多发性肋骨骨折和胸部外翻患者的手术治疗

B. Mayorov, M. V. Isaev, I. G. Belen’kii, G. Sergeev, A. N. Tulupov
{"title":"多发性肋骨骨折和胸部外翻患者的手术治疗","authors":"B. Mayorov, M. V. Isaev, I. G. Belen’kii, G. Sergeev, A. N. Tulupov","doi":"10.25016/2541-7487-2024-0-1-42-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Chest injuries are top third by incidence among body injuries and second top among causes of death in trauma patients. Over the last two decades, a few publications by foreign and Russian investigators have studied the advantages of early surgical rib cage stabilization over conservative treatment. However, by now the efficacy of active surgical strategy has not been convincingly proven in multiple rib fractures, including the use of standard plate osteosynthesis for small segments, as well as absorbable pins.The study objective is to present early results of surgical treatment of multiple rib fractures and rib valve using standard 1/3 tubular and reconstruction plates and absorbable pins in level 1 and 2 trauma centers without a referral thoracic surgery department.Methods. The study included 26 patients who underwent surgical rib cage stabilization for multiple rib fractures and/or flail chest in 2018–2023. Those included 15 patients with polytrauma (ISS over 17 points), 5 patients with combined trauma (ISS under 17 points), and 6 patients with isolated chest trauma. One-stage fixation of 1 to 5 ribs was performed.Results and analysis. The overall median of hospital stay was 16.5 (min. 6 to max 50) days, ICU stay was 3 (0 to 25) days, days of ventilation support was 0 (0 to 18) days, and need for oxygen support was 0 (0 to 16) days. The mean pleural cavity drain duration was (8.1 ± 3.8) days. Respiratory complications were observed in 11 % of cases. In 8 % of cases tracheostomy was required.Discussion. Active surgical strategy with rib osteosynthesis allows to quickly and effectively stabilize the condition of patients with severe thoracic trauma. Standard osteosynthesis plates for small segments with angular stability screws allow to achieve fixation stability of damaged ribs, contributing to the restoration of normal chest excursion, better pain syndrome control and prevention of complications. More profound studies of conventional osteosynthesis and various subtypes are required in the future to compare between the results of different osteosynthesis methods, on the one hand, and the results of surgical and conservative treatment, on the other hand.Conclusion. Absorbable pins and standard osteosynthesis plates (rather than special ones) in rib fractures enable quick stabilization of patients with severe chest injury.","PeriodicalId":518600,"journal":{"name":"Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations","volume":"77 1‐2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical treatment of patients with multiple rib fractures and flail chest\",\"authors\":\"B. Mayorov, M. V. Isaev, I. G. Belen’kii, G. Sergeev, A. N. Tulupov\",\"doi\":\"10.25016/2541-7487-2024-0-1-42-49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Chest injuries are top third by incidence among body injuries and second top among causes of death in trauma patients. Over the last two decades, a few publications by foreign and Russian investigators have studied the advantages of early surgical rib cage stabilization over conservative treatment. However, by now the efficacy of active surgical strategy has not been convincingly proven in multiple rib fractures, including the use of standard plate osteosynthesis for small segments, as well as absorbable pins.The study objective is to present early results of surgical treatment of multiple rib fractures and rib valve using standard 1/3 tubular and reconstruction plates and absorbable pins in level 1 and 2 trauma centers without a referral thoracic surgery department.Methods. The study included 26 patients who underwent surgical rib cage stabilization for multiple rib fractures and/or flail chest in 2018–2023. Those included 15 patients with polytrauma (ISS over 17 points), 5 patients with combined trauma (ISS under 17 points), and 6 patients with isolated chest trauma. One-stage fixation of 1 to 5 ribs was performed.Results and analysis. The overall median of hospital stay was 16.5 (min. 6 to max 50) days, ICU stay was 3 (0 to 25) days, days of ventilation support was 0 (0 to 18) days, and need for oxygen support was 0 (0 to 16) days. The mean pleural cavity drain duration