健康应用程序审查工具 (HART):通过专家组审查进行内容验证。

Sungwoo Moon, Krista Best, Yong K Choi, Julie M. Faieta
{"title":"健康应用程序审查工具 (HART):通过专家组审查进行内容验证。","authors":"Sungwoo Moon, Krista Best, Yong K Choi, Julie M. Faieta","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2024.2337857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Health App Review Tool (HART) is an evaluation tool that is designed to help the users in evaluation of the health apps for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) population. As the development of the HART continues, the domain items that HART addresses require evaluation to determine if they meet the intended required criteria for the users.To complete content validation of the HART 10 health care professions provided content validation of the HART via a content validation form. Specifically, data collection took place virtually through Microsoft Teams and Qualtrics-based content validity index. Following, revisions were made through a consensus process involving 3 rehabilitation experts, minimizing potential conflicts.Findings indicate 76 of 109 items were considered acceptable, 19 items were in need of review and 14 items in need of revision. In sum 30% of the total HART items required either review or revision to improve HART validity. The changes were implemented through consensus revisions.","PeriodicalId":282300,"journal":{"name":"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA","volume":"214 3","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health App Review Tool (HART): content validation through expert panel review.\",\"authors\":\"Sungwoo Moon, Krista Best, Yong K Choi, Julie M. Faieta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10400435.2024.2337857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Health App Review Tool (HART) is an evaluation tool that is designed to help the users in evaluation of the health apps for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) population. As the development of the HART continues, the domain items that HART addresses require evaluation to determine if they meet the intended required criteria for the users.To complete content validation of the HART 10 health care professions provided content validation of the HART via a content validation form. Specifically, data collection took place virtually through Microsoft Teams and Qualtrics-based content validity index. Following, revisions were made through a consensus process involving 3 rehabilitation experts, minimizing potential conflicts.Findings indicate 76 of 109 items were considered acceptable, 19 items were in need of review and 14 items in need of revision. In sum 30% of the total HART items required either review or revision to improve HART validity. The changes were implemented through consensus revisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA\",\"volume\":\"214 3\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2024.2337857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2024.2337857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

健康应用程序审查工具(HART)是一种评估工具,旨在帮助用户评估阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)人群的健康应用程序。随着 HART 的不断发展,HART 所涉及的领域项目需要进行评估,以确定它们是否符合用户的预期要求标准。为了完成 HART 的内容验证,10 名医疗保健专业人员通过内容验证表对 HART 进行了内容验证。具体来说,数据收集是通过 Microsoft Teams 和基于 Qualtrics 的内容验证指数进行的。结果显示,109 个项目中有 76 个被认为是可接受的,19 个项目需要审查,14 个项目需要修订。总之,30% 的 HART 项目需要复查或修订,以提高 HART 的有效性。这些修改是通过协商一致的修订来实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health App Review Tool (HART): content validation through expert panel review.
The Health App Review Tool (HART) is an evaluation tool that is designed to help the users in evaluation of the health apps for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) population. As the development of the HART continues, the domain items that HART addresses require evaluation to determine if they meet the intended required criteria for the users.To complete content validation of the HART 10 health care professions provided content validation of the HART via a content validation form. Specifically, data collection took place virtually through Microsoft Teams and Qualtrics-based content validity index. Following, revisions were made through a consensus process involving 3 rehabilitation experts, minimizing potential conflicts.Findings indicate 76 of 109 items were considered acceptable, 19 items were in need of review and 14 items in need of revision. In sum 30% of the total HART items required either review or revision to improve HART validity. The changes were implemented through consensus revisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信