认知性和情感性工作不安全感的测量不变性:跨国研究

Gina Görgens-Ekermans, V. Ghezzi, T. Probst, Claudio Barbaranelli, Laura Petitta, Lixin Jiang, Sanman Hu
{"title":"认知性和情感性工作不安全感的测量不变性:跨国研究","authors":"Gina Görgens-Ekermans, V. Ghezzi, T. Probst, Claudio Barbaranelli, Laura Petitta, Lixin Jiang, Sanman Hu","doi":"10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical evidence of established measurement invariance of job insecurity measures may enhance the practical utility of job insecurity as a valid predictor when utilised over different cross-national samples. This study investigated the measurement invariance of the nine-item versions of the Job Security Index (a measure of cognitive job insecurity) and the Job Security Satisfaction Scale (a measure of affective job insecurity), across four countries (i.e. the United States, N = 486; China, N = 629; Italy, N = 482 and South Africa, N = 345). Based on a novel bifactor-(S-1) model approach we found evidence for partial metric, partial scalar and partial strict invariance of our substantive bifactor-(S-1) structure. The results extend measurement invariance research on job insecurity with obvious pragmatic implications (e.g. scaling units, measurement bias over cross-national interpretations).Contribution: This research provides evidence to support the applied use of cross-national comparisons of job insecurity scores across the nationalities included in this study. Theoretically, this research advances the debate about the nature of the relationship between cognitive and affective job insecurity, suggesting that in this cross-national dataset, a model where cognitive job insecurity is specified as the reference domain outperforms a model where affective job insecurity is assigned this status. Practically, it demonstrates that it is sensible and necessary to differentiate between cognitive and affective job insecurity and include measures of both constructs in future research on the construct.","PeriodicalId":34043,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement invariance of cognitive and affective job insecurity: A cross-national study\",\"authors\":\"Gina Görgens-Ekermans, V. Ghezzi, T. Probst, Claudio Barbaranelli, Laura Petitta, Lixin Jiang, Sanman Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empirical evidence of established measurement invariance of job insecurity measures may enhance the practical utility of job insecurity as a valid predictor when utilised over different cross-national samples. This study investigated the measurement invariance of the nine-item versions of the Job Security Index (a measure of cognitive job insecurity) and the Job Security Satisfaction Scale (a measure of affective job insecurity), across four countries (i.e. the United States, N = 486; China, N = 629; Italy, N = 482 and South Africa, N = 345). Based on a novel bifactor-(S-1) model approach we found evidence for partial metric, partial scalar and partial strict invariance of our substantive bifactor-(S-1) structure. The results extend measurement invariance research on job insecurity with obvious pragmatic implications (e.g. scaling units, measurement bias over cross-national interpretations).Contribution: This research provides evidence to support the applied use of cross-national comparisons of job insecurity scores across the nationalities included in this study. Theoretically, this research advances the debate about the nature of the relationship between cognitive and affective job insecurity, suggesting that in this cross-national dataset, a model where cognitive job insecurity is specified as the reference domain outperforms a model where affective job insecurity is assigned this status. Practically, it demonstrates that it is sensible and necessary to differentiate between cognitive and affective job insecurity and include measures of both constructs in future research on the construct.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Psychological Assessment\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Psychological Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在不同的跨国样本中使用工作不安全感测量方法时,工作不安全感作为一种有效的预测指标,其既定测量不变性的经验证据可能会提高工作不安全感的实际效用。本研究调查了四个国家(即美国,N = 486;中国,N = 629;意大利,N = 482 和南非,N = 345)九个项目版本的工作安全感指数(衡量认知性工作不安全感)和工作安全感满意度量表(衡量情感性工作不安全感)的测量不变性。基于新颖的双因素-(S-1)模型方法,我们发现了实质性双因素-(S-1)结构的部分度量不变性、部分标量不变性和部分严格不变性的证据。这些结果扩展了有关工作不安全感的测量不变性研究,具有明显的实用意义(如标度单位、跨国解释的测量偏差):本研究为本研究中各民族工作不安全感得分的跨国比较的应用提供了证据支持。从理论上讲,这项研究推动了关于认知性工作不安全感和情感性工作不安全感之间关系性质的讨论,表明在这一跨国数据集中,将认知性工作不安全感指定为参考域的模型优于将情感性工作不安全感指定为参考域的模型。实际上,这表明区分认知性工作不安全感和情感性工作不安全感,并在今后的研究中纳入这两种建构的测量方法是明智和必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement invariance of cognitive and affective job insecurity: A cross-national study
Empirical evidence of established measurement invariance of job insecurity measures may enhance the practical utility of job insecurity as a valid predictor when utilised over different cross-national samples. This study investigated the measurement invariance of the nine-item versions of the Job Security Index (a measure of cognitive job insecurity) and the Job Security Satisfaction Scale (a measure of affective job insecurity), across four countries (i.e. the United States, N = 486; China, N = 629; Italy, N = 482 and South Africa, N = 345). Based on a novel bifactor-(S-1) model approach we found evidence for partial metric, partial scalar and partial strict invariance of our substantive bifactor-(S-1) structure. The results extend measurement invariance research on job insecurity with obvious pragmatic implications (e.g. scaling units, measurement bias over cross-national interpretations).Contribution: This research provides evidence to support the applied use of cross-national comparisons of job insecurity scores across the nationalities included in this study. Theoretically, this research advances the debate about the nature of the relationship between cognitive and affective job insecurity, suggesting that in this cross-national dataset, a model where cognitive job insecurity is specified as the reference domain outperforms a model where affective job insecurity is assigned this status. Practically, it demonstrates that it is sensible and necessary to differentiate between cognitive and affective job insecurity and include measures of both constructs in future research on the construct.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信