经皮球囊扩张支架植入术治疗主动脉弓横向阻塞:一项回顾性多中心研究的中长期结果。

Arash Salavitabar, M. Eisner, Aimee K Armstrong, Brian Boe, Joanne L. Chisolm, J. Cheatham, S. Cheatham, Thomas Forbes, Thomas K Jones, G. Krings, B. Morray, Zachary L. Steinberg, Jyothsna Akam-Venkata, M. Voskuil, D. Berman
{"title":"经皮球囊扩张支架植入术治疗主动脉弓横向阻塞:一项回顾性多中心研究的中长期结果。","authors":"Arash Salavitabar, M. Eisner, Aimee K Armstrong, Brian Boe, Joanne L. Chisolm, J. Cheatham, S. Cheatham, Thomas Forbes, Thomas K Jones, G. Krings, B. Morray, Zachary L. Steinberg, Jyothsna Akam-Venkata, M. Voskuil, D. Berman","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nTransverse aortic arch obstruction is a challenging lesion for which stent implantation provides a potentially important alternate therapy. The objectives were to evaluate the technical, procedural, and medium-to-long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous stent implantation of transverse aortic arch obstruction.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis is a retrospective, multicenter study of transverse aortic arch stent implantation. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIndex catheterization included 187 stent implants in 146 patients. The median age is 14.3 years (interquartile range, 9.3-19), weight is 53 kg (30-69), and follow-up is 53 months (12-120). The most common stent design was open cell (n=90, 48%). Stents overlapped 142 arch vessels (37 carotid arteries) in 118 (81%) cases. Technical and procedural success rates were 100% and 88%, respectively. Lower weight (P=0.018), body surface area (P=0.013), and minimum-to-descending aortic diameter ratio (P<0.001) were associated with higher baseline aortic gradient. The residual gradient was inversely associated with implant and final dilation diameters (P<0.001). The combined incidence of aortic injury and stent-related complications was 14%. There were no reports of abnormal brain scans or stroke. Blood pressure cuff gradient, echocardiographic arch velocity, and hypertension rates improved within 1-year follow-up with increased antihypertensive medication use. Reintervention was reported in 60 (41%) patients at a median of 84 (22-148) months to first reintervention. On multivariable logistic regression, residual aortic gradient >10 mm Hg was associated with increased odds of reintervention at all time points when controlling for each final dilation diameter, weight, and minimum-to-descending aortic diameter ratio.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nTransverse aortic arch stent implantation has high rates of technical, procedural, and medium-to-long-term clinical success. Aortic gradient >10 mm Hg is associated with increased odds of reintervention at 1-year and most recent follow-ups. Open cell stent design was frequently used for its advantages in conformability, perfusion of arch vessels, low fracture rate, and the ability to perform effective angioplasty of side cells.","PeriodicalId":516631,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":"34 12","pages":"e013729"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous Balloon-Expandable Stent Implantation to Treat Transverse Aortic Arch Obstruction: Medium- to Long-Term Outcomes of a Retrospective Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Arash Salavitabar, M. Eisner, Aimee K Armstrong, Brian Boe, Joanne L. Chisolm, J. Cheatham, S. Cheatham, Thomas Forbes, Thomas K Jones, G. Krings, B. Morray, Zachary L. Steinberg, Jyothsna Akam-Venkata, M. Voskuil, D. Berman\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nTransverse aortic arch obstruction is a challenging lesion for which stent implantation provides a potentially important alternate therapy. The objectives were to evaluate the technical, procedural, and medium-to-long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous stent implantation of transverse aortic arch obstruction.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThis is a retrospective, multicenter study of transverse aortic arch stent implantation. