内生共生体如何获得细胞

A. Poole
{"title":"内生共生体如何获得细胞","authors":"A. Poole","doi":"10.26686/nzsr.v66.9440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite fundamental advances in cellular, molecular and genome biology, there is still surprisingly little consensus concerning the evolutionary origins of the eukaryote cell. While it is clear that the mitochondrion (responsible for generating much of the energy requirements of the eukaryote cell) has evolved from an endosymbiont cell of bacterial origin, the recent literature has borne witness to a tidal wave of speculative theories regarding the nature of the cell in which this bacterium took up residence. David Penny and I recently argued that much of this confusion can be avoided if models are grounded in known biological processes, and if speculation is tempered by formulating testable hypotheses. The most fanciful hypotheses are an inevitable casualty of a pragmatic approach, but what remains is a productive framework wherein biologically plausible alternatives can be evaluated without the need to invoke ad hoc events or processes, such as biological ‘big bangs’ or hitherto unobserved cell biological phenomena.","PeriodicalId":475845,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Science Review","volume":"54 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the endosymbiont got its cell\",\"authors\":\"A. Poole\",\"doi\":\"10.26686/nzsr.v66.9440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite fundamental advances in cellular, molecular and genome biology, there is still surprisingly little consensus concerning the evolutionary origins of the eukaryote cell. While it is clear that the mitochondrion (responsible for generating much of the energy requirements of the eukaryote cell) has evolved from an endosymbiont cell of bacterial origin, the recent literature has borne witness to a tidal wave of speculative theories regarding the nature of the cell in which this bacterium took up residence. David Penny and I recently argued that much of this confusion can be avoided if models are grounded in known biological processes, and if speculation is tempered by formulating testable hypotheses. The most fanciful hypotheses are an inevitable casualty of a pragmatic approach, but what remains is a productive framework wherein biologically plausible alternatives can be evaluated without the need to invoke ad hoc events or processes, such as biological ‘big bangs’ or hitherto unobserved cell biological phenomena.\",\"PeriodicalId\":475845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand Science Review\",\"volume\":\"54 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26686/nzsr.v66.9440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/nzsr.v66.9440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管细胞、分子和基因组生物学取得了根本性的进展,但人们对真核细胞的进化起源仍然没有达成令人惊讶的共识。虽然线粒体(负责产生真核细胞所需的大部分能量)显然是由细菌起源的内共生细胞进化而来的,但最近的文献却见证了关于这种细菌所居住的细胞性质的各种猜测性理论的浪潮。戴维-彭尼(David Penny)和我最近提出,如果模型以已知的生物过程为基础,并通过提出可检验的假说来缓和推测,就可以避免这种混乱。最天马行空的假说是实用主义方法不可避免的牺牲品,但剩下的是一个富有成效的框架,在这个框架中,可以对生物学上可信的替代方案进行评估,而无需援引临时事件或过程,如生物 "大爆炸 "或迄今尚未观察到的细胞生物学现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How the endosymbiont got its cell
Despite fundamental advances in cellular, molecular and genome biology, there is still surprisingly little consensus concerning the evolutionary origins of the eukaryote cell. While it is clear that the mitochondrion (responsible for generating much of the energy requirements of the eukaryote cell) has evolved from an endosymbiont cell of bacterial origin, the recent literature has borne witness to a tidal wave of speculative theories regarding the nature of the cell in which this bacterium took up residence. David Penny and I recently argued that much of this confusion can be avoided if models are grounded in known biological processes, and if speculation is tempered by formulating testable hypotheses. The most fanciful hypotheses are an inevitable casualty of a pragmatic approach, but what remains is a productive framework wherein biologically plausible alternatives can be evaluated without the need to invoke ad hoc events or processes, such as biological ‘big bangs’ or hitherto unobserved cell biological phenomena.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信