利用从露头获得的三维模型和合成地震数据对深水道地震剖面的无监督机器学习方法进行不确定性评估

Karelia La Marca, H. Bedle, L. Stright, Kurt Marfurt
{"title":"利用从露头获得的三维模型和合成地震数据对深水道地震剖面的无监督机器学习方法进行不确定性评估","authors":"Karelia La Marca, H. Bedle, L. Stright, Kurt Marfurt","doi":"10.1190/int-2023-0094.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unsupervised machine learning (ML) techniques have been widely applied to analyze seismic reflection data, including the identification of seismic facies and structural features. However, interpreting the resulting clusters often relies on geoscientists’ expertise, necessitating a robustness assessment of these methods. To evaluate their reliability, synthetic data generated from an actual outcrop model were employed to demonstrate how two unsupervised methods, Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) and Generative Topographic Maps (GTM), cluster deepwater channel-related seismic facies and then measure the associated error. Six seismic attributes, comprising RMS amplitude, instantaneous envelope, peak magnitude, and spectral decomposition frequencies at 20, 40, and 55 Hz, served as input variables. Geobodies were assigned to each cluster formed, and error in facies clustering was quantified by comparing the actual 3D model with the facies grouped by machine learning methods on a voxel-by-voxel basis. This allowed for error quantification and the computation of metrics such as F1 score and accuracy through correlation matrices. Key findings revealed that (1) GTM and SOM exhibited similar performance, with a clustering configuration of 81 for GTM slightly outperforming others. (2) Error rates were approximately 2% for the predominant facies (background shale) but significantly higher for individual channel-related facies, suggesting that channel clusters might represent multiple facies. (3) Resolution and imbalanced data distribution impacted seismic facies predictability, resulting in nonuniqueness in cluster generation. (4) Using synthetic seismic data proved valuable for experimenting with different unsupervised ML, highlighting the need for assessing uncertainty in these methods, given their implications for crucial economic decisions reliant on reservoir interpretation, modeling, and volumetric estimations.","PeriodicalId":502519,"journal":{"name":"Interpretation","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UNCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT IN UNSUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR DEEPWATER CHANNEL SEISMIC FACIES USING OUTCROP-DERIVED 3D MODELS AND SYNTHETIC SEISMIC DATA\",\"authors\":\"Karelia La Marca, H. Bedle, L. Stright, Kurt Marfurt\",\"doi\":\"10.1190/int-2023-0094.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unsupervised machine learning (ML) techniques have been widely applied to analyze seismic reflection data, including the identification of seismic facies and structural features. However, interpreting the resulting clusters often relies on geoscientists’ expertise, necessitating a robustness assessment of these methods. To evaluate their reliability, synthetic data generated from an actual outcrop model were employed to demonstrate how two unsupervised methods, Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) and Generative Topographic Maps (GTM), cluster deepwater channel-related seismic facies and then measure the associated error. Six seismic attributes, comprising RMS amplitude, instantaneous envelope, peak magnitude, and spectral decomposition frequencies at 20, 40, and 55 Hz, served as input variables. Geobodies were assigned to each cluster formed, and error in facies clustering was quantified by comparing the actual 3D model with the facies grouped by machine learning methods on a voxel-by-voxel basis. This allowed for error quantification and the computation of metrics such as F1 score and accuracy through correlation matrices. Key findings revealed that (1) GTM and SOM exhibited similar performance, with a clustering configuration of 81 for GTM slightly outperforming others. (2) Error rates were approximately 2% for the predominant facies (background shale) but significantly higher for individual channel-related facies, suggesting that channel clusters might represent multiple facies. (3) Resolution and imbalanced data distribution impacted seismic facies predictability, resulting in nonuniqueness in cluster generation. (4) Using synthetic seismic data proved valuable for experimenting with different unsupervised ML, highlighting the need for assessing uncertainty in these methods, given their implications for crucial economic decisions reliant on reservoir interpretation, modeling, and volumetric estimations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interpretation\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interpretation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2023-0094.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2023-0094.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无监督机器学习(ML)技术已被广泛应用于分析地震反射数据,包括识别地震面和结构特征。然而,解释由此产生的群集往往依赖于地球科学家的专业知识,因此有必要对这些方法进行稳健性评估。为了评估这些方法的可靠性,我们采用了由实际露头模型生成的合成数据,来演示自组织图(SOM)和生成地形图(GTM)这两种无监督方法如何聚类深水道相关地震面,然后测量相关误差。输入变量包括有效值振幅、瞬时包络、峰值振幅以及 20、40 和 55 Hz 的频谱分解频率等六个地震属性。为形成的每个群组分配地质体,并通过比较实际三维模型和机器学习方法按象素逐一分组的面,量化面分组的误差。这样就可以量化误差,并通过相关矩阵计算 F1 分数和准确度等指标。主要研究结果表明:(1) GTM 和 SOM 表现出相似的性能,GTM 的聚类配置为 81,略优于其他聚类配置。(2) 主要岩层(背景页岩)的错误率约为 2%,但与通道相关的个别岩层的错误率明显更高,这表明通道群可能代表多个岩层。(3) 分辨率和不平衡的数据分布影响了地震剖面的可预测性,导致群集生成的非唯一性。(4) 使用合成地震数据对试验不同的无监督 ML 很有价值,强调了评估这些方法不确定性的必要性,因为它们对依赖于储层解释、建模和体积估算的重要经济决策具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
UNCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT IN UNSUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR DEEPWATER CHANNEL SEISMIC FACIES USING OUTCROP-DERIVED 3D MODELS AND SYNTHETIC SEISMIC DATA
Unsupervised machine learning (ML) techniques have been widely applied to analyze seismic reflection data, including the identification of seismic facies and structural features. However, interpreting the resulting clusters often relies on geoscientists’ expertise, necessitating a robustness assessment of these methods. To evaluate their reliability, synthetic data generated from an actual outcrop model were employed to demonstrate how two unsupervised methods, Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) and Generative Topographic Maps (GTM), cluster deepwater channel-related seismic facies and then measure the associated error. Six seismic attributes, comprising RMS amplitude, instantaneous envelope, peak magnitude, and spectral decomposition frequencies at 20, 40, and 55 Hz, served as input variables. Geobodies were assigned to each cluster formed, and error in facies clustering was quantified by comparing the actual 3D model with the facies grouped by machine learning methods on a voxel-by-voxel basis. This allowed for error quantification and the computation of metrics such as F1 score and accuracy through correlation matrices. Key findings revealed that (1) GTM and SOM exhibited similar performance, with a clustering configuration of 81 for GTM slightly outperforming others. (2) Error rates were approximately 2% for the predominant facies (background shale) but significantly higher for individual channel-related facies, suggesting that channel clusters might represent multiple facies. (3) Resolution and imbalanced data distribution impacted seismic facies predictability, resulting in nonuniqueness in cluster generation. (4) Using synthetic seismic data proved valuable for experimenting with different unsupervised ML, highlighting the need for assessing uncertainty in these methods, given their implications for crucial economic decisions reliant on reservoir interpretation, modeling, and volumetric estimations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信