强脉冲光疗法与强脉冲光和低强度光疗法联合治疗睑板腺功能障碍的效果比较

Balmukund Agarwal, Parmita Dutta, Sangeeta Kalita, Daisy Rani Das, Ankita Singh
{"title":"强脉冲光疗法与强脉冲光和低强度光疗法联合治疗睑板腺功能障碍的效果比较","authors":"Balmukund Agarwal, Parmita Dutta, Sangeeta Kalita, Daisy Rani Das, Ankita Singh","doi":"10.25259/lajo_4_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe objective of this study was to study the efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy and a combination of intense pulse light therapy and low-level light therapy (LLLT) in treating meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).\n\n\n\nIn this prospective and hospital-based interventional study, 32 patients were enrolled between April 2023 and January 2024 in the Department of Cornea, Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Guwahati. The clinical evaluation was done included the ocular surface disease index (OSDI-6) questionnaire score, tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test I, slit-lamp examination for lid evaluation to see signs of pitting, telangiectasia, meibomian gland expressibility, meibography (to see gland dropout assessment), and meibomian gland loss percentage (MGL%). The enrolled participants were randomly allocated to receive IPL and combination light therapy (IPL+LLLT) in a 1:1 ratio.\n\n\n\nSixty-two eyes of 31 patients were included in this study. In the IPL group, the level of dryness (LOD) improved in nine (56.25%) cases and remained the same in seven cases (73.75%). In the IPL+ LLLT group, the LOD improved in eight cases (53.3%) and remained the same in six (40%) cases. For the right eye (OD), the MGL% was 0.46 ± 0.08 at baseline, which decreased to 0.32 ± 0.07 at six months. For the left eye (OS), MGL% was 0.52 ± 0.09 at baseline, and at six months, it reduced to 0.34 ± 0.08. In OD, MGL% was 0.46 ± 0.06 at baseline, reduced to 0.35 ± 0.12 at six months. In OS, MGL% was 0.49 ± 0.09 at baseline, and at six months, it reduced to 0.35 ± 0.12. In the IPL group, the mean TBUT in OD improved from 3.25 to 5.25 in 1 month. The mean TBUT for OS improved from 4.19 to 6.44 in OS. In the IPL+LLLT group, the mean TBUT in OD improved from 3.2 to 5.2 at one month in OS. The mean TBUT in OS improved from 4.27 to 6 in one month.\n\n\n\nIPL alone or in combination with LLLT has similar efficacy in treating MGD. There was a reduction in the OSDI score LOD with improved TBUT and decreased MGL% at the end of 1, and six months.\n","PeriodicalId":437914,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"139 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of intense-pulsed light therapy versus combination of intense-pulsed light and low-level light therapy for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction\",\"authors\":\"Balmukund Agarwal, Parmita Dutta, Sangeeta Kalita, Daisy Rani Das, Ankita Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/lajo_4_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThe objective of this study was to study the efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy and a combination of intense pulse light therapy and low-level light therapy (LLLT) in treating meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).\\n\\n\\n\\nIn this prospective and hospital-based interventional study, 32 patients were enrolled between April 2023 and January 2024 in the Department of Cornea, Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Guwahati. The clinical evaluation was done included the ocular surface disease index (OSDI-6) questionnaire score, tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test I, slit-lamp examination for lid evaluation to see signs of pitting, telangiectasia, meibomian gland expressibility, meibography (to see gland dropout assessment), and meibomian gland loss percentage (MGL%). The enrolled participants were randomly allocated to receive IPL and combination light therapy (IPL+LLLT) in a 1:1 ratio.