异丙酚深度镇静对老年患者的腺瘤检出率、息肉检出率和盲肠插管率有影响吗?

Irma Širanović Pongrac, V. Tomašić, P. Čačić, T. Pavic, N. Baršić, A. Bišćanin, I. Lerotić, D. Hrabar
{"title":"异丙酚深度镇静对老年患者的腺瘤检出率、息肉检出率和盲肠插管率有影响吗?","authors":"Irma Širanović Pongrac, V. Tomašić, P. Čačić, T. Pavic, N. Baršić, A. Bišćanin, I. Lerotić, D. Hrabar","doi":"10.26800/lv-145-supl9-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims : Early detection of colon adenomas and polyps reduces the risk of colorectal cancer development. Adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR) and cecal intubation rate (CIR) are quality indicators for screening or diagnostic colonoscopy. The available data from previously conducted research regarding ADR, PDR and CIR in groups of patients who were deeply sedated with propofol and those who underwent colonoscopy without sedation are inconclusive. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of deep sedation vs. no-sedation on ADR, PDR and CIR in group of elderly patients. Methods : This was a retrospective cohort study which included adult patients over the age of 60, presenting for a first screening or diagnostic colonoscopy performed over a 4-month time. Participants’ characteristics were assessed using descriptive statistics. Normal distribution was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Continuous variables were analyzed using Mann–Whitney test and categorical variables using Chi-square or Fisher exact test. Binary logistic regression was conducted to identify significant predictors of the outcomes. Two-tailed tests were conducted, and statistical significance was considered when p <0.05. Results : Among 196 patients (53.9% female; mean age: 68.5 years) deep sedation was performed in 97 patients (48.2%). Total PDR was 51.2%, ADR was 18.8%, and CIR was 94.5%. Overall, no significant difference was shown in PDR and ADR between no-sedation and deep sedation groups (χ2(1, N =196)=0.498, P=0.48, χ2(1, N =196)=0.47, P=0.49 respectively). After adjustments for BMI, colon diverticulosis and history of abdominal surgery differences, CIR was significantly higher in deep sedation group (χ2(1, N =196)=6.407, P=0.01). Conclusion : In our mixed cohort of elderly patients undergoing screening and diagnostic colonoscopies, use of propofol-induced deep sedation did not improve ADR or PDR. On the other hand, CIR was influenced by deep sedation. Therefore, further investigations are needed to identify the impact of deep sedation on colonoscopy quality indicators in elderly groups of patients.","PeriodicalId":246678,"journal":{"name":"Liječnički vjesnik","volume":"82 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there an impact of deep sedation with propofol on adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate and cecal intubation rate in elderly patients?\",\"authors\":\"Irma Širanović Pongrac, V. Tomašić, P. Čačić, T. Pavic, N. Baršić, A. Bišćanin, I. Lerotić, D. Hrabar\",\"doi\":\"10.26800/lv-145-supl9-35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and aims : Early detection of colon adenomas and polyps reduces the risk of colorectal cancer development. Adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR) and cecal intubation rate (CIR) are quality indicators for screening or diagnostic colonoscopy. The available data from previously conducted research regarding ADR, PDR and CIR in groups of patients who were deeply sedated with propofol and those who underwent colonoscopy without sedation are inconclusive. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of deep sedation vs. no-sedation on ADR, PDR and CIR in group of elderly patients. Methods : This was a retrospective cohort study which included adult patients over the age of 60, presenting for a first screening or diagnostic colonoscopy performed over a 4-month time. Participants’ characteristics were assessed using descriptive statistics. Normal distribution was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Continuous variables were analyzed using Mann–Whitney test and categorical variables using Chi-square or Fisher exact test. Binary logistic regression was conducted to identify significant predictors of the outcomes. Two-tailed tests were conducted, and statistical significance was considered when p <0.05. Results : Among 196 patients (53.9% female; mean age: 68.5 years) deep sedation was performed in 97 patients (48.2%). Total PDR was 51.2%, ADR was 18.8%, and