃肠道症状进行了评估。症状采用美国国家癌症中心研究所不良事件通用术语标准 v4.0 分级方案进行分级。共有 39 名患者接受了植入前计算机断层扫描(CT),并计算了植入前和植入后的直肠剂量。比较结果采用学生 t 检验,P 值小于 0.05 代表统计学意义显著。最后,对临床医生进行了调查,采用 1-5 级李克特 5 点量表(1:非常困难;2:困难;3:中等;4:容易;5:非常容易)对手术的难易程度进行评分。结果共有 64 名患者成功接受了直肠间隔器植入手术。平均年龄为 64.4 岁(标准差:5.7 岁)。经过中位 14 个月(6 至 35 个月)的随访,28% 的患者出现急性 1 级及以上胃肠道毒性反应(1.5% 出现 2 级),12% 的患者出现晚期 1 级及以上胃肠道毒性反应(1.5% 出现 2 级)。在 39 名有前间隔规划 CT 图像的患者中,接受 60%、70%、80%、90% 和 100% 规定辐射剂量的直肠体积分别减少了 25.9%、34.2%、35.4%、43.7% 和 61.7%。所有剂量的减少都具有显著的统计学意义。56%的病例认为手术 "容易 "或 "非常容易 "完成。结论在接受前列腺切除术后放射治疗的特定患者中插入直肠间隔器是可行和安全的,并能显著改善前列腺切除术后挽救性放射治疗中的直肠壁放射剂量测定。95%以上的患者都能做到这一点,经验丰富的医生可将膀胱直肠间距从 "邻近 "增加到 11 毫米,且不会出现任何术后并发症。此外,它还大大减少了直肠辐射剂量,从而降低了急性和晚期二级毒性的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rectal Spacer Reduces Gastrointestinal Side Effects of Radiation Post Radical Prostatectomy
Objectives: Our objective was to assess the rate of complications and gastrointestinal adverse effects of rectal spacer insertion for salvage post prostatectomy radiation therapy. Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed. Between September 2018 and March 2022, 64 post-radical prostatectomy patients who were planned for salvage radiation therapy received a rectal spacer. The selected patients were those who had nerve-sparing prostatectomy with intrafascial or interfascial dissections (where Denonvillier’s fascia is retained). Radiation dose to the rectal wall and gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed. Symptoms were graded using the National Cancer Center Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grading scheme. A total of 39 patients had pre-spacer planning computer tomography (CT) scans, and the rectal dose before and after the spacer insertion was calculated. Comparisons were made using the Student’s t-test, with a p-value < 0.05 representing statistical significance. Finally, clinicians were surveyed to rate the ease of the procedure using a 5-point Likert scale of 1 to 5 (1: very difficult, 2: difficult, 3: moderate, 4: easy, 5: very easy). Results: A total of 64 patients successfully underwent rectal spacer insertion. The mean age was 64.4 years (standard deviation: 5.7 years). After a median of 14 months’ (range 6 to 35) follow up, acute grade 1 and above gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were seen in 28% of patients (grade 2 in 1.5%), and late grade 1 and above GI toxicities were seen in 12% of patients (grade 2 in 1.5%). Amongst the 39 patients with pre-spacer planning CT images, the volume of the rectum receiving 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% of the prescribed radiation dose was reduced by 25.9%, 34.2%, 35.4%, 43.7%, and 61.7%, respectively. All dose reductions were statistically significant. The procedure was rated as “easy” or “very easy” to perform in 56% of cases. Conclusions: The insertion of a rectal spacer in selected patients undergoing PPRT is feasible and safe and significantly improves rectal wall radiation dosimetry in salvage post prostatectomy radiation therapy. It was accomplished in >95% of patients, increasing vesico-rectal separation from ‘immediate vicinity’ to 11 mm without any post-operative complications in experienced hands. In addition, it achieved significant reduction in rectal radiation doses, leading to low rates of acute and late grade 2 toxicity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信