后期暗能量参数化能否调和哈勃张力?

Mingjian Zhang, Li Chen, Maoyou Yang, Junmei Wang
{"title":"后期暗能量参数化能否调和哈勃张力?","authors":"Mingjian Zhang, Li Chen, Maoyou Yang, Junmei Wang","doi":"10.1088/1674-1137/ad3f95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, we construct ten dark energy models to test whether they can reconcile the Hubble tension and how much is it affected by parameterization. To provide a fair test, the models are rich including fractional form, logarithm form, exponential form, inverse exponential form and several non-parameterized models. The dataset we use are the NPIPE pipeline of cosmic microwave background (CMB) power-spectrum data from \\pl2020, Pantheon+ samples from Supernovae Type Ia, and baryon acoustic oscillation. They MCMC calculation implies the dark energy transferring from $w< -1$ to $w > -1$, for the four parameterized dark energy models. However, they are unable to reconcile the Hubble tension well. Importantly, we find that the phantom-like dark energy with $w < -1$ best can reduce the Hubble tension to $0.1808\\sigma$. However, the AIC analysis indicates that this alleviation is at the cost of high AIC. We also investigate the effect of constructions on the derivative of equation of state $dw/da$, cosmic density parameter, CMB power spectrum $C^{TT}$ and matter spectra $P(k)$. We also find that Hubble tension may be related to the reionization process.","PeriodicalId":504778,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Physics C","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whether the late dark energy parameterization can reconcile the Hubble tension?\",\"authors\":\"Mingjian Zhang, Li Chen, Maoyou Yang, Junmei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1674-1137/ad3f95\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this paper, we construct ten dark energy models to test whether they can reconcile the Hubble tension and how much is it affected by parameterization. To provide a fair test, the models are rich including fractional form, logarithm form, exponential form, inverse exponential form and several non-parameterized models. The dataset we use are the NPIPE pipeline of cosmic microwave background (CMB) power-spectrum data from \\\\pl2020, Pantheon+ samples from Supernovae Type Ia, and baryon acoustic oscillation. They MCMC calculation implies the dark energy transferring from $w< -1$ to $w > -1$, for the four parameterized dark energy models. However, they are unable to reconcile the Hubble tension well. Importantly, we find that the phantom-like dark energy with $w < -1$ best can reduce the Hubble tension to $0.1808\\\\sigma$. However, the AIC analysis indicates that this alleviation is at the cost of high AIC. We also investigate the effect of constructions on the derivative of equation of state $dw/da$, cosmic density parameter, CMB power spectrum $C^{TT}$ and matter spectra $P(k)$. We also find that Hubble tension may be related to the reionization process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Physics C\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Physics C\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ad3f95\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Physics C","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ad3f95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们构建了十个暗能量模型,以检验它们是否能调和哈勃张力,以及参数化对其影响有多大。为了提供一个公平的测试,模型的形式非常丰富,包括分数形式、对数形式、指数形式、反指数形式和几个非参数化模型。我们使用的数据集是来自pl2020的宇宙微波背景(CMB)功率谱数据的NPIPE管道、来自Ia型超新星的Pantheon+样本以及重子声振荡。他们的MCMC计算暗示,对于四个参数化暗能量模型,暗能量从$w<-1$转移到$w>-1$。然而,他们无法很好地协调哈勃张力。重要的是,我们发现w<-1$的幽灵般的暗能量最能把哈勃张力降低到0.1808/sigma$。然而,AIC分析表明,这种缓解是以高AIC为代价的。我们还研究了构造对状态方程导数$dw/da$、宇宙密度参数、CMB功率谱$C^{TT}$和物质谱$P(k)$的影响。我们还发现哈勃张力可能与再电离过程有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whether the late dark energy parameterization can reconcile the Hubble tension?
In this paper, we construct ten dark energy models to test whether they can reconcile the Hubble tension and how much is it affected by parameterization. To provide a fair test, the models are rich including fractional form, logarithm form, exponential form, inverse exponential form and several non-parameterized models. The dataset we use are the NPIPE pipeline of cosmic microwave background (CMB) power-spectrum data from \pl2020, Pantheon+ samples from Supernovae Type Ia, and baryon acoustic oscillation. They MCMC calculation implies the dark energy transferring from $w< -1$ to $w > -1$, for the four parameterized dark energy models. However, they are unable to reconcile the Hubble tension well. Importantly, we find that the phantom-like dark energy with $w < -1$ best can reduce the Hubble tension to $0.1808\sigma$. However, the AIC analysis indicates that this alleviation is at the cost of high AIC. We also investigate the effect of constructions on the derivative of equation of state $dw/da$, cosmic density parameter, CMB power spectrum $C^{TT}$ and matter spectra $P(k)$. We also find that Hubble tension may be related to the reionization process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信