\\n\\n\\n\\nSixty-two eyes of 31 patients were included in this study. In the IPL group, the level of dryness (LOD) improved in nine (56.25%) cases and remained the same in seven cases (73.75%). In the IPL+ LLLT group, the LOD improved in eight cases (53.3%) and remained the same in six (40%) cases. For the right eye (OD), the MGL% was 0.46 ± 0.08 at baseline, which decreased to 0.32 ± 0.07 at six months. For the left eye (OS), MGL% was 0.52 ± 0.09 at baseline, and at six months, it reduced to 0.34 ± 0.08. In OD, MGL% was 0.46 ± 0.06 at baseline, reduced to 0.35 ± 0.12 at six months. In OS, MGL% was 0.49 ± 0.09 at baseline, and at six months, it reduced to 0.35 ± 0.12. In the IPL group, the mean TBUT in OD improved from 3.25 to 5.25 in 1 month. The mean TBUT for OS improved from 4.19 to 6.44 in OS. In the IPL+LLLT group, the mean TBUT in OD improved from 3.2 to 5.2 at one month in OS. The mean TBUT in OS improved from 4.27 to 6 in one month.\\n\\n\\n\\nIPL alone or in combination with LLLT has similar efficacy in treating MGD. There was a reduction in the OSDI score LOD with improved TBUT and decreased MGL% at the end of 1, and six months.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":437914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"139 47\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/lajo_4_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/lajo_4_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是研究强脉冲光(IPL)疗法以及强脉冲光疗法和低强度光疗法(LLLT)联合治疗睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)的疗效。在这项前瞻性医院干预研究中,32 名患者于 2023 年 4 月至 2024 年 1 月期间在古瓦哈提的 Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya 角膜科登记入院。临床评估包括眼表疾病指数(OSDI-6)问卷评分、泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、施尔默试验 I、裂隙灯检查眼睑评估,以观察凹陷迹象、毛细血管扩张、睑板腺表达能力、睑板腺造影(观察腺体脱落评估)和睑板腺脱落百分比(MGL%)。31名患者的62只眼睛被纳入这项研究。在 IPL 组中,9 例(56.25%)患者的干涩程度(LOD)有所改善,7 例(73.75%)保持不变。在 IPL+ LLLT 组中,8 个病例(53.3%)的干涩度(LOD)有所改善,6 个病例(40%)的干涩度(LOD)保持不变。右眼(OD)的 MGL% 基线值为 0.46 ± 0.08,六个月后降至 0.32 ± 0.07。左眼(OS)的 MGL% 基线值为 0.52 ± 0.09,六个月后降至 0.34 ± 0.08。左眼(OD)的MGL%基线值为0.46 ± 0.06,六个月后降至0.35 ± 0.12。在 OS 组,MGL% 的基线值为 0.49 ± 0.09,6 个月后降至 0.35 ± 0.12。在 IPL 组中,OD 的平均 TBUT 在 1 个月内从 3.25 提高到 5.25。OS 的平均 TBUT 从 4.19 提高到 6.44。在 IPL+LLLT 组中,OD 的平均 TBUT 在 1 个月后从 3.2 提高到 5.2。单用 IPL 或与 LLLT 联用治疗 MGD 的疗效相似。在 1 个月和 6 个月结束时,OSDI 评分 LOD 有所下降,TBUT 有所改善,MGL% 有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of intense-pulsed light therapy versus combination of intense-pulsed light and low-level light therapy for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction
The objective of this study was to study the efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy and a combination of intense pulse light therapy and low-level light therapy (LLLT) in treating meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). In this prospective and hospital-based interventional study, 32 patients were enrolled between April 2023 and January 2024 in the Department of Cornea, Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Guwahati. The clinical evaluation was done included the ocular surface disease index (OSDI-6) questionnaire score, tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test I, slit-lamp examination for lid evaluation to see signs of pitting, telangiectasia, meibomian gland expressibility, meibography (to see gland dropout assessment), and meibomian gland loss percentage (MGL%). The enrolled participants were randomly allocated to receive IPL and combination light therapy (IPL+LLLT) in a 1:1 ratio. Sixty-two eyes of 31 patients were included in this study. In the IPL group, the level of dryness (LOD) improved in nine (56.25%) cases and remained the same in seven cases (73.75%). In the IPL+ LLLT group, the LOD improved in eight cases (53.3%) and remained the same in six (40%) cases. For the right eye (OD), the MGL% was 0.46 ± 0.08 at baseline, which decreased to 0.32 ± 0.07 at six months. For the left eye (OS), MGL% was 0.52 ± 0.09 at baseline, and at six months, it reduced to 0.34 ± 0.08. In OD, MGL% was 0.46 ± 0.06 at baseline, reduced to 0.35 ± 0.12 at six months. In OS, MGL% was 0.49 ± 0.09 at baseline, and at six months, it reduced to 0.35 ± 0.12. In the IPL group, the mean TBUT in OD improved from 3.25 to 5.25 in 1 month. The mean TBUT for OS improved from 4.19 to 6.44 in OS. In the IPL+LLLT group, the mean TBUT in OD improved from 3.2 to 5.2 at one month in OS. The mean TBUT in OS improved from 4.27 to 6 in one month. IPL alone or in combination with LLLT has similar efficacy in treating MGD. There was a reduction in the OSDI score LOD with improved TBUT and decreased MGL% at the end of 1, and six months.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信