Dor Hadida Barzilai, M. Cohen-Shelly, Vera Sorin, Eyal Zimlichman, E. Massalha, Thomas G Allison, Eyal Klang
{"title":"心脏压力测试解读中的机器学习:系统回顾","authors":"Dor Hadida Barzilai, M. Cohen-Shelly, Vera Sorin, Eyal Zimlichman, E. Massalha, Thomas G Allison, Eyal Klang","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading health challenge worldwide. Exercise stress testing is a foundational non-invasive diagnostic tool. Nonetheless, its variable accuracy prompts the exploration of more reliable methods. Recent advances in machine learning (ML), including deep learning (DL) and natural language processing (NLP), have shown potential in refining the interpretation of stress testing data.\n \n \n \n Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of ML applications in stress electrocardiogram (ECG) and stress echocardiography for CAD prognosis. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used as databases. We analysed the ML models, outcomes, and performance metrics.\n \n \n \n Overall, seven relevant studies were identified.\n ML application in stress ECGs resulted in sensitivity and specificity improvements. Some models achieved above 96% in both metrics and reducing false positives by up to 21%. In stress echocardiography, ML models demonstrated an increase in diagnostic precision. Some models achieved specificity and sensitivity rates of up to 92.7% and 84.4%, respectively. NLP applications enabled categorization of stress echocardiography reports, with accuracies nearing 98%. Limitations include a small, retrospective study pool and the exclusion of nuclear stress testing, due to its well-documented status.\n \n \n \n This review indicates AI applications potential in refining CAD stress testing assessment. Further development for real-world use is warranted.\n","PeriodicalId":508387,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning in Cardiac Stress Test Interpretation: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Dor Hadida Barzilai, M. Cohen-Shelly, Vera Sorin, Eyal Zimlichman, E. Massalha, Thomas G Allison, Eyal Klang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading health challenge worldwide. Exercise stress testing is a foundational non-invasive diagnostic tool. Nonetheless, its variable accuracy prompts the exploration of more reliable methods. Recent advances in machine learning (ML), including deep learning (DL) and natural language processing (NLP), have shown potential in refining the interpretation of stress testing data.\\n \\n \\n \\n Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of ML applications in stress electrocardiogram (ECG) and stress echocardiography for CAD prognosis. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used as databases. We analysed the ML models, outcomes, and performance metrics.\\n \\n \\n \\n Overall, seven relevant studies were identified.\\n ML application in stress ECGs resulted in sensitivity and specificity improvements. Some models achieved above 96% in both metrics and reducing false positives by up to 21%. In stress echocardiography, ML models demonstrated an increase in diagnostic precision. Some models achieved specificity and sensitivity rates of up to 92.7% and 84.4%, respectively. NLP applications enabled categorization of stress echocardiography reports, with accuracies nearing 98%. Limitations include a small, retrospective study pool and the exclusion of nuclear stress testing, due to its well-documented status.\\n \\n \\n \\n This review indicates AI applications potential in refining CAD stress testing assessment. Further development for real-world use is warranted.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":508387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Digital Health\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Digital Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是全球面临的主要健康挑战。运动压力测试是一种基本的无创诊断工具。然而,其准确性参差不齐,这促使人们探索更可靠的方法。机器学习(ML)领域的最新进展,包括深度学习(DL)和自然语言处理(NLP),已显示出完善压力测试数据解读的潜力。 根据 PRISMA 指南,我们对压力心电图(ECG)和压力超声心动图中用于 CAD 预后的 ML 应用进行了系统性回顾。我们使用了 MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 作为数据库。我们分析了 ML 模型、结果和性能指标。 总共确定了七项相关研究。在压力心电图中应用 ML 提高了灵敏度和特异性。一些模型在这两项指标上都达到了 96% 以上,并将假阳性降低了 21%。在负荷超声心动图中,ML 模型提高了诊断精确度。一些模型的特异性和灵敏度分别高达 92.7% 和 84.4%。NLP 应用实现了压力超声心动图报告的分类,准确率接近 98%。不足之处包括:回顾性研究的规模较小,而且由于核应力测试的地位已得到充分证明,因此未将其包括在内。 本综述显示了人工智能在完善 CAD 压力测试评估方面的应用潜力。有必要进一步开发用于真实世界。
Machine Learning in Cardiac Stress Test Interpretation: A Systematic Review
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading health challenge worldwide. Exercise stress testing is a foundational non-invasive diagnostic tool. Nonetheless, its variable accuracy prompts the exploration of more reliable methods. Recent advances in machine learning (ML), including deep learning (DL) and natural language processing (NLP), have shown potential in refining the interpretation of stress testing data.
Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of ML applications in stress electrocardiogram (ECG) and stress echocardiography for CAD prognosis. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used as databases. We analysed the ML models, outcomes, and performance metrics.
Overall, seven relevant studies were identified.
ML application in stress ECGs resulted in sensitivity and specificity improvements. Some models achieved above 96% in both metrics and reducing false positives by up to 21%. In stress echocardiography, ML models demonstrated an increase in diagnostic precision. Some models achieved specificity and sensitivity rates of up to 92.7% and 84.4%, respectively. NLP applications enabled categorization of stress echocardiography reports, with accuracies nearing 98%. Limitations include a small, retrospective study pool and the exclusion of nuclear stress testing, due to its well-documented status.
This review indicates AI applications potential in refining CAD stress testing assessment. Further development for real-world use is warranted.