乔伊斯小说《尤利西斯》中对神话原型 "儿子 "和 "父亲 "的改造

N. A. Karlik
{"title":"乔伊斯小说《尤利西斯》中对神话原型 \"儿子 \"和 \"父亲 \"的改造","authors":"N. A. Karlik","doi":"10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-2-117-130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" Introduction. This article delves into the analysis of modifications of mythological and   Christian archetypes in Joyce's work, particularly focusing on the novel “Ulysses” and   examining characters playing familial roles of “son” and “father”. The interest in family ties   is explored considering the atmosphere of creating the novel and biographical aspects.   Family roles are viewed through the modifications of a significant biblical narrative for the   author – the story of the prodigal son. The goal of the analysis was to showcase which vector   the author chose and why to develop this archetypal theme in “Ulysses”. The main role,   adapted to the familial setting through a new interpretation of the parable, was identified   and analyzed as the role of the “prodigal father”.   Methodology and sources. The textual analysis in the article was conducted in the   traditions of post-structuralism: additional intertexts were used to augment the familial   relationships of the novel's characters with new meanings.  Results and discussion. Through the modernization of familial archetypes in the novel, this   article demonstrates how Joyce, as a representative of world literature, treated these   templates. His myth-making involved selectively drawing from source materials that suited   his specific purposes, whether it was the story of Odysseus or the parable of the prodigal   son. He approached the archetypal text liberally, using it as a systematizing mechanism to   elevate contemporary issues to a more universal level.   Conclusion. The article sequentially examines canonical archetypal roles and various   possible readings of the source text, influenced by the author's personal experiences   (biographical) as well as the cultural-historical context, shifting peripheral components of   the parable to dominant positions. ","PeriodicalId":505315,"journal":{"name":"Discourse","volume":"12 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Modification of Mythological Archetypes “son” and “father” in Joyce's Novel “Ulysses”\",\"authors\":\"N. A. Karlik\",\"doi\":\"10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-2-117-130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" Introduction. This article delves into the analysis of modifications of mythological and   Christian archetypes in Joyce's work, particularly focusing on the novel “Ulysses” and   examining characters playing familial roles of “son” and “father”. The interest in family ties   is explored considering the atmosphere of creating the novel and biographical aspects.   Family roles are viewed through the modifications of a significant biblical narrative for the   author – the story of the prodigal son. The goal of the analysis was to showcase which vector   the author chose and why to develop this archetypal theme in “Ulysses”. The main role,   adapted to the familial setting through a new interpretation of the parable, was identified   and analyzed as the role of the “prodigal father”.   Methodology and sources. The textual analysis in the article was conducted in the   traditions of post-structuralism: additional intertexts were used to augment the familial   relationships of the novel's characters with new meanings.  Results and discussion. Through the modernization of familial archetypes in the novel, this   article demonstrates how Joyce, as a representative of world literature, treated these   templates. His myth-making involved selectively drawing from source materials that suited   his specific purposes, whether it was the story of Odysseus or the parable of the prodigal   son. He approached the archetypal text liberally, using it as a systematizing mechanism to   elevate contemporary issues to a more universal level.   Conclusion. The article sequentially examines canonical archetypal roles and various   possible readings of the source text, influenced by the author's personal experiences   (biographical) as well as the cultural-historical context, shifting peripheral components of   the parable to dominant positions. \",\"PeriodicalId\":505315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourse\",\"volume\":\"12 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-2-117-130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-2-117-130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言本文深入分析了乔伊斯作品中对神话和基督教原型的修改,尤其侧重于小说《尤利西斯》,并研究了扮演 "儿子 "和 "父亲 "等家庭角色的人物。考虑到小说的创作氛围和传记内容,探讨了对家庭关系的兴趣。 通过对作者的一个重要圣经叙事--浪子的故事--的修改来审视家庭角色。分析的目的是展示作者在《尤利西斯》中选择了哪种载体以及为什么要发展这一原型主题。通过对寓言的新诠释,作者确定并分析了 "浪子父亲 "在家庭环境中的主要角色。 方法和资料来源。文章中的文本分析是按照后结构主义的传统进行的:使用了额外的互文,为小说人物的家庭关系增添了新的含义。 结果与讨论。本文通过对小说中家庭原型的现代化研究,展示了作为世界文学代表的乔伊斯是如何处理这些模板的。无论是奥德修斯的故事还是浪子的寓言,他的神话创作都是有选择性地汲取适合其特定目的的素材。他随意使用原型文本,将其作为一种系统化机制,将当代问题提升到更具普遍性的高度。 结论。受作者个人经历(传记)和文化历史背景的影响,文章依次研究了原型的经典角色和对源文本的各种可能解读,将寓言的边缘部分转移到了主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Modification of Mythological Archetypes “son” and “father” in Joyce's Novel “Ulysses”
 Introduction. This article delves into the analysis of modifications of mythological and   Christian archetypes in Joyce's work, particularly focusing on the novel “Ulysses” and   examining characters playing familial roles of “son” and “father”. The interest in family ties   is explored considering the atmosphere of creating the novel and biographical aspects.   Family roles are viewed through the modifications of a significant biblical narrative for the   author – the story of the prodigal son. The goal of the analysis was to showcase which vector   the author chose and why to develop this archetypal theme in “Ulysses”. The main role,   adapted to the familial setting through a new interpretation of the parable, was identified   and analyzed as the role of the “prodigal father”.   Methodology and sources. The textual analysis in the article was conducted in the   traditions of post-structuralism: additional intertexts were used to augment the familial   relationships of the novel's characters with new meanings.  Results and discussion. Through the modernization of familial archetypes in the novel, this   article demonstrates how Joyce, as a representative of world literature, treated these   templates. His myth-making involved selectively drawing from source materials that suited   his specific purposes, whether it was the story of Odysseus or the parable of the prodigal   son. He approached the archetypal text liberally, using it as a systematizing mechanism to   elevate contemporary issues to a more universal level.   Conclusion. The article sequentially examines canonical archetypal roles and various   possible readings of the source text, influenced by the author's personal experiences   (biographical) as well as the cultural-historical context, shifting peripheral components of   the parable to dominant positions. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信