以人为本的老年人护理综合干预措施的有效性:瑞典经验回顾与专家观点。

IF 9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mariam Kirvalidze, Anne-Marie Boström, Ann Liljas, Megan Doheny, Anne Hendry, Brendan McCormack, Laura Fratiglioni, Sulin Ali, Zahra Ebrahimi, Sölve Elmståhl, Maria Eriksdotter, Pascal Gläske, Lena-Karin Gustafsson, Åsa Hedberg Rundgren, Helena Hvitfeldt, Carin Lennartsson, Lena Marmstål Hammar, Gunnar H Nilsson, Peter Nilsson, Joakim Öhlén, Anna Sandgren, Annika Söderman, Karl Swedberg, Nicoline Vackerberg, Davide Liborio Vetrano, Helle Wijk, Janne Agerholm, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga
{"title":"以人为本的老年人护理综合干预措施的有效性:瑞典经验回顾与专家观点。","authors":"Mariam Kirvalidze,&nbsp;Anne-Marie Boström,&nbsp;Ann Liljas,&nbsp;Megan Doheny,&nbsp;Anne Hendry,&nbsp;Brendan McCormack,&nbsp;Laura Fratiglioni,&nbsp;Sulin Ali,&nbsp;Zahra Ebrahimi,&nbsp;Sölve Elmståhl,&nbsp;Maria Eriksdotter,&nbsp;Pascal Gläske,&nbsp;Lena-Karin Gustafsson,&nbsp;Åsa Hedberg Rundgren,&nbsp;Helena Hvitfeldt,&nbsp;Carin Lennartsson,&nbsp;Lena Marmstål Hammar,&nbsp;Gunnar H Nilsson,&nbsp;Peter Nilsson,&nbsp;Joakim Öhlén,&nbsp;Anna Sandgren,&nbsp;Annika Söderman,&nbsp;Karl Swedberg,&nbsp;Nicoline Vackerberg,&nbsp;Davide Liborio Vetrano,&nbsp;Helle Wijk,&nbsp;Janne Agerholm,&nbsp;Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga","doi":"10.1111/joim.13784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Older adults have multiple medical and social care needs, requiring a shift toward an integrated person-centered model of care. Our objective was to describe and summarize Swedish experiences of integrated person-centered care by reviewing studies published between 2000 and 2023, and to identify the main challenges and scientific gaps through expert discussions. Seventy-three publications were identified by searching MEDLINE and contacting experts. Interventions were categorized using two World Health Organization frameworks: (1) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE), and (2) Integrated People-Centered Health Services (IPCHS). The included 73 publications were derived from 31 unique and heterogeneous interventions pertaining mainly to the micro- and meso-levels. Among publications measuring mortality, 15% were effective. Subjective health outcomes showed improvement in 24% of publications, morbidity outcomes in 42%, disability outcomes in 48%, and service utilization outcomes in 58%. Workshop discussions in Stockholm (Sweden), March 2023, were recorded, transcribed, and summarized. Experts emphasized: (1) lack of rigorous evaluation methods, (2) need for participatory designs, (3) scarcity of macro-level interventions, and (4) importance of transitioning from person- to people-centered integrated care. These challenges could explain the unexpected weak beneficial effects of the interventions on health outcomes, whereas service utilization outcomes were more positively impacted. Finally, we derived a list of recommendations, including the need to engage care organizations in interventions from their inception and to leverage researchers’ scientific expertise. Although this review provides a comprehensive snapshot of interventions in the context of Sweden, the findings offer transferable perspectives on the real-world challenges encountered in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"295 6","pages":"804-824"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joim.13784","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of integrated person-centered interventions for older people's care: Review of Swedish experiences and experts’ perspective\",\"authors\":\"Mariam Kirvalidze,&nbsp;Anne-Marie Boström,&nbsp;Ann Liljas,&nbsp;Megan Doheny,&nbsp;Anne Hendry,&nbsp;Brendan McCormack,&nbsp;Laura Fratiglioni,&nbsp;Sulin Ali,&nbsp;Zahra Ebrahimi,&nbsp;Sölve Elmståhl,&nbsp;Maria Eriksdotter,&nbsp;Pascal Gläske,&nbsp;Lena-Karin Gustafsson,&nbsp;Åsa Hedberg Rundgren,&nbsp;Helena Hvitfeldt,&nbsp;Carin Lennartsson,&nbsp;Lena Marmstål Hammar,&nbsp;Gunnar H Nilsson,&nbsp;Peter Nilsson,&nbsp;Joakim Öhlén,&nbsp;Anna Sandgren,&nbsp;Annika Söderman,&nbsp;Karl Swedberg,&nbsp;Nicoline Vackerberg,&nbsp;Davide Liborio Vetrano,&nbsp;Helle Wijk,&nbsp;Janne Agerholm,&nbsp;Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joim.13784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Older adults have multiple medical and social care needs, requiring a shift toward an integrated person-centered model of care. Our objective was to describe and summarize Swedish experiences of integrated person-centered care by reviewing studies published between 2000 and 2023, and to identify the main challenges and scientific gaps through expert discussions. Seventy-three publications were identified by searching MEDLINE and contacting experts. Interventions were categorized using two World Health Organization frameworks: (1) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE), and (2) Integrated People-Centered Health Services (IPCHS). The included 73 publications were derived from 31 unique and heterogeneous interventions pertaining mainly to the micro- and meso-levels. Among publications measuring mortality, 15% were effective. Subjective health outcomes showed improvement in 24% of publications, morbidity outcomes in 42%, disability outcomes in 48%, and service utilization outcomes in 58%. Workshop discussions in Stockholm (Sweden), March 2023, were recorded, transcribed, and summarized. Experts emphasized: (1) lack of rigorous evaluation methods, (2) need for participatory designs, (3) scarcity of macro-level interventions, and (4) importance of transitioning from person- to people-centered integrated care. These challenges could explain the unexpected weak beneficial effects of the interventions on health outcomes, whereas service utilization outcomes were more positively impacted. Finally, we derived a list of recommendations, including the need to engage care organizations in interventions from their inception and to leverage researchers’ scientific expertise. Although this review provides a comprehensive snapshot of interventions in the context of Sweden, the findings offer transferable perspectives on the real-world challenges encountered in this field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"295 6\",\"pages\":\"804-824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joim.13784\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.13784\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.13784","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年人有多种医疗和社会护理需求,需要向以人为本的综合护理模式转变。我们的目标是通过回顾 2000 年至 2023 年间发表的研究,描述并总结瑞典在以人为本的综合护理方面的经验,并通过专家讨论找出主要挑战和科学差距。通过搜索 MEDLINE 和联系专家,我们确定了 73 篇出版物。采用世界卫生组织的两个框架对干预措施进行了分类:(1)老年人综合护理(ICOPE)和(2)以人为本的综合健康服务(IPCHS)。收录的 73 篇出版物来自 31 种独特的、不同的干预措施,主要涉及微观和中观层面。在衡量死亡率的出版物中,15%是有效的。24%的出版物显示主观健康结果有所改善,42%的出版物显示发病结果有所改善,48%的出版物显示残疾结果有所改善,58%的出版物显示服务利用率有所改善。对 2023 年 3 月在斯德哥尔摩(瑞典)举行的研讨会讨论情况进行了记录、转录和总结。专家们强调:(1) 缺乏严格的评估方法,(2) 需要参与式设计,(3) 缺乏宏观层面的干预措施,(4) 必须从以人为本过渡到以人为本的综合护理。这些挑战可以解释为什么干预措施对健康结果的有益影响出乎意料地微弱,而对服务利用结果的影响则更为积极。最后,我们提出了一系列建议,包括需要让护理组织从一开始就参与干预,并充分利用研究人员的科学专业知识。虽然这篇综述提供了瑞典干预措施的全面概况,但研究结果为这一领域在现实世界中遇到的挑战提供了可借鉴的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effectiveness of integrated person-centered interventions for older people's care: Review of Swedish experiences and experts’ perspective

