不同来源种群的布鲁克鳟静息呼吸率的变化:对生物能模型的影响

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Cory M. Hartman, Kyle J. Hartman, Cory J. Bauerlien
{"title":"不同来源种群的布鲁克鳟静息呼吸率的变化:对生物能模型的影响","authors":"Cory M. Hartman, Kyle J. Hartman, Cory J. Bauerlien","doi":"10.1002/tafs.10469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our objective was to compare wild and hatchery sourced Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis to determine the importance of source population on routine respiration rate (RRR), the major cost term in bioenergetic models.We evaluated intraspecific variation in RRRs of one hatchery and four wild Brook Trout populations. Hatchery fish were obtained from the Bowden State Fish Hatchery in Elkins, West Virginia, and were the basis for the previously published bioenergetics model for the species. Wild fish were obtained from four headwater streams in West Virginia. Using intermittent respirometry, we measured and analyzed RRRs sequentially at 20, 16, and 12°C. Measures on hatchery fish were censored to restrict the dataset to similar sizes and temperatures as used with the wild populations. We used a suite of mixed effects models and one linear model to compare RRRs of hatchery fish with wild fish, as well as to determine whether wild populations differed.We found that the RRR of hatchery fish was double that of wild fish over the range of 12–20°C. Within the wild populations, the RRR of the Potomac drainage fish was lower than two of the three Ohio drainage populations despite all steams falling within 55 km of each other.Our findings suggest that selective pressures at the hatchery, as well as factors that influence thermal regimes in wild populations, likely influence RRR in Brook Trout. More research is needed to identify correlates related to intraspecific variation in fish respiration rates. Most fish bioenergetics models are not based on, or calibrated to, the specific population to which they are applied. Therefore, we encourage greater efforts be expended to calibrate and validate such models in the future.","PeriodicalId":23214,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The American Fisheries Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in resting respiration rate of Brook Trout among source populations: Implications for bioenergetic models\",\"authors\":\"Cory M. Hartman, Kyle J. Hartman, Cory J. Bauerlien\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tafs.10469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our objective was to compare wild and hatchery sourced Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis to determine the importance of source population on routine respiration rate (RRR), the major cost term in bioenergetic models.We evaluated intraspecific variation in RRRs of one hatchery and four wild Brook Trout populations. Hatchery fish were obtained from the Bowden State Fish Hatchery in Elkins, West Virginia, and were the basis for the previously published bioenergetics model for the species. Wild fish were obtained from four headwater streams in West Virginia. Using intermittent respirometry, we measured and analyzed RRRs sequentially at 20, 16, and 12°C. Measures on hatchery fish were censored to restrict the dataset to similar sizes and temperatures as used with the wild populations. We used a suite of mixed effects models and one linear model to compare RRRs of hatchery fish with wild fish, as well as to determine whether wild populations differed.We found that the RRR of hatchery fish was double that of wild fish over the range of 12–20°C. Within the wild populations, the RRR of the Potomac drainage fish was lower than two of the three Ohio drainage populations despite all steams falling within 55 km of each other.Our findings suggest that selective pressures at the hatchery, as well as factors that influence thermal regimes in wild populations, likely influence RRR in Brook Trout. More research is needed to identify correlates related to intraspecific variation in fish respiration rates. Most fish bioenergetics models are not based on, or calibrated to, the specific population to which they are applied. Therefore, we encourage greater efforts be expended to calibrate and validate such models in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of The American Fisheries Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of The American Fisheries Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The American Fisheries Society","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目标是比较野生和人工孵化的布鲁克鳟鱼,以确定来源种群对常规呼吸速率(RRR)的重要性,常规呼吸速率是生物能模型中的主要成本项。孵化鱼来自西弗吉尼亚州埃尔金斯的鲍登州立鱼类孵化场,是之前公布的该物种生物能模型的基础。野生鱼来自西弗吉尼亚州的四条上游溪流。我们使用间歇式呼吸测定法,在 20、16 和 12°C 温度条件下依次测量和分析 RRR。对孵化鱼的测量结果进行了删减,以便将数据集限制在与野生种群相似的大小和温度范围内。我们使用了一套混合效应模型和一个线性模型来比较孵化鱼与野生鱼的RRR,并确定野生种群是否存在差异。在野生种群中,波托马克河流域鱼类的RRR低于俄亥俄河流域三个种群中的两个,尽管所有水蒸气彼此相距都在55公里以内。还需要更多的研究来确定与鱼类呼吸速率种内差异相关的因素。大多数鱼类生物能模型都不是基于或校准适用的特定种群。因此,我们鼓励今后加大校准和验证此类模型的力度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation in resting respiration rate of Brook Trout among source populations: Implications for bioenergetic models
Our objective was to compare wild and hatchery sourced Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis to determine the importance of source population on routine respiration rate (RRR), the major cost term in bioenergetic models.We evaluated intraspecific variation in RRRs of one hatchery and four wild Brook Trout populations. Hatchery fish were obtained from the Bowden State Fish Hatchery in Elkins, West Virginia, and were the basis for the previously published bioenergetics model for the species. Wild fish were obtained from four headwater streams in West Virginia. Using intermittent respirometry, we measured and analyzed RRRs sequentially at 20, 16, and 12°C. Measures on hatchery fish were censored to restrict the dataset to similar sizes and temperatures as used with the wild populations. We used a suite of mixed effects models and one linear model to compare RRRs of hatchery fish with wild fish, as well as to determine whether wild populations differed.We found that the RRR of hatchery fish was double that of wild fish over the range of 12–20°C. Within the wild populations, the RRR of the Potomac drainage fish was lower than two of the three Ohio drainage populations despite all steams falling within 55 km of each other.Our findings suggest that selective pressures at the hatchery, as well as factors that influence thermal regimes in wild populations, likely influence RRR in Brook Trout. More research is needed to identify correlates related to intraspecific variation in fish respiration rates. Most fish bioenergetics models are not based on, or calibrated to, the specific population to which they are applied. Therefore, we encourage greater efforts be expended to calibrate and validate such models in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Transactions of the American Fisheries Society is a highly regarded international journal of fisheries science that has been published continuously since 1872. It features results of basic and applied research in genetics, physiology, biology, ecology, population dynamics, economics, health, culture, and other topics germane to marine and freshwater finfish and shellfish and their respective fisheries and environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信