CIR was 94.5%. Overall, no significant difference was shown in PDR and ADR between no-sedation and deep sedation groups (χ2(1, N =196)=0.498, P=0.48, χ2(1, N =196)=0.47, P=0.49 respectively). After adjustments for BMI, colon diverticulosis and history of abdominal surgery differences, CIR was significantly higher in deep sedation group (χ2(1, N =196)=6.407, P=0.01). Conclusion : In our mixed cohort of elderly patients undergoing screening and diagnostic colonoscopies, use of propofol-induced deep sedation did not improve ADR or PDR. On the other hand, CIR was influenced by deep sedation. Therefore, further investigations are needed to identify the impact of deep sedation on colonoscopy quality indicators in elderly groups of patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liječnički vjesnik\",\"volume\":\"82 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liječnički vjesnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26800/lv-145-supl9-35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liječnički vjesnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26800/lv-145-supl9-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的 :早期发现结肠腺瘤和息肉可降低结肠直肠癌的发病风险。腺瘤检出率(ADR)、息肉检出率(PDR)和盲肠插管率(CIR)是筛查或诊断性结肠镜检查的质量指标。以前进行的研究中关于使用异丙酚深度镇静的患者组和未使用镇静剂进行结肠镜检查的患者组的 ADR、PDR 和 CIR 的现有数据尚无定论。本研究旨在确定深度镇静与不镇静对老年患者组的 ADR、PDR 和 CIR 的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象包括首次接受结肠镜筛查或诊断性检查的 60 岁以上成年患者,时间跨度为 4 个月。采用描述性统计方法评估了参与者的特征。正态分布采用 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 和 Shapiro-Wilk 检验进行评估。连续变量采用 Mann-Whitney 检验进行分析,分类变量采用 Chi-square 或 Fisher exact 检验进行分析。进行二元逻辑回归以确定结果的重要预测因素。采用双尾检验,当 P <0.05 时,统计学意义成立。结果:在196名患者(53.9%为女性;平均年龄:68.5岁)中,97名患者(48.2%)进行了深度镇静。总PDR为51.2%,ADR为18.8%,CIR为94.5%。总体而言,无镇静组和深度镇静组的 PDR 和 ADR 无明显差异(分别为 χ2(1,N =196)=0.498,P=0.48;χ2(1,N =196)=0.47,P=0.49)。在对体重指数、结肠憩室和腹部手术史差异进行调整后,深度镇静组的 CIR 显著更高(χ2(1, N =196)=6.407,P=0.01)。结论:在我们的混合队列中,接受筛查和诊断性结肠镜检查的老年患者使用异丙酚诱导的深度镇静并未改善 ADR 或 PDR。另一方面,深度镇静对 CIR 有影响。因此,需要进一步研究深度镇静对老年患者群体结肠镜检查质量指标的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is there an impact of deep sedation with propofol on adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate and cecal intubation rate in elderly patients?
Background and aims : Early detection of colon adenomas and polyps reduces the risk of colorectal cancer development. Adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR) and cecal intubation rate (CIR) are quality indicators for screening or diagnostic colonoscopy. The available data from previously conducted research regarding ADR, PDR and CIR in groups of patients who were deeply sedated with propofol and those who underwent colonoscopy without sedation are inconclusive. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of deep sedation vs. no-sedation on ADR, PDR and CIR in group of elderly patients. Methods : This was a retrospective cohort study which included adult patients over the age of 60, presenting for a first screening or diagnostic colonoscopy performed over a 4-month time. Participants’ characteristics were assessed using descriptive statistics. Normal distribution was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Continuous variables were analyzed using Mann–Whitney test and categorical variables using Chi-square or Fisher exact test. Binary logistic regression was conducted to identify significant predictors of the outcomes. Two-tailed tests were conducted, and statistical significance was considered when p <0.05. Results : Among 196 patients (53.9% female; mean age: 68.5 years) deep sedation was performed in 97 patients (48.2%). Total PDR was 51.2%, ADR was 18.8%, and CIR was 94.5%. Overall, no significant difference was shown in PDR and ADR between no-sedation and deep sedation groups (χ2(1, N =196)=0.498, P=0.48, χ2(1, N =196)=0.47, P=0.49 respectively). After adjustments for BMI, colon diverticulosis and history of abdominal surgery differences, CIR was significantly higher in deep sedation group (χ2(1, N =196)=6.407, P=0.01). Conclusion : In our mixed cohort of elderly patients undergoing screening and diagnostic colonoscopies, use of propofol-induced deep sedation did not improve ADR or PDR. On the other hand, CIR was influenced by deep sedation. Therefore, further investigations are needed to identify the impact of deep sedation on colonoscopy quality indicators in elderly groups of patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信