Francesca Tiso, K. Hebeda, Saskia M C Langemeijer, A. D. de Graaf, Joost H A Martens, Thessa N. Koorenhof-Scheele, Ruth Knops, L. Kroeze, B. A. van der Reijden, J. Jansen
{"title":"地西他滨治疗后急性髓细胞白血病患者骨髓活检中的红细胞优势与突变情况和完全缓解相关。","authors":"Francesca Tiso, K. Hebeda, Saskia M C Langemeijer, A. D. de Graaf, Joost H A Martens, Thessa N. Koorenhof-Scheele, Ruth Knops, L. Kroeze, B. A. van der Reijden, J. Jansen","doi":"10.1159/000538953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients may receive hypomethylating agents (HMAs) such as decitabine (DAC) as part of their treatment. Not all patients respond to this therapy, and if they do the clinical response may occur only after 3 to 6 courses of treatment. Hence, early biomarkers predicting response would be very useful.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 22 AML patients who were treated with DAC. Histology of the bone marrow biopsy, pathogenic mutations and methylation status were related to the treatment response.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn 8/22 (36%) patients, an erythroid dominant response (EDR) pattern, defined as a ratio of myeloid cells/erythroid cells < 1, was observed. In the remaining 14 cases a myeloid predominance was preserved during treatment. No difference in the hypomethylating effect of DAC treatment was observed in patients with and without EDR, as global 5-methylcytosine levels dropped similarly in both groups. Mutational analysis by NGS using a panel of commonly mutated genes in AML, showed that patients with an early EDR harbored on average less mutations, with U2AF1 mutations occurring more frequently, whereas RUNX1 mutations were underrepresented compared to non-EDR cases. Interestingly, the development of an EDR correlated with complete remission (7/8 cases with an EDR versus only 2/14 cases without an EDR).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nWe conclude that early histological bone marrow examination for the development of an EDR may be helpful to predict response in AML patients during treatment with DAC.","PeriodicalId":244631,"journal":{"name":"Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology","volume":"11 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erythroid predominance in bone marrow biopsies of AML patients after decitabine treatment correlates with mutation profile and complete remission.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Tiso, K. Hebeda, Saskia M C Langemeijer, A. D. de Graaf, Joost H A Martens, Thessa N. Koorenhof-Scheele, Ruth Knops, L. Kroeze, B. A. van der Reijden, J. Jansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients may receive hypomethylating agents (HMAs) such as decitabine (DAC) as part of their treatment. Not all patients respond to this therapy, and if they do the clinical response may occur only after 3 to 6 courses of treatment. Hence, early biomarkers predicting response would be very useful.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nWe retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 22 AML patients who were treated with DAC. Histology of the bone marrow biopsy, pathogenic mutations and methylation status were related to the treatment response.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nIn 8/22 (36%) patients, an erythroid dominant response (EDR) pattern, defined as a ratio of myeloid cells/erythroid cells < 1, was observed. In the remaining 14 cases a myeloid predominance was preserved during treatment. No difference in the hypomethylating effect of DAC treatment was observed in patients with and without EDR, as global 5-methylcytosine levels dropped similarly in both groups. Mutational analysis by NGS using a panel of commonly mutated genes in AML, showed that patients with an early EDR harbored on average less mutations, with U2AF1 mutations occurring more frequently, whereas RUNX1 mutations were underrepresented compared to non-EDR cases. Interestingly, the development of an EDR correlated with complete remission (7/8 cases with an EDR versus only 2/14 cases without an EDR).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nWe conclude that early histological bone marrow examination for the development of an EDR may be helpful to predict response in AML patients during treatment with DAC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology\",\"volume\":\"11 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Erythroid predominance in bone marrow biopsies of AML patients after decitabine treatment correlates with mutation profile and complete remission.
INTRODUCTION
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients may receive hypomethylating agents (HMAs) such as decitabine (DAC) as part of their treatment. Not all patients respond to this therapy, and if they do the clinical response may occur only after 3 to 6 courses of treatment. Hence, early biomarkers predicting response would be very useful.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 22 AML patients who were treated with DAC. Histology of the bone marrow biopsy, pathogenic mutations and methylation status were related to the treatment response.
RESULTS
In 8/22 (36%) patients, an erythroid dominant response (EDR) pattern, defined as a ratio of myeloid cells/erythroid cells < 1, was observed. In the remaining 14 cases a myeloid predominance was preserved during treatment. No difference in the hypomethylating effect of DAC treatment was observed in patients with and without EDR, as global 5-methylcytosine levels dropped similarly in both groups. Mutational analysis by NGS using a panel of commonly mutated genes in AML, showed that patients with an early EDR harbored on average less mutations, with U2AF1 mutations occurring more frequently, whereas RUNX1 mutations were underrepresented compared to non-EDR cases. Interestingly, the development of an EDR correlated with complete remission (7/8 cases with an EDR versus only 2/14 cases without an EDR).
CONCLUSION
We conclude that early histological bone marrow examination for the development of an EDR may be helpful to predict response in AML patients during treatment with DAC.