制定养老院跌倒管理原则:专家共识过程

Q2 Health Professions
Katie R. Robinson, Frances Hallam, Jane C. Horne, Fran Allen, J. Darby, Alice Kilby, Stephen Timmons, Adam Gordon, Pip A Logan
{"title":"制定养老院跌倒管理原则:专家共识过程","authors":"Katie R. Robinson, Frances Hallam, Jane C. Horne, Fran Allen, J. Darby, Alice Kilby, Stephen Timmons, Adam Gordon, Pip A Logan","doi":"10.31389/jltc.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Managing falls in care homes requires an individualised approach for each resident with involvement of staff from care homes and the wider health and social care system. A large randomised controlled trial evaluating an individualised falls management programme (Action FALLS) demonstrated positive findings. However, the delivery of the key components of such programmes is still unclear. Greater understanding of the core components of falls management programmes is needed to support future implementation research.\nObjective: To establish expert consensus on the core components of falls management for older care home residents.\nMethods: A modified Nominal Group Technique included the development of a draft set of principles through a scoping review of the grey literature (published elsewhere) and a one-off online nominal group with care home staff and clinicians. Following the group, a single online survey was circulated to gain agreement on the final principles.\nFindings: 10 participants (including healthcare professionals, care home managers, and care home staff) took part in the online nominal group. Thirty-five core principles of falls management were developed within the domains of theoretical approach, assessments, interventions, training, time points, wider systems, and governance and reporting.\nLimitations: Since a small number of experts took part in this consensus process from a large and diverse care home sector, it is important to consider the principles as providing support for future implementation work.\nImplications: These core principles provide a foundation to guide care homes in managing falls in care home residents. Further research is needed to develop implementation strategies and test the feasibility of embedding the principles in routine practice.","PeriodicalId":73807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing the Principles of Falls Management in Care Homes: An expert Consensus Process\",\"authors\":\"Katie R. Robinson, Frances Hallam, Jane C. Horne, Fran Allen, J. Darby, Alice Kilby, Stephen Timmons, Adam Gordon, Pip A Logan\",\"doi\":\"10.31389/jltc.170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Managing falls in care homes requires an individualised approach for each resident with involvement of staff from care homes and the wider health and social care system. A large randomised controlled trial evaluating an individualised falls management programme (Action FALLS) demonstrated positive findings. However, the delivery of the key components of such programmes is still unclear. Greater understanding of the core components of falls management programmes is needed to support future implementation research.\\nObjective: To establish expert consensus on the core components of falls management for older care home residents.\\nMethods: A modified Nominal Group Technique included the development of a draft set of principles through a scoping review of the grey literature (published elsewhere) and a one-off online nominal group with care home staff and clinicians. Following the group, a single online survey was circulated to gain agreement on the final principles.\\nFindings: 10 participants (including healthcare professionals, care home managers, and care home staff) took part in the online nominal group. Thirty-five core principles of falls management were developed within the domains of theoretical approach, assessments, interventions, training, time points, wider systems, and governance and reporting.\\nLimitations: Since a small number of experts took part in this consensus process from a large and diverse care home sector, it is important to consider the principles as providing support for future implementation work.\\nImplications: These core principles provide a foundation to guide care homes in managing falls in care home residents. Further research is needed to develop implementation strategies and test the feasibility of embedding the principles in routine practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of long-term care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of long-term care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:要管理好护理院中的跌倒问题,就必须在护理院工作人员以及更广泛的医疗和社会护理系统的参与下,针对每位居民采取个性化的方法。一项大型随机对照试验对个性化跌倒管理计划(Action FALLS)进行了评估,并取得了积极的成果。然而,此类计划的关键组成部分的实施仍不明确。需要进一步了解跌倒管理计划的核心内容,以支持未来的实施研究:就老年护理院居民跌倒管理的核心内容达成专家共识:方法:采用修改后的名义小组技术,包括通过对灰色文献(发表于其他地方)进行范围界定,制定一套原则草案,并与护理院员工和临床医生进行一次性在线名义小组讨论。小组讨论结束后,分发了一份单一的在线调查,以就最终原则达成一致意见:10 名参与者(包括医护人员、护理院经理和护理院员工)参加了在线名义小组。在理论方法、评估、干预、培训、时间点、更广泛的系统以及管理和报告等领域,制定了 35 项跌倒管理核心原则:局限性:由于参与此次共识进程的专家人数较少,且来自规模庞大、种类繁多的护理院领域,因此必须将这些原则视为对未来实施工作的支持:这些核心原则为指导护理院管理护理院居民跌倒问题奠定了基础。需要开展进一步研究,以制定实施策略,并测试将这些原则纳入日常实践的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing the Principles of Falls Management in Care Homes: An expert Consensus Process
Context: Managing falls in care homes requires an individualised approach for each resident with involvement of staff from care homes and the wider health and social care system. A large randomised controlled trial evaluating an individualised falls management programme (Action FALLS) demonstrated positive findings. However, the delivery of the key components of such programmes is still unclear. Greater understanding of the core components of falls management programmes is needed to support future implementation research. Objective: To establish expert consensus on the core components of falls management for older care home residents. Methods: A modified Nominal Group Technique included the development of a draft set of principles through a scoping review of the grey literature (published elsewhere) and a one-off online nominal group with care home staff and clinicians. Following the group, a single online survey was circulated to gain agreement on the final principles. Findings: 10 participants (including healthcare professionals, care home managers, and care home staff) took part in the online nominal group. Thirty-five core principles of falls management were developed within the domains of theoretical approach, assessments, interventions, training, time points, wider systems, and governance and reporting. Limitations: Since a small number of experts took part in this consensus process from a large and diverse care home sector, it is important to consider the principles as providing support for future implementation work. Implications: These core principles provide a foundation to guide care homes in managing falls in care home residents. Further research is needed to develop implementation strategies and test the feasibility of embedding the principles in routine practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
33 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信