有关强制接种 COVID-19 疫苗的法律问题:尼日利亚案例研究

P. Aidonojie, Esther Chetachukwu Aidonojie, Tom Mulegi, Obieshi Eregbuonye
{"title":"有关强制接种 COVID-19 疫苗的法律问题:尼日利亚案例研究","authors":"P. Aidonojie, Esther Chetachukwu Aidonojie, Tom Mulegi, Obieshi Eregbuonye","doi":"10.52970/grlspr.v3i2.349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is no news that COVID-19 has rendered severe havoc in the global environment. Although, various medical scientists and scholars were able to find a possible curtailment (Through vaccination) of the deadly COVID-19, however, there seems to be fear of the negative medical outcome of being vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine, given several claims of the potential danger. Furthermore, it suffices to state that Nigeria has also had its fair share of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this regard, to curtail the spread of COVID-19 in Nigeria, the Nigerian government sorts to make vaccination compulsory, despite the legal and medical rights of its citizens as enshrined in the constitution and judicial precedent. It is in this regard, that this study sort to adopt a hybrid method of study concerning the legal issues of compulsory vaccination in Nigeria. Concerning this, 310 questionnaires were sent to respondents residing in Nigeria. The study therefore found that there were incidences of COVID-19 in Nigeria and there are laws concerning the control of infectious disease in Nigeria. However, the study further found that it is a legal misnomer to compel an individual forcefully against his/her wishes to be vaccinated. Therefore, the study concludes and recommends that for effective vaccination against COVID-19, the Nigerian government needs to avoid forceful vaccination, but rather a wide sensitization concerning the vaccine's potency as against the negative claim concerning the COVID-19 vaccine. ","PeriodicalId":356270,"journal":{"name":"Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review","volume":"47 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Issues Concerning Compulsory COVID-19 Vaccination: Nigeria as a Case Study\",\"authors\":\"P. Aidonojie, Esther Chetachukwu Aidonojie, Tom Mulegi, Obieshi Eregbuonye\",\"doi\":\"10.52970/grlspr.v3i2.349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is no news that COVID-19 has rendered severe havoc in the global environment. Although, various medical scientists and scholars were able to find a possible curtailment (Through vaccination) of the deadly COVID-19, however, there seems to be fear of the negative medical outcome of being vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine, given several claims of the potential danger. Furthermore, it suffices to state that Nigeria has also had its fair share of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this regard, to curtail the spread of COVID-19 in Nigeria, the Nigerian government sorts to make vaccination compulsory, despite the legal and medical rights of its citizens as enshrined in the constitution and judicial precedent. It is in this regard, that this study sort to adopt a hybrid method of study concerning the legal issues of compulsory vaccination in Nigeria. Concerning this, 310 questionnaires were sent to respondents residing in Nigeria. The study therefore found that there were incidences of COVID-19 in Nigeria and there are laws concerning the control of infectious disease in Nigeria. However, the study further found that it is a legal misnomer to compel an individual forcefully against his/her wishes to be vaccinated. Therefore, the study concludes and recommends that for effective vaccination against COVID-19, the Nigerian government needs to avoid forceful vaccination, but rather a wide sensitization concerning the vaccine's potency as against the negative claim concerning the COVID-19 vaccine. \",\"PeriodicalId\":356270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"47 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v3i2.349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v3i2.349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 在全球环境中造成了严重破坏,这已经不是什么新闻了。尽管不同的医学家和学者能够找到一种可能的方法(通过接种疫苗)来遏制致命的 COVID-19,但是,鉴于一些人声称接种 COVID-19 疫苗具有潜在危险,人们似乎担心接种疫苗会带来负面的医疗结果。此外,只需指出尼日利亚也曾经历过 COVID-19 的大流行。在这方面,为了遏制 COVID-19 在尼日利亚的传播,尼日利亚政府不顾宪法和司法先例赋予公民的法律和医疗权利,强行要求接种疫苗。因此,本研究采用混合研究方法,探讨尼日利亚强制疫苗接种的法律问题。为此,本研究向居住在尼日利亚的受访者发放了 310 份调查问卷。因此,研究发现,尼日利亚有 COVID-19 的发病率,并且有关于控制传染病的法律。然而,研究进一步发现,违背个人意愿强行强迫其接种疫苗是一种法律错误。因此,研究得出结论并建议,为了有效接种 COVID-19 疫苗,尼日利亚政府需要避免强制接种,而是要广泛宣传疫苗的效力,反对有关 COVID-19 疫苗的负面说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Issues Concerning Compulsory COVID-19 Vaccination: Nigeria as a Case Study
It is no news that COVID-19 has rendered severe havoc in the global environment. Although, various medical scientists and scholars were able to find a possible curtailment (Through vaccination) of the deadly COVID-19, however, there seems to be fear of the negative medical outcome of being vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine, given several claims of the potential danger. Furthermore, it suffices to state that Nigeria has also had its fair share of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this regard, to curtail the spread of COVID-19 in Nigeria, the Nigerian government sorts to make vaccination compulsory, despite the legal and medical rights of its citizens as enshrined in the constitution and judicial precedent. It is in this regard, that this study sort to adopt a hybrid method of study concerning the legal issues of compulsory vaccination in Nigeria. Concerning this, 310 questionnaires were sent to respondents residing in Nigeria. The study therefore found that there were incidences of COVID-19 in Nigeria and there are laws concerning the control of infectious disease in Nigeria. However, the study further found that it is a legal misnomer to compel an individual forcefully against his/her wishes to be vaccinated. Therefore, the study concludes and recommends that for effective vaccination against COVID-19, the Nigerian government needs to avoid forceful vaccination, but rather a wide sensitization concerning the vaccine's potency as against the negative claim concerning the COVID-19 vaccine. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信