通过四点弯梁和单轴疲劳试验评估纤维增强沥青混合料的疲劳性能

A. Khan, Ayman Ali, Yusuf Mehta, Wade Lein
{"title":"通过四点弯梁和单轴疲劳试验评估纤维增强沥青混合料的疲劳性能","authors":"A. Khan, Ayman Ali, Yusuf Mehta, Wade Lein","doi":"10.1177/03611981241243313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate the fatigue cracking potential of aramid fiber–reinforced asphalt mixtures. Three fiber-reinforced asphalt mixtures (FRAMs) were prepared employing a singular aggregate type (diabase stone), one binder type (PG76-22), and two distinct combinations of aramid fibers at varying dosages. Two types of fiber were used at different dosages by weight of mix: polyolefin/aramid (PFA) fibers at a dosage 0.05% and sasobit-coated aramid (SCA) fibers at dosages of 0.01% and 0.02%. Additionally, an unreinforced (control) mix was also produced for comparison purposes. Each of the mixtures was produced at a batch plant, adhering to the fiber manufacturer’s recommended mixing methods, while maintaining a constant binder content of 5.5% based on the total mix weight. Four-point beam (4PB) fatigue, uniaxial fatigue (UF), and Texas overlay tests (OT) were performed to characterize the fatigue and reflective cracking behavior of FRAM. The 4PB test results suggest that FRAM improved the fatigue life at lower strain levels (400 µε and 600 µε); however, at higher microstrain (800 µε) level, FRAM exhibited lower fatigue life than the control mix. Damage characteristic curves obtained from the UF tests showed better fatigue tolerance for reinforced mixtures, regardless of microstrain level. For cycles to failure under tensile loading, UF and OT test results indicated lower fatigue life of reinforced mixtures compared with the control mix. Therefore, under flexural loading the fiber-reinforced asphalt mixtures tend to improve the fatigue life. However, for direct tension load, reinforced mixtures tend to deteriorate the fatigue life when comparing cycles to failure at constant strain amplitude.","PeriodicalId":509035,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","volume":"4 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigue Performance Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Asphalt Mixtures with Four-Point Bending Beam and Uniaxial Fatigue Tests\",\"authors\":\"A. Khan, Ayman Ali, Yusuf Mehta, Wade Lein\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03611981241243313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to evaluate the fatigue cracking potential of aramid fiber–reinforced asphalt mixtures. Three fiber-reinforced asphalt mixtures (FRAMs) were prepared employing a singular aggregate type (diabase stone), one binder type (PG76-22), and two distinct combinations of aramid fibers at varying dosages. Two types of fiber were used at different dosages by weight of mix: polyolefin/aramid (PFA) fibers at a dosage 0.05% and sasobit-coated aramid (SCA) fibers at dosages of 0.01% and 0.02%. Additionally, an unreinforced (control) mix was also produced for comparison purposes. Each of the mixtures was produced at a batch plant, adhering to the fiber manufacturer’s recommended mixing methods, while maintaining a constant binder content of 5.5% based on the total mix weight. Four-point beam (4PB) fatigue, uniaxial fatigue (UF), and Texas overlay tests (OT) were performed to characterize the fatigue and reflective cracking behavior of FRAM. The 4PB test results suggest that FRAM improved the fatigue life at lower strain levels (400 µε and 600 µε); however, at higher microstrain (800 µε) level, FRAM exhibited lower fatigue life than the control mix. Damage characteristic curves obtained from the UF tests showed better fatigue tolerance for reinforced mixtures, regardless of microstrain level. For cycles to failure under tensile loading, UF and OT test results indicated lower fatigue life of reinforced mixtures compared with the control mix. Therefore, under flexural loading the fiber-reinforced asphalt mixtures tend to improve the fatigue life. However, for direct tension load, reinforced mixtures tend to deteriorate the fatigue life when comparing cycles to failure at constant strain amplitude.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241243313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241243313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估芳纶纤维增强型沥青混合料的疲劳开裂潜力。研究人员制备了三种纤维增强型沥青混合料(FRAM),分别采用了一种集料类型(辉绿岩石料)、一种粘结剂类型(PG76-22)和两种不同用量的芳纶纤维组合。按混合料重量计,使用了两种不同用量的纤维:聚烯烃/芳纶(PFA)纤维,用量为 0.05%;沙索比特包覆芳纶(SCA)纤维,用量分别为 0.01% 和 0.02%。此外,还生产了一种未加固(对照)混合物进行比较。每种混合物都是在批量工厂生产的,遵循纤维制造商推荐的混合方法,同时保持基于混合物总重量的 5.5% 粘结剂含量不变。对 FRAM 进行了四点梁(4PB)疲劳、单轴疲劳(UF)和德克萨斯叠层试验(OT),以确定其疲劳和反射开裂行为的特征。4PB 试验结果表明,在较低应变水平(400 µε 和 600 µε)下,FRAM 提高了疲劳寿命;但在较高微应变水平(800 µε)下,FRAM 的疲劳寿命低于对照混合料。从超频试验中获得的损伤特征曲线显示,无论微应变水平如何,增强混合物的疲劳耐受性都更好。对于拉伸荷载下的破坏循环,UF 和 OT 试验结果表明,与对照混合料相比,增强混合料的疲劳寿命较低。因此,在弯曲荷载下,纤维增强沥青混合料往往能提高疲劳寿命。然而,在直接拉伸荷载下,与恒定应变振幅下的破坏循环相比,增强混合料的疲劳寿命往往会缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fatigue Performance Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Asphalt Mixtures with Four-Point Bending Beam and Uniaxial Fatigue Tests
This study aimed to evaluate the fatigue cracking potential of aramid fiber–reinforced asphalt mixtures. Three fiber-reinforced asphalt mixtures (FRAMs) were prepared employing a singular aggregate type (diabase stone), one binder type (PG76-22), and two distinct combinations of aramid fibers at varying dosages. Two types of fiber were used at different dosages by weight of mix: polyolefin/aramid (PFA) fibers at a dosage 0.05% and sasobit-coated aramid (SCA) fibers at dosages of 0.01% and 0.02%. Additionally, an unreinforced (control) mix was also produced for comparison purposes. Each of the mixtures was produced at a batch plant, adhering to the fiber manufacturer’s recommended mixing methods, while maintaining a constant binder content of 5.5% based on the total mix weight. Four-point beam (4PB) fatigue, uniaxial fatigue (UF), and Texas overlay tests (OT) were performed to characterize the fatigue and reflective cracking behavior of FRAM. The 4PB test results suggest that FRAM improved the fatigue life at lower strain levels (400 µε and 600 µε); however, at higher microstrain (800 µε) level, FRAM exhibited lower fatigue life than the control mix. Damage characteristic curves obtained from the UF tests showed better fatigue tolerance for reinforced mixtures, regardless of microstrain level. For cycles to failure under tensile loading, UF and OT test results indicated lower fatigue life of reinforced mixtures compared with the control mix. Therefore, under flexural loading the fiber-reinforced asphalt mixtures tend to improve the fatigue life. However, for direct tension load, reinforced mixtures tend to deteriorate the fatigue life when comparing cycles to failure at constant strain amplitude.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信