自由意志怀疑论、隔离与矫正

Diametros Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.33392/diam.1952

John Lemos

{"title":"自由意志怀疑论、隔离与矫正","authors":"John Lemos","doi":"10.33392/diam.1952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares the quarantine model of criminal justice advocated by Derk Pereboom and Gregg Caruso with the corrections model of criminal justice advocated by Michael Corrado. Both of these theories are grounded on the presumption that persons lack desert-grounding free will. It is argued that on this presumption there is no reason to believe that Michael Corrado’s corrections model is any better than the quarantine model.","PeriodicalId":507415,"journal":{"name":"Diametros","volume":" March","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Free Will Skepticism, Quarantine, and Corrections\",\"authors\":\"John Lemos\",\"doi\":\"10.33392/diam.1952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article compares the quarantine model of criminal justice advocated by Derk Pereboom and Gregg Caruso with the corrections model of criminal justice advocated by Michael Corrado. Both of these theories are grounded on the presumption that persons lack desert-grounding free will. It is argued that on this presumption there is no reason to believe that Michael Corrado’s corrections model is any better than the quarantine model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diametros\",\"volume\":\" March\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diametros\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diametros","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了德克-佩雷布姆（Derk Pereboom）和格雷格-卡鲁索（Gregg Caruso）主张的刑事司法隔离模式与迈克尔-克拉多（Michael Corrado）主张的刑事司法惩戒模式。这两种理论的基础都是假设人缺乏基于沙漠的自由意志。他们认为，根据这一假设，没有理由认为迈克尔-克拉多的惩戒模式比隔离模式更好。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Free Will Skepticism, Quarantine, and Corrections

This article compares the quarantine model of criminal justice advocated by Derk Pereboom and Gregg Caruso with the corrections model of criminal justice advocated by Michael Corrado. Both of these theories are grounded on the presumption that persons lack desert-grounding free will. It is argued that on this presumption there is no reason to believe that Michael Corrado’s corrections model is any better than the quarantine model.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Diametros

自引率

0.00%

发文量