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nIndex catheterization included 187 stent implants in 146 patients. The median age is 14.3 years (interquartile range, 9.3-19), weight is 53 kg (30-69), and follow-up is 53 months (12-120). The most common stent design was open cell (n=90, 48%). Stents overlapped 142 arch vessels (37 carotid arteries) in 118 (81%) cases. Technical and procedural success rates were 100% and 88%, respectively. Lower weight (P=0.018), body surface area (P=0.013), and minimum-to-descending aortic diameter ratio (P<0.001) were associated with higher baseline aortic gradient. The residual gradient was inversely associated with implant and final dilation diameters (P<0.001). The combined incidence of aortic injury and stent-related complications was 14%. There were no reports of abnormal brain scans or stroke. Blood pressure cuff gradient, echocardiographic arch velocity, and hypertension rates improved within 1-year follow-up with increased antihypertensive medication use. Reintervention was reported in 60 (41%) patients at a median of 84 (22-148) months to first reintervention. On multivariable logistic regression, residual aortic gradient >10 mm Hg was associated with increased odds of reintervention at all time points when controlling for each final dilation diameter, weight, and minimum-to-descending aortic diameter ratio.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nTransverse aortic arch stent implantation has high rates of technical, procedural, and medium-to-long-term clinical success. Aortic gradient >10 mm Hg is associated with increased odds of reintervention at 1-year and most recent follow-ups. Open cell stent design was frequently used for its advantages in conformability, perfusion of arch vessels, low fracture rate, and the ability to perform effective angioplasty of side cells.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions\",\"volume\":\"34 12\",\"pages\":\"e013729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景主动脉弓横向阻塞是一种具有挑战性的病变,支架植入术为其提供了一种潜在的重要替代疗法。研究目的是评估经皮主动脉弓横向阻塞支架植入术的技术、程序和中长期临床结果。结果索引导管检查包括 146 名患者的 187 个支架植入。中位年龄为 14.3 岁(四分位间范围为 9.3-19),体重为 53 公斤(30-69),随访时间为 53 个月(12-120)。最常见的支架设计是开孔支架(90 人,占 48%)。118例(81%)患者的支架与142条弓血管(37条颈动脉)重叠。技术成功率和手术成功率分别为100%和88%。较低的体重(P=0.018)、体表面积(P=0.013)和主动脉最小直径与降主动脉直径之比(P10 mm Hg)与所有时间点的再介入几率增加相关,但要控制每个最终扩张直径、体重和主动脉最小直径与降主动脉直径之比。主动脉梯度>10毫米汞柱与1年和最近随访时再次介入的几率增加有关。开放细胞支架设计因其在顺应性、拱形血管灌注、低骨折率以及对侧细胞进行有效血管成形术的能力等方面的优势而经常被使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous Balloon-Expandable Stent Implantation to Treat Transverse Aortic Arch Obstruction: Medium- to Long-Term Outcomes of a Retrospective Multicenter Study.
BACKGROUND Transverse aortic arch obstruction is a challenging lesion for which stent implantation provides a potentially important alternate therapy. The objectives were to evaluate the technical, procedural, and medium-to-long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous stent implantation of transverse aortic arch obstruction. METHODS This is a retrospective, multicenter study of transverse aortic arch stent implantation. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS Index catheterization included 187 stent implants in 146 patients. The median age is 14.3 years (interquartile range, 9.3-19), weight is 53 kg (30-69), and follow-up is 53 months (12-120). The most common stent design was open cell (n=90, 48%). Stents overlapped 142 arch vessels (37 carotid arteries) in 118 (81%) cases. Technical and procedural success rates were 100% and 88%, respectively. Lower weight (P=0.018), body surface area (P=0.013), and minimum-to-descending aortic diameter ratio (P<0.001) were associated with higher baseline aortic gradient. The residual gradient was inversely associated with implant and final dilation diameters (P<0.001). The combined incidence of aortic injury and stent-related complications was 14%. There were no reports of abnormal brain scans or stroke. Blood pressure cuff gradient, echocardiographic arch velocity, and hypertension rates improved within 1-year follow-up with increased antihypertensive medication use. Reintervention was reported in 60 (41%) patients at a median of 84 (22-148) months to first reintervention. On multivariable logistic regression, residual aortic gradient >10 mm Hg was associated with increased odds of reintervention at all time points when controlling for each final dilation diameter, weight, and minimum-to-descending aortic diameter ratio. CONCLUSIONS Transverse aortic arch stent implantation has high rates of technical, procedural, and medium-to-long-term clinical success. Aortic gradient >10 mm Hg is associated with increased odds of reintervention at 1-year and most recent follow-ups. Open cell stent design was frequently used for its advantages in conformability, perfusion of arch vessels, low fracture rate, and the ability to perform effective angioplasty of side cells.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信