工程专业学生数学建模的元认知策略:问卷的调整与验证

Noemí Cárcamo Mansilla, María Aravena Díaz
{"title":"工程专业学生数学建模的元认知策略:问卷的调整与验证","authors":"Noemí Cárcamo Mansilla, María Aravena Díaz","doi":"10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-1-41-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A sequential exploratory mixed-methods study is implemented to develop an instrument that allows for the evaluation of the metacognitive strategies used by engineering groups of students when solving mathematical modeling problems. The findings of the qualitative study guided by observations and interviews reveal the use of metacognitive strategies of ‘planning’, ‘monitoring and, if necessary, regulation’, and ‘evaluation’. In this article, we present the final categories of the qualitative analysis and discuss how these data were shaped into a theoretical construct and items of an instrument to measure metacognitive strategies. The psychometric properties of the instrument are analyzed, and it is argued that it has a similar interpretation among males and females, as there are no significant differences in these results. The development of the present study demonstrates how the qualitative method can support the adaptation of an instrument to measure metacognitive strategies, thus contributing to validity and applicability.","PeriodicalId":507180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE)","volume":"64 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metacognitive Strategies for Mathematical Modeling with Engineering Groups of Students: Adaptation and Validation of a Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Noemí Cárcamo Mansilla, María Aravena Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-1-41-55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A sequential exploratory mixed-methods study is implemented to develop an instrument that allows for the evaluation of the metacognitive strategies used by engineering groups of students when solving mathematical modeling problems. The findings of the qualitative study guided by observations and interviews reveal the use of metacognitive strategies of ‘planning’, ‘monitoring and, if necessary, regulation’, and ‘evaluation’. In this article, we present the final categories of the qualitative analysis and discuss how these data were shaped into a theoretical construct and items of an instrument to measure metacognitive strategies. The psychometric properties of the instrument are analyzed, and it is argued that it has a similar interpretation among males and females, as there are no significant differences in these results. The development of the present study demonstrates how the qualitative method can support the adaptation of an instrument to measure metacognitive strategies, thus contributing to validity and applicability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE)\",\"volume\":\"64 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-1-41-55\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-1-41-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了开发一种工具来评估工程学小组的学生在解决数学建模问题时使用的元认知策略,我们开展了一项循序渐进的探索性混合方法研究。通过观察和访谈得出的定性研究结果显示,学生使用了 "计划"、"监控和必要的调节 "以及 "评价 "等元认知策略。在本文中,我们将介绍定性分析的最终分类,并讨论如何将这些数据转化为理论构架和元认知策略测量工具的项目。我们分析了该工具的心理测量特性,并认为该工具在男性和女性中具有相似的解释,因为这些结果没有显著差异。本研究的开展表明,定性方法可以支持对元认知策略测量工具的调整,从而促进其有效性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metacognitive Strategies for Mathematical Modeling with Engineering Groups of Students: Adaptation and Validation of a Questionnaire
A sequential exploratory mixed-methods study is implemented to develop an instrument that allows for the evaluation of the metacognitive strategies used by engineering groups of students when solving mathematical modeling problems. The findings of the qualitative study guided by observations and interviews reveal the use of metacognitive strategies of ‘planning’, ‘monitoring and, if necessary, regulation’, and ‘evaluation’. In this article, we present the final categories of the qualitative analysis and discuss how these data were shaped into a theoretical construct and items of an instrument to measure metacognitive strategies. The psychometric properties of the instrument are analyzed, and it is argued that it has a similar interpretation among males and females, as there are no significant differences in these results. The development of the present study demonstrates how the qualitative method can support the adaptation of an instrument to measure metacognitive strategies, thus contributing to validity and applicability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信