{"title":"作为中国农村发展政策的地方品牌:光山县案例","authors":"Yingju Zhang, Saimin Liu, Giovanni Baldi","doi":"10.1108/dprg-02-2023-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis paper aims to explore the rationale, the process and the outcomes and risks of place branding in rural China.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAn in-depth case study analysis, including interviews, has been conducted.\n\nFindings\nPlace branding in the case of China is practiced and dominated through administrative entities by using subsidies and regional development programs to coordinate, organize and promote local agricultural resources. Although this government-led place branding has effective effects on rural development, it is unsustainable and unstable because it lacks sufficient market and stakeholder participation.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe effectiveness of place branding in China has been examined and proved.\n\nPractical implications\nThe government’s role in place branding in China should be adjusted. The government should position itself as a service and auxiliary role. Simultaneously, it should strengthen market-oriented operations and stakeholder participation in place branding.\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper is one of the first contributions to examine the impact of place branding as a rural development policy tool in China, and the in-depth case study examines and proves the effectiveness of place branding in rural China.\n","PeriodicalId":515139,"journal":{"name":"Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance","volume":" 52","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Place branding as rural development policy in China: the case of Guangshan county\",\"authors\":\"Yingju Zhang, Saimin Liu, Giovanni Baldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dprg-02-2023-0032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose\\nThis paper aims to explore the rationale, the process and the outcomes and risks of place branding in rural China.\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nAn in-depth case study analysis, including interviews, has been conducted.\\n\\nFindings\\nPlace branding in the case of China is practiced and dominated through administrative entities by using subsidies and regional development programs to coordinate, organize and promote local agricultural resources. Although this government-led place branding has effective effects on rural development, it is unsustainable and unstable because it lacks sufficient market and stakeholder participation.\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe effectiveness of place branding in China has been examined and proved.\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe government’s role in place branding in China should be adjusted. The government should position itself as a service and auxiliary role. Simultaneously, it should strengthen market-oriented operations and stakeholder participation in place branding.\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper is one of the first contributions to examine the impact of place branding as a rural development policy tool in China, and the in-depth case study examines and proves the effectiveness of place branding in rural China.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":515139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance\",\"volume\":\" 52\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-02-2023-0032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-02-2023-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Place branding as rural development policy in China: the case of Guangshan county
Purpose
This paper aims to explore the rationale, the process and the outcomes and risks of place branding in rural China.
Design/methodology/approach
An in-depth case study analysis, including interviews, has been conducted.
Findings
Place branding in the case of China is practiced and dominated through administrative entities by using subsidies and regional development programs to coordinate, organize and promote local agricultural resources. Although this government-led place branding has effective effects on rural development, it is unsustainable and unstable because it lacks sufficient market and stakeholder participation.
Research limitations/implications
The effectiveness of place branding in China has been examined and proved.
Practical implications
The government’s role in place branding in China should be adjusted. The government should position itself as a service and auxiliary role. Simultaneously, it should strengthen market-oriented operations and stakeholder participation in place branding.
Originality/value
This paper is one of the first contributions to examine the impact of place branding as a rural development policy tool in China, and the in-depth case study examines and proves the effectiveness of place branding in rural China.