{"title":"人民教育出版社版与京畿道教育厅版初中数学教科书比较研究》：以相似三角形为例","authors":"Jiaxuan Huang, Xie Lan, Zhengyuan Xie, Wen Yang, Zhongyan Shen, Ye Lixia","doi":"10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i51376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Similar triangles of junior high school mathematics textbooks from Chinese People's Education Press Version and Korean Gyeonggi Province Department of Education Version were selected for the study. The methods of literature study, content analysis and comparative study were utilized to compare the content of similar triangles in the two sets of textbooks from different aspects and dimensions. In the end, the study found that the People's Education Press Version was more complete in depth and breadth, but lacked interest, and the Gyeonggi Province Department of Education Version used the context well, but the knowledge content was relatively shallow.","PeriodicalId":262869,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Junior High School Mathematics Textbooks between People's Education Press Version and Gyeonggi Province Department of Education Version: The Case of Similar Triangles\",\"authors\":\"Jiaxuan Huang, Xie Lan, Zhengyuan Xie, Wen Yang, Zhongyan Shen, Ye Lixia\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i51376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Similar triangles of junior high school mathematics textbooks from Chinese People's Education Press Version and Korean Gyeonggi Province Department of Education Version were selected for the study. The methods of literature study, content analysis and comparative study were utilized to compare the content of similar triangles in the two sets of textbooks from different aspects and dimensions. In the end, the study found that the People's Education Press Version was more complete in depth and breadth, but lacked interest, and the Gyeonggi Province Department of Education Version used the context well, but the knowledge content was relatively shallow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i51376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i51376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Study of Junior High School Mathematics Textbooks between People's Education Press Version and Gyeonggi Province Department of Education Version: The Case of Similar Triangles
Similar triangles of junior high school mathematics textbooks from Chinese People's Education Press Version and Korean Gyeonggi Province Department of Education Version were selected for the study. The methods of literature study, content analysis and comparative study were utilized to compare the content of similar triangles in the two sets of textbooks from different aspects and dimensions. In the end, the study found that the People's Education Press Version was more complete in depth and breadth, but lacked interest, and the Gyeonggi Province Department of Education Version used the context well, but the knowledge content was relatively shallow.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
