国际组织在塑造习惯国际法中的作用:对 2018 年国际法委员会结论草案的分析研究

Zeyad Jaffal
{"title":"国际组织在塑造习惯国际法中的作用:对 2018 年国际法委员会结论草案的分析研究","authors":"Zeyad Jaffal","doi":"10.54536/ajsl.v3i1.2478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research explores the influence and impact of international organisations on the development and formation of customary international law. It specifically examines the 2018 Draft Conclusions issued by the International Law Commission (ILC). This paper has observed the implications of these findings on the evolution of peremptory norms, also known as jus cogens, and clarifies the scientific approaches used in their identification and legal consequences. Moreover, it emphasises alternative methodologies within the realm of humanitarian action in influencing customary international law. Research offers a thorough comprehension of which international organisations contribute to the development of customary international law. The (ILC)’s 2018 Draft Conclusions shape customary international law by defining peremptory norms (jus cogens). State practice and opinio juris produce conventional rules, as these findings show. They also help evaluate governmental announcements, official publications, legal opinions, and diplomatic exchanges. These results must be assessed for compliance with customary law, state practice, and state behaviour. Alternative analyses like humanitarian intervention and R2P also shape customary international law.","PeriodicalId":330539,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Society and Law","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of International Organizations in Shaping Customary International Law: An Analytical Study of the 2018 ILC’s Draft Conclusions\",\"authors\":\"Zeyad Jaffal\",\"doi\":\"10.54536/ajsl.v3i1.2478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research explores the influence and impact of international organisations on the development and formation of customary international law. It specifically examines the 2018 Draft Conclusions issued by the International Law Commission (ILC). This paper has observed the implications of these findings on the evolution of peremptory norms, also known as jus cogens, and clarifies the scientific approaches used in their identification and legal consequences. Moreover, it emphasises alternative methodologies within the realm of humanitarian action in influencing customary international law. Research offers a thorough comprehension of which international organisations contribute to the development of customary international law. The (ILC)’s 2018 Draft Conclusions shape customary international law by defining peremptory norms (jus cogens). State practice and opinio juris produce conventional rules, as these findings show. They also help evaluate governmental announcements, official publications, legal opinions, and diplomatic exchanges. These results must be assessed for compliance with customary law, state practice, and state behaviour. Alternative analyses like humanitarian intervention and R2P also shape customary international law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Society and Law\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Society and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v3i1.2478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Society and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v3i1.2478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了国际组织对习惯国际法的发展和形成的影响和作用。它特别研究了国际法委员会(ILC)发布的《2018 年结论草案》。本文观察了这些结论对强制性规范(又称强制法)演变的影响,并阐明了用于确定强制性规范及其法律后果的科学方法。此外,本文还强调了影响习惯国际法的人道主义行动领域的替代方法。研究透彻地理解了哪些国际组织有助于习惯国际法的发展。国际法委员会)2018 年结论草案通过定义强制性规范(强制法)来塑造习惯国际法。正如这些结论所示,国家实践和法律确信产生了常规规则。它们还有助于评估政府公告、官方出版物、法律意见和外交交流。必须评估这些结果是否符合习惯法、国家实践和国家行为。人道主义干预和保护责任等另类分析也塑造了习惯国际法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of International Organizations in Shaping Customary International Law: An Analytical Study of the 2018 ILC’s Draft Conclusions
This research explores the influence and impact of international organisations on the development and formation of customary international law. It specifically examines the 2018 Draft Conclusions issued by the International Law Commission (ILC). This paper has observed the implications of these findings on the evolution of peremptory norms, also known as jus cogens, and clarifies the scientific approaches used in their identification and legal consequences. Moreover, it emphasises alternative methodologies within the realm of humanitarian action in influencing customary international law. Research offers a thorough comprehension of which international organisations contribute to the development of customary international law. The (ILC)’s 2018 Draft Conclusions shape customary international law by defining peremptory norms (jus cogens). State practice and opinio juris produce conventional rules, as these findings show. They also help evaluate governmental announcements, official publications, legal opinions, and diplomatic exchanges. These results must be assessed for compliance with customary law, state practice, and state behaviour. Alternative analyses like humanitarian intervention and R2P also shape customary international law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信