新辅助化疗进行结节下移后省略腋窝切除术

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Giacomo Montagna, Mary M. Mrdutt, Susie X. Sun, Callie Hlavin, Emilia J. Diego, Stephanie M. Wong, Andrea V. Barrio, Astrid Botty van den Bruele, Neslihan Cabioglu, Varadan Sevilimedu, Laura H. Rosenberger, E. Shelley Hwang, Abigail Ingham, Bärbel Papassotiropoulos, Bich Doan Nguyen-Sträuli, Christian Kurzeder, Danilo Díaz Aybar, Denise Vorburger, Dieter Michael Matlac, Edvin Ostapenko, Fabian Riedel, Florian Fitzal, Francesco Meani, Franziska Fick, Jacqueline Sagasser, Jörg Heil, Hasan Karanlık, Konstantin J. Dedes, Laszlo Romics, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Mahmut Muslumanoglu, Maria Del Rosario Cueva Perez, Marcelo Chávez Díaz, Martin Heidinger, Mathias K. Fehr, Mattea Reinisch, Mustafa Tukenmez, Nadia Maggi, Nicola Rocco, Nina Ditsch, Oreste Davide Gentilini, Regis R. Paulinelli, Sebastián Solé Zarhi, Sherko Kuemmel, Simona Bruzas, Simona di Lascio, Tamara K. Parissenti, Tanya L. Hoskin, Uwe Güth, Valentina Ovalle, Christoph Tausch, Henry M. Kuerer, Abigail S. Caudle, Jean-Francois Boileau, Judy C. Boughey, Thorsten Kühn, Monica Morrow, Walter P. Weber
{"title":"新辅助化疗进行结节下移后省略腋窝切除术","authors":"Giacomo Montagna, Mary M. Mrdutt, Susie X. Sun, Callie Hlavin, Emilia J. Diego, Stephanie M. Wong, Andrea V. Barrio, Astrid Botty van den Bruele, Neslihan Cabioglu, Varadan Sevilimedu, Laura H. Rosenberger, E. Shelley Hwang, Abigail Ingham, Bärbel Papassotiropoulos, Bich Doan Nguyen-Sträuli, Christian Kurzeder, Danilo Díaz Aybar, Denise Vorburger, Dieter Michael Matlac, Edvin Ostapenko, Fabian Riedel, Florian Fitzal, Francesco Meani, Franziska Fick, Jacqueline Sagasser, Jörg Heil, Hasan Karanlık, Konstantin J. Dedes, Laszlo Romics, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Mahmut Muslumanoglu, Maria Del Rosario Cueva Perez, Marcelo Chávez Díaz, Martin Heidinger, Mathias K. Fehr, Mattea Reinisch, Mustafa Tukenmez, Nadia Maggi, Nicola Rocco, Nina Ditsch, Oreste Davide Gentilini, Regis R. Paulinelli, Sebastián Solé Zarhi, Sherko Kuemmel, Simona Bruzas, Simona di Lascio, Tamara K. Parissenti, Tanya L. Hoskin, Uwe Güth, Valentina Ovalle, Christoph Tausch, Henry M. Kuerer, Abigail S. Caudle, Jean-Francois Boileau, Judy C. Boughey, Thorsten Kühn, Monica Morrow, Walter P. Weber","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceData on oncological outcomes after omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with breast cancer that downstages from node positive to negative with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are sparse. Additionally, the best axillary surgical staging technique in this scenario is unknown.ObjectiveTo investigate oncological outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with dual-tracer mapping or targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which combines SLNB with localization and retrieval of the clipped lymph node.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this multicenter retrospective cohort study that was conducted at 25 centers in 11 countries, 1144 patients with consecutive stage II to III biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer were included between April 2013 and December 2020. The cumulative incidence rates of axillary, locoregional, and any invasive (locoregional or distant) recurrence were determined by competing risk analysis.ExposureOmission of ALND after SLNB or TAD.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end points were the 3-year and 5-year rates of any axillary recurrence. Secondary end points included locoregional recurrence, any invasive (locoregional and distant) recurrence, and the number of lymph nodes removed.ResultsA total of 1144 patients (median [IQR] age, 50 [41-59] years; 78 [6.8%] Asian, 105 [9.2%] Black, 102 [8.9%] Hispanic, and 816 [71.0%] White individuals; 666 SLNB [58.2%] and 478 TAD [41.8%]) were included. A total of 1060 patients (93%) had N1 disease, 619 (54%) had <jats:italic>ERBB2</jats:italic> (formerly <jats:italic>HER2</jats:italic>)–positive illness, and 758 (66%) had a breast pathologic complete response. TAD patients were more likely to receive nodal radiation therapy (85% vs 78%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .01). The clipped node was successfully retrieved in 97% of TAD cases and 86% of SLNB cases (without localization). The mean (SD) number of sentinel lymph nodes retrieved was 3 (2) vs 4 (2) (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001), and the mean (SD) number of total lymph nodes removed was 3.95 (1.97) vs 4.44 (2.04) (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001) in the TAD and SLNB groups, respectively. The 5-year rates of any axillary, locoregional, and any invasive recurrence in the entire cohort were 1.0% (95% CI, 0.49%-2.0%), 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.1%), and 10% (95% CI, 8.3%-13%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence did not differ between TAD and SLNB (0.5% vs 0.8%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .55).Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cohort study showed that axillary recurrence was rare in this setting and was not significantly lower after TAD vs SLNB. These results support omission of ALND in this population.","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Omission of Axillary Dissection Following Nodal Downstaging With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Giacomo Montagna, Mary M. Mrdutt, Susie X. Sun, Callie Hlavin, Emilia J. Diego, Stephanie M. Wong, Andrea V. Barrio, Astrid Botty van den Bruele, Neslihan Cabioglu, Varadan Sevilimedu, Laura H. Rosenberger, E. Shelley Hwang, Abigail Ingham, Bärbel Papassotiropoulos, Bich Doan Nguyen-Sträuli, Christian Kurzeder, Danilo Díaz Aybar, Denise Vorburger, Dieter Michael Matlac, Edvin Ostapenko, Fabian Riedel, Florian Fitzal, Francesco Meani, Franziska Fick, Jacqueline Sagasser, Jörg Heil, Hasan Karanlık, Konstantin J. Dedes, Laszlo Romics, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Mahmut Muslumanoglu, Maria Del Rosario Cueva Perez, Marcelo Chávez Díaz, Martin Heidinger, Mathias K. Fehr, Mattea Reinisch, Mustafa Tukenmez, Nadia Maggi, Nicola Rocco, Nina Ditsch, Oreste Davide Gentilini, Regis R. Paulinelli, Sebastián Solé Zarhi, Sherko Kuemmel, Simona Bruzas, Simona di Lascio, Tamara K. Parissenti, Tanya L. Hoskin, Uwe Güth, Valentina Ovalle, Christoph Tausch, Henry M. Kuerer, Abigail S. Caudle, Jean-Francois Boileau, Judy C. Boughey, Thorsten Kühn, Monica Morrow, Walter P. Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ImportanceData on oncological outcomes after omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with breast cancer that downstages from node positive to negative with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are sparse. Additionally, the best axillary surgical staging technique in this scenario is unknown.ObjectiveTo investigate oncological outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with dual-tracer mapping or targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which combines SLNB with localization and retrieval of the clipped lymph node.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this multicenter retrospective cohort study that was conducted at 25 centers in 11 countries, 1144 patients with consecutive stage II to III biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer were included between April 2013 and December 2020. The cumulative incidence rates of axillary, locoregional, and any invasive (locoregional or distant) recurrence were determined by competing risk analysis.ExposureOmission of ALND after SLNB or TAD.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end points were the 3-year and 5-year rates of any axillary recurrence. Secondary end points included locoregional recurrence, any invasive (locoregional and distant) recurrence, and the number of lymph nodes removed.ResultsA total of 1144 patients (median [IQR] age, 50 [41-59] years; 78 [6.8%] Asian, 105 [9.2%] Black, 102 [8.9%] Hispanic, and 816 [71.0%] White individuals; 666 SLNB [58.2%] and 478 TAD [41.8%]) were included. A total of 1060 patients (93%) had N1 disease, 619 (54%) had <jats:italic>ERBB2</jats:italic> (formerly <jats:italic>HER2</jats:italic>)–positive illness, and 758 (66%) had a breast pathologic complete response. TAD patients were more likely to receive nodal radiation therapy (85% vs 78%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .01). The clipped node was successfully retrieved in 97% of TAD cases and 86% of SLNB cases (without localization). The mean (SD) number of sentinel lymph nodes retrieved was 3 (2) vs 4 (2) (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001), and the mean (SD) number of total lymph nodes removed was 3.95 (1.97) vs 4.44 (2.04) (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001) in the TAD and SLNB groups, respectively. The 5-year rates of any axillary, locoregional, and any invasive recurrence in the entire cohort were 1.0% (95% CI, 0.49%-2.0%), 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.1%), and 10% (95% CI, 8.3%-13%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence did not differ between TAD and SLNB (0.5% vs 0.8%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .55).Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cohort study showed that axillary recurrence was rare in this setting and was not significantly lower after TAD vs SLNB. These results support omission of ALND in this population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":22.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性乳腺癌患者在接受新辅助化疗后从淋巴结阳性降至阴性,但省略腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)后的肿瘤治疗效果数据却很少。目的 研究前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)与双示踪剂绘图或靶向腋窝清扫(TAD)相结合后的肿瘤学结果。这项多中心回顾性队列研究在 11 个国家的 25 个中心进行,共纳入了 2013 年 4 月至 2020 年 12 月间连续 II 期至 III 期经活检证实为结节阳性的乳腺癌患者 1144 例。通过竞争风险分析确定了腋窝、局部和任何浸润性(局部或远处)复发的累积发生率。主要结果和测量主要终点是任何腋窝复发的3年和5年发生率。结果共纳入 1144 例患者(中位数[IQR]年龄 50 [41-59] 岁;78 [6.8%] 亚裔、105 [9.2%] 黑裔、102 [8.9%] 西班牙裔和 816 [71.0%] 白人;666 例 SLNB [58.2%] 和 478 例 TAD [41.8%])。共有 1060 名患者(93%)患有 N1 疾病,619 名患者(54%)ERBB2(原 HER2)阳性,758 名患者(66%)获得了乳腺病理完全反应。TAD患者更有可能接受结节放疗(85% vs 78%; P = .01)。97% 的 TAD 病例和 86% 的 SLNB 病例(未定位)成功取回了剪切的结节。TAD组和SLNB组取回的前哨淋巴结平均(标清)数分别为3(2)对4(2)(P&amp;lt; .001),切除的总淋巴结平均(标清)数分别为3.95(1.97)对4.44(2.04)(P&amp;lt; .001)。整个队列中任何腋窝、局部和任何浸润性复发的 5 年率分别为 1.0% (95% CI, 0.49%-2.0%), 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.1%) 和 10% (95% CI, 8.3%-13%) 。TAD和SLNB的3年腋窝复发累积发生率没有差异(0.5% vs 0.8%;P = .55)。结论和相关性这项队列研究的结果表明,在这种情况下腋窝复发很少见,而且TAD和SLNB术后腋窝复发率没有显著降低。这些结果支持在这一人群中省略 ALND。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Omission of Axillary Dissection Following Nodal Downstaging With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
ImportanceData on oncological outcomes after omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with breast cancer that downstages from node positive to negative with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are sparse. Additionally, the best axillary surgical staging technique in this scenario is unknown.ObjectiveTo investigate oncological outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with dual-tracer mapping or targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which combines SLNB with localization and retrieval of the clipped lymph node.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this multicenter retrospective cohort study that was conducted at 25 centers in 11 countries, 1144 patients with consecutive stage II to III biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer were included between April 2013 and December 2020. The cumulative incidence rates of axillary, locoregional, and any invasive (locoregional or distant) recurrence were determined by competing risk analysis.ExposureOmission of ALND after SLNB or TAD.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end points were the 3-year and 5-year rates of any axillary recurrence. Secondary end points included locoregional recurrence, any invasive (locoregional and distant) recurrence, and the number of lymph nodes removed.ResultsA total of 1144 patients (median [IQR] age, 50 [41-59] years; 78 [6.8%] Asian, 105 [9.2%] Black, 102 [8.9%] Hispanic, and 816 [71.0%] White individuals; 666 SLNB [58.2%] and 478 TAD [41.8%]) were included. A total of 1060 patients (93%) had N1 disease, 619 (54%) had ERBB2 (formerly HER2)–positive illness, and 758 (66%) had a breast pathologic complete response. TAD patients were more likely to receive nodal radiation therapy (85% vs 78%; P = .01). The clipped node was successfully retrieved in 97% of TAD cases and 86% of SLNB cases (without localization). The mean (SD) number of sentinel lymph nodes retrieved was 3 (2) vs 4 (2) (P &amp;lt; .001), and the mean (SD) number of total lymph nodes removed was 3.95 (1.97) vs 4.44 (2.04) (P &amp;lt; .001) in the TAD and SLNB groups, respectively. The 5-year rates of any axillary, locoregional, and any invasive recurrence in the entire cohort were 1.0% (95% CI, 0.49%-2.0%), 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.1%), and 10% (95% CI, 8.3%-13%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence did not differ between TAD and SLNB (0.5% vs 0.8%; P = .55).Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cohort study showed that axillary recurrence was rare in this setting and was not significantly lower after TAD vs SLNB. These results support omission of ALND in this population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Oncology
JAMA Oncology Medicine-Oncology
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: JAMA Oncology is an international peer-reviewed journal that serves as the leading publication for scientists, clinicians, and trainees working in the field of oncology. It is part of the JAMA Network, a collection of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信