经过不同蛋壳处理和储存时间的商品蛋的内部质量

Dayane dos Santos Almeida, Afs Bedin, L. Miletti, C.E. Gewehr
{"title":"经过不同蛋壳处理和储存时间的商品蛋的内部质量","authors":"Dayane dos Santos Almeida, Afs Bedin, L. Miletti, C.E. Gewehr","doi":"10.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Five hundred sixty eggs from commercial layers aged 74 weeks were subjected to sanitization and shell-covering procedures. The treatments consisted of two egg sanitization methods, sanitized (S) and not sanitized (NS), and two methods of shell covering, not covered (NC) and covered (C) with whey protein concentrate solution, arranged in a completely randomized design in a 2 × 2 factorial scheme (sanitization × shell coating), with five replications obtained from the average of four eggs evaluated in seven storage periods (1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days). Albumen pH and yolk lipid oxidation using the TBARS test were evaluated. The averages for each period were submitted to analysis of variance, any differences observed were submitted to the Tukey test (5%), and regression analysis was performed between periods for each method. Using SDS-PAGE, the protein profile of albumen at 1 and 42 days was evaluated descriptively. Using methods S and NS, the pH and TBARS of eggs did not change on any of the days evaluated (P>0.05). Methods C and NC had similar pH values (P>0.05) only when using fresh eggs; however, the pH was higher when using eggs from Method NC (P<0.0001) compared with Method C. For all techniques, the analysis of pH regression between periods revealed quadratic behavior. While regression analysis demonstrated an increasing linear behavior for all methods, the TBARS analysis results for C and NC on all evaluated days were comparable (P>0.05). Whey protein concentrate does not affect the pH of sanitized eggs. The protein profile of the albumen and TBARS values of egg yolks stored at room temperature are unaffected by sanitation and whey protein concentrate covering, and TBARS values increase over storage days in all cases.","PeriodicalId":21921,"journal":{"name":"Semina: Ciências Agrárias","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal quality of commercial eggs subjected to different shell treatments and storage times\",\"authors\":\"Dayane dos Santos Almeida, Afs Bedin, L. Miletti, C.E. Gewehr\",\"doi\":\"10.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Five hundred sixty eggs from commercial layers aged 74 weeks were subjected to sanitization and shell-covering procedures. The treatments consisted of two egg sanitization methods, sanitized (S) and not sanitized (NS), and two methods of shell covering, not covered (NC) and covered (C) with whey protein concentrate solution, arranged in a completely randomized design in a 2 × 2 factorial scheme (sanitization × shell coating), with five replications obtained from the average of four eggs evaluated in seven storage periods (1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days). Albumen pH and yolk lipid oxidation using the TBARS test were evaluated. The averages for each period were submitted to analysis of variance, any differences observed were submitted to the Tukey test (5%), and regression analysis was performed between periods for each method. Using SDS-PAGE, the protein profile of albumen at 1 and 42 days was evaluated descriptively. Using methods S and NS, the pH and TBARS of eggs did not change on any of the days evaluated (P>0.05). Methods C and NC had similar pH values (P>0.05) only when using fresh eggs; however, the pH was higher when using eggs from Method NC (P<0.0001) compared with Method C. For all techniques, the analysis of pH regression between periods revealed quadratic behavior. While regression analysis demonstrated an increasing linear behavior for all methods, the TBARS analysis results for C and NC on all evaluated days were comparable (P>0.05). Whey protein concentrate does not affect the pH of sanitized eggs. The protein profile of the albumen and TBARS values of egg yolks stored at room temperature are unaffected by sanitation and whey protein concentrate covering, and TBARS values increase over storage days in all cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Semina: Ciências Agrárias\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Semina: Ciências Agrárias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semina: Ciências Agrárias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对来自 74 周龄商品蛋鸡的 560 枚鸡蛋进行了消毒和蛋壳覆盖处理。处理包括两种鸡蛋消毒方法:消毒(S)和不消毒(NS),以及两种蛋壳覆盖方法:不覆盖(NC)和用浓缩乳清蛋白溶液覆盖(C),采用完全随机设计的 2 × 2 因子方案(消毒 × 蛋壳覆盖),五个重复取自四个鸡蛋在七个储存期(1、7、14、21、28、35 和 42 天)的平均值。使用 TBARS 测试法评估了白蛋白 pH 值和蛋黄脂质氧化情况。对每个时期的平均值进行方差分析,观察到的任何差异都要进行 Tukey 检验(5%),并对每种方法的不同时期进行回归分析。使用 SDS-PAGE 对 1 天和 42 天的白蛋白蛋白质概况进行描述性评估。使用 S 和 NS 方法,鸡蛋的 pH 值和 TBARS 在任何评估天数都没有变化(P>0.05)。只有使用新鲜鸡蛋时,方法 C 和 NC 的 pH 值相似(P>0.05);但使用方法 NC 的鸡蛋时,pH 值更高(P0.05)。浓缩乳清蛋白不会影响消毒鸡蛋的 pH 值。在室温下贮存的蛋黄的蛋白图谱和 TBARS 值不受卫生条件和乳清浓缩蛋白覆盖物的影响,在所有情况下,TBARS 值都会随着贮存天数的增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internal quality of commercial eggs subjected to different shell treatments and storage times
Five hundred sixty eggs from commercial layers aged 74 weeks were subjected to sanitization and shell-covering procedures. The treatments consisted of two egg sanitization methods, sanitized (S) and not sanitized (NS), and two methods of shell covering, not covered (NC) and covered (C) with whey protein concentrate solution, arranged in a completely randomized design in a 2 × 2 factorial scheme (sanitization × shell coating), with five replications obtained from the average of four eggs evaluated in seven storage periods (1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days). Albumen pH and yolk lipid oxidation using the TBARS test were evaluated. The averages for each period were submitted to analysis of variance, any differences observed were submitted to the Tukey test (5%), and regression analysis was performed between periods for each method. Using SDS-PAGE, the protein profile of albumen at 1 and 42 days was evaluated descriptively. Using methods S and NS, the pH and TBARS of eggs did not change on any of the days evaluated (P>0.05). Methods C and NC had similar pH values (P>0.05) only when using fresh eggs; however, the pH was higher when using eggs from Method NC (P<0.0001) compared with Method C. For all techniques, the analysis of pH regression between periods revealed quadratic behavior. While regression analysis demonstrated an increasing linear behavior for all methods, the TBARS analysis results for C and NC on all evaluated days were comparable (P>0.05). Whey protein concentrate does not affect the pH of sanitized eggs. The protein profile of the albumen and TBARS values of egg yolks stored at room temperature are unaffected by sanitation and whey protein concentrate covering, and TBARS values increase over storage days in all cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信