was (8.1 ± 3.8) days. Respiratory complications were observed in 11 % of cases. In 8 % of cases tracheostomy was required.Discussion. Active surgical strategy with rib osteosynthesis allows to quickly and effectively stabilize the condition of patients with severe thoracic trauma. Standard osteosynthesis plates for small segments with angular stability screws allow to achieve fixation stability of damaged ribs, contributing to the restoration of normal chest excursion, better pain syndrome control and prevention of complications. More profound studies of conventional osteosynthesis and various subtypes are required in the future to compare between the results of different osteosynthesis methods, on the one hand, and the results of surgical and conservative treatment, on the other hand.Conclusion. Absorbable pins and standard osteosynthesis plates (rather than special ones) in rib fractures enable quick stabilization of patients with severe chest injury.\",\"PeriodicalId\":518600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations\",\"volume\":\"77 1‐2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25016/2541-7487-2024-0-1-42-49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25016/2541-7487-2024-0-1-42-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。胸部损伤在身体损伤中的发病率位居第三,在创伤患者的死亡原因中位居第二。在过去二十年中,外国和俄罗斯研究人员发表了一些文章,研究了早期手术稳定肋骨笼与保守治疗相比的优势。本研究旨在介绍在没有胸外科转诊的 1 级和 2 级创伤中心使用标准 1/3 管状和重建钢板以及可吸收钢钉对多发性肋骨骨折和肋骨瓣进行手术治疗的早期结果。研究纳入了2018-2023年因多发性肋骨骨折和/或外翻胸接受外科肋骨固定术的26例患者。其中包括15例多发创伤患者(ISS超过17分)、5例合并创伤患者(ISS低于17分)和6例孤立胸部创伤患者。对1至5根肋骨进行了一期固定。总体住院时间中位数为 16.5 天(最短 6 天,最长 50 天),重症监护室住院时间为 3 天(0 至 25 天),通气支持天数为 0 天(0 至 18 天),氧气支持需求为 0 天(0 至 16 天)。平均胸腔引流时间为(8.1 ± 3.8)天。11%的病例出现了呼吸系统并发症。8%的病例需要进行气管造口术。采用肋骨骨合成术的积极手术策略可以快速有效地稳定严重胸部创伤患者的病情。小节段的标准骨合成板与角度稳定螺钉可实现受损肋骨的固定稳定性,有助于恢复正常胸廓偏移、更好地控制疼痛综合征和预防并发症。未来需要对常规骨合成和各种亚型进行更深入的研究,一方面比较不同骨合成方法的效果,另一方面比较手术和保守治疗的效果。结论:在肋骨骨折中使用可吸收栓和标准骨合成板(而非特殊骨合成板)可快速稳定严重胸部损伤患者的病情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical treatment of patients with multiple rib fractures and flail chest
Introduction. Chest injuries are top third by incidence among body injuries and second top among causes of death in trauma patients. Over the last two decades, a few publications by foreign and Russian investigators have studied the advantages of early surgical rib cage stabilization over conservative treatment. However, by now the efficacy of active surgical strategy has not been convincingly proven in multiple rib fractures, including the use of standard plate osteosynthesis for small segments, as well as absorbable pins.The study objective is to present early results of surgical treatment of multiple rib fractures and rib valve using standard 1/3 tubular and reconstruction plates and absorbable pins in level 1 and 2 trauma centers without a referral thoracic surgery department.Methods. The study included 26 patients who underwent surgical rib cage stabilization for multiple rib fractures and/or flail chest in 2018–2023. Those included 15 patients with polytrauma (ISS over 17 points), 5 patients with combined trauma (ISS under 17 points), and 6 patients with isolated chest trauma. One-stage fixation of 1 to 5 ribs was performed.Results and analysis. The overall median of hospital stay was 16.5 (min. 6 to max 50) days, ICU stay was 3 (0 to 25) days, days of ventilation support was 0 (0 to 18) days, and need for oxygen support was 0 (0 to 16) days. The mean pleural cavity drain duration was (8.1 ± 3.8) days. Respiratory complications were observed in 11 % of cases. In 8 % of cases tracheostomy was required.Discussion. Active surgical strategy with rib osteosynthesis allows to quickly and effectively stabilize the condition of patients with severe thoracic trauma. Standard osteosynthesis plates for small segments with angular stability screws allow to achieve fixation stability of damaged ribs, contributing to the restoration of normal chest excursion, better pain syndrome control and prevention of complications. More profound studies of conventional osteosynthesis and various subtypes are required in the future to compare between the results of different osteosynthesis methods, on the one hand, and the results of surgical and conservative treatment, on the other hand.Conclusion. Absorbable pins and standard osteosynthesis plates (rather than special ones) in rib fractures enable quick stabilization of patients with severe chest injury.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信