Effectiveness of integrated person-centered interventions for older people's care: Review of Swedish experiences and experts’ perspective

Older adults have multiple medical and social care needs, requiring a shift toward an integrated person-centered model of care. Our objective was to describe and summarize Swedish experiences of integrated person-centered care by reviewing studies published between 2000 and 2023, and to identify the main challenges and scientific gaps through expert discussions. Seventy-three publications were identified by searching MEDLINE and contacting experts. Interventions were categorized using two World Health Organization frameworks: (1) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE), and (2) Integrated People-Centered Health Services (IPCHS). The included 73 publications were derived from 31 unique and heterogeneous interventions pertaining mainly to the micro- and meso-levels. Among publications measuring mortality, 15% were effective. Subjective health outcomes showed improvement in 24% of publications, morbidity outcomes in 42%, disability outcomes in 48%, and service utilization outcomes in 58%. Workshop discussions in Stockholm (Sweden), March 2023, were recorded, transcribed, and summarized. Experts emphasized: (1) lack of rigorous evaluation methods, (2) need for participatory designs, (3) scarcity of macro-level interventions, and (4) importance of transitioning from person- to people-centered integrated care. These challenges could explain the unexpected weak beneficial effects of the interventions on health outcomes, whereas service utilization outcomes were more positively impacted. Finally, we derived a list of recommendations, including the need to engage care organizations in interventions from their inception and to leverage researchers’ scientific expertise. Although this review provides a comprehensive snapshot of interventions in the context of Sweden, the findings offer transferable perspectives on the real-world challenges encountered in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Internal Medicine
Journal of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JIM – The Journal of Internal Medicine, in continuous publication since 1863, is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original work in clinical science, spanning from bench to bedside, encompassing a wide range of internal medicine and its subspecialties. JIM showcases original articles, reviews, brief reports, and research letters in the field of internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信