急诊护理中护士和医生的领导理念:范围审查

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Andrew Rixon , Elizabeth Elder , Claudia Bull , Julia Crilly OAM , Christina Østervan , Hayley Frieslich , Shaun Robertson , Ed Pink , Samuel Wilson
{"title":"急诊护理中护士和医生的领导理念:范围审查","authors":"Andrew Rixon ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Elder ,&nbsp;Claudia Bull ,&nbsp;Julia Crilly OAM ,&nbsp;Christina Østervan ,&nbsp;Hayley Frieslich ,&nbsp;Shaun Robertson ,&nbsp;Ed Pink ,&nbsp;Samuel Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Emergency Department (ED) is a setting where teamwork and leadership is imperative, however, the literature to date is mostly discipline (nursing or medical) specific. This scoping review aimed to map what is known about nurses’ and physicians’ conceptions of leadership in the ED to understand similarities, differences, and opportunities for leadership development and research.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Guidelines, a systematic search of three electronic databases was performed. The Mixed Methods Assessment Tool was used for quality appraisal of included articles.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 37 articles were included. Four key findings emerged: 1) leadership was rarely explicitly defined; 2) nurse leaders tended to be characterised as agents of continuity whilst physician leaders tended to be characterised as agents of change and continuity; 3) the clarification of expectations from nurse leaders was more evident than expectations from physician leaders; and 4) leadership discourse tended to be traditional rather than contemporary.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite the proliferation of studies into ED nurse, physician and interprofessional leadership, opportunities exist to integrate learnings from other sectors to strengthen the development of current and next generation of ED leaders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24000491/pdfft?md5=14720e399e6b74aefd1737cefd454db0&pid=1-s2.0-S1755599X24000491-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leadership conceptions of nurses and physicians in emergency care: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Rixon ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Elder ,&nbsp;Claudia Bull ,&nbsp;Julia Crilly OAM ,&nbsp;Christina Østervan ,&nbsp;Hayley Frieslich ,&nbsp;Shaun Robertson ,&nbsp;Ed Pink ,&nbsp;Samuel Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Emergency Department (ED) is a setting where teamwork and leadership is imperative, however, the literature to date is mostly discipline (nursing or medical) specific. This scoping review aimed to map what is known about nurses’ and physicians’ conceptions of leadership in the ED to understand similarities, differences, and opportunities for leadership development and research.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Guidelines, a systematic search of three electronic databases was performed. The Mixed Methods Assessment Tool was used for quality appraisal of included articles.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 37 articles were included. Four key findings emerged: 1) leadership was rarely explicitly defined; 2) nurse leaders tended to be characterised as agents of continuity whilst physician leaders tended to be characterised as agents of change and continuity; 3) the clarification of expectations from nurse leaders was more evident than expectations from physician leaders; and 4) leadership discourse tended to be traditional rather than contemporary.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite the proliferation of studies into ED nurse, physician and interprofessional leadership, opportunities exist to integrate learnings from other sectors to strengthen the development of current and next generation of ED leaders.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24000491/pdfft?md5=14720e399e6b74aefd1737cefd454db0&pid=1-s2.0-S1755599X24000491-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24000491\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24000491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景急诊科(ED)是一个需要团队合作和领导力的环境,但迄今为止的文献大多是针对特定学科(护理或医疗)的。本范围界定综述旨在了解护士和医生对急诊科领导力的认识,从而了解两者的异同以及领导力发展和研究的机会。方法以乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的方法和范围界定综述的系统综述和元分析扩展首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)指南为指导,对三个电子数据库进行了系统检索。结果 共收录了 37 篇文章。结果共收录了 37 篇文章,其中有四项主要发现:1)领导力很少有明确的定义;2)护士领导往往被描述为连续性的推动者,而医生领导往往被描述为变革和连续性的推动者;3)护士领导对期望的澄清比医生领导对期望的澄清更明显;4)领导力的论述往往是传统的而非现代的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leadership conceptions of nurses and physicians in emergency care: A scoping review

Background

The Emergency Department (ED) is a setting where teamwork and leadership is imperative, however, the literature to date is mostly discipline (nursing or medical) specific. This scoping review aimed to map what is known about nurses’ and physicians’ conceptions of leadership in the ED to understand similarities, differences, and opportunities for leadership development and research.

Method

Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Guidelines, a systematic search of three electronic databases was performed. The Mixed Methods Assessment Tool was used for quality appraisal of included articles.

Results

In total, 37 articles were included. Four key findings emerged: 1) leadership was rarely explicitly defined; 2) nurse leaders tended to be characterised as agents of continuity whilst physician leaders tended to be characterised as agents of change and continuity; 3) the clarification of expectations from nurse leaders was more evident than expectations from physician leaders; and 4) leadership discourse tended to be traditional rather than contemporary.

Conclusion

Despite the proliferation of studies into ED nurse, physician and interprofessional leadership, opportunities exist to integrate learnings from other sectors to strengthen the development of current and next generation of ED leaders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信