高级机器人辅助盆腔手术的个性化阿片类镇痛方案

A. D. Lifanova, A. A. Grazhdankin, P. Mironov, I. Lutfarakhmanov
{"title":"高级机器人辅助盆腔手术的个性化阿片类镇痛方案","authors":"A. D. Lifanova, A. A. Grazhdankin, P. Mironov, I. Lutfarakhmanov","doi":"10.24884/2078-5658-2024-21-2-18-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of a personalized opioid-sparing pain relief protocol in the context of enhanced rehabilitation after advanced robot-assisted pelvic surgery.Materials and methods. The prospective study included 19 patients who underwent surgery under combined thoracic epidural anesthesia/analgesia: general anesthesia was administered with propofol or sevoflurane/desflurane with ketamine + 6–8 ml/hour of 0.25% ropivacaine, in the postoperative period 0.125% bupivacaine was administered at a rate of 8–15 ml/hour. In the comparison group (n = 21), opioids were used as a component of general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia. Intra- and postoperative opioid consumption, pain severity, opioid-related side effects, and timing of postoperative rehabilitation were evaluated.Results. In the study group, the median milligram equivalents of morphine were significantly lower than in the control group (103 versus 148 and 91 versus 404, respectively; p = 0.001 for both comparisons). The values of the numerical pain scale did not differ significantly between the groups. Side effects were significantly lower in the treatment group (26% vs. 62%; p = 0.026). There were significant differences in the timing of intestinal function recovery, initiation of regular diet and transfer from the recovery room in favor of opioid-sparing pain relief (p = 0.037; p = 0.046; and p = 0.023; respectively).Conclusions. The use of a personalized opioid-sparing pain relief protocol in the context of enhanced rehabilitation of patients underwent the advanced robot-assisted pelvic surgery helped to reduce opioid consumption, side effects, and postoperative rehabilitation without affecting the severity of pain. ","PeriodicalId":506088,"journal":{"name":"Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized opioid-sparing pain relief protocol for advanced robot-assisted pelvic surgery\",\"authors\":\"A. D. Lifanova, A. A. Grazhdankin, P. Mironov, I. Lutfarakhmanov\",\"doi\":\"10.24884/2078-5658-2024-21-2-18-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of a personalized opioid-sparing pain relief protocol in the context of enhanced rehabilitation after advanced robot-assisted pelvic surgery.Materials and methods. The prospective study included 19 patients who underwent surgery under combined thoracic epidural anesthesia/analgesia: general anesthesia was administered with propofol or sevoflurane/desflurane with ketamine + 6–8 ml/hour of 0.25% ropivacaine, in the postoperative period 0.125% bupivacaine was administered at a rate of 8–15 ml/hour. In the comparison group (n = 21), opioids were used as a component of general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia. Intra- and postoperative opioid consumption, pain severity, opioid-related side effects, and timing of postoperative rehabilitation were evaluated.Results. In the study group, the median milligram equivalents of morphine were significantly lower than in the control group (103 versus 148 and 91 versus 404, respectively; p = 0.001 for both comparisons). The values of the numerical pain scale did not differ significantly between the groups. Side effects were significantly lower in the treatment group (26% vs. 62%; p = 0.026). There were significant differences in the timing of intestinal function recovery, initiation of regular diet and transfer from the recovery room in favor of opioid-sparing pain relief (p = 0.037; p = 0.046; and p = 0.023; respectively).Conclusions. The use of a personalized opioid-sparing pain relief protocol in the context of enhanced rehabilitation of patients underwent the advanced robot-assisted pelvic surgery helped to reduce opioid consumption, side effects, and postoperative rehabilitation without affecting the severity of pain. \",\"PeriodicalId\":506088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION\",\"volume\":\" 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2024-21-2-18-26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2024-21-2-18-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的是研究在高级机器人辅助盆腔手术后加强康复的背景下,个性化阿片类药物稀释镇痛方案的安全性和有效性。这项前瞻性研究纳入了19名在胸硬膜外联合麻醉/镇痛下接受手术的患者:使用丙泊酚或七氟醚/地氟醚加氯胺酮+6-8毫升/小时的0.25%罗哌卡因进行全身麻醉,术后以8-15毫升/小时的速度使用0.125%布比卡因。在对比组(n = 21)中,阿片类药物被用作全身麻醉和多模式镇痛的组成部分。对术中和术后阿片类药物消耗量、疼痛严重程度、阿片类药物相关副作用以及术后康复时间进行了评估。研究组的吗啡毫克当量中位数明显低于对照组(分别为103对148和91对404;两组比较P = 0.001)。两组的疼痛数值量表没有明显差异。治疗组的副作用明显较低(26% 对 62%;P = 0.026)。在肠道功能恢复、开始正常饮食和转出恢复室的时间上,阿片类药物保留止痛法与阿片类药物保留止痛法存在明显差异(分别为 p = 0.037;p = 0.046;p = 0.023)。在对接受高级机器人辅助盆腔手术的患者加强康复治疗的背景下,使用个性化的阿片类药物镇痛方案有助于减少阿片类药物的用量、副作用和术后康复,而不会影响疼痛的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personalized opioid-sparing pain relief protocol for advanced robot-assisted pelvic surgery
The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of a personalized opioid-sparing pain relief protocol in the context of enhanced rehabilitation after advanced robot-assisted pelvic surgery.Materials and methods. The prospective study included 19 patients who underwent surgery under combined thoracic epidural anesthesia/analgesia: general anesthesia was administered with propofol or sevoflurane/desflurane with ketamine + 6–8 ml/hour of 0.25% ropivacaine, in the postoperative period 0.125% bupivacaine was administered at a rate of 8–15 ml/hour. In the comparison group (n = 21), opioids were used as a component of general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia. Intra- and postoperative opioid consumption, pain severity, opioid-related side effects, and timing of postoperative rehabilitation were evaluated.Results. In the study group, the median milligram equivalents of morphine were significantly lower than in the control group (103 versus 148 and 91 versus 404, respectively; p = 0.001 for both comparisons). The values of the numerical pain scale did not differ significantly between the groups. Side effects were significantly lower in the treatment group (26% vs. 62%; p = 0.026). There were significant differences in the timing of intestinal function recovery, initiation of regular diet and transfer from the recovery room in favor of opioid-sparing pain relief (p = 0.037; p = 0.046; and p = 0.023; respectively).Conclusions. The use of a personalized opioid-sparing pain relief protocol in the context of enhanced rehabilitation of patients underwent the advanced robot-assisted pelvic surgery helped to reduce opioid consumption, side effects, and postoperative rehabilitation without affecting the severity of pain. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信