以人为本的先进治疗药物安全性评估路线图

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Hsiao-Tzu Chien , Victoria C. de Leeuw , Joantine C.J. van Esterik , Frans G.M. Russel , Anne S. Kienhuis , Peter T. Theunissen , Peter van Meer
{"title":"以人为本的先进治疗药物安全性评估路线图","authors":"Hsiao-Tzu Chien ,&nbsp;Victoria C. de Leeuw ,&nbsp;Joantine C.J. van Esterik ,&nbsp;Frans G.M. Russel ,&nbsp;Anne S. Kienhuis ,&nbsp;Peter T. Theunissen ,&nbsp;Peter van Meer","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are among the most complex pharmaceuticals with high human specificity. Species differences severely limit the clinical relevance of <em>in vivo</em> data. We conducted interviews with stakeholders involved in ATMP development about their perspective on the use of <em>in vivo</em> studies, the perceived hurdles and associated potential solutions regarding non-clinical development of ATMPs. In total, 17 stakeholders from 9 different countries were interviewed. A workshop was held with key stakeholders to further discuss major topics identified from the interviews. Conducting <em>in vivo</em> studies remains the status quo for ATMPs development. The hurdles identified included determining the amount of information required before clinical entry and effective use of limited human samples to understand a treatment or for clinical monitoring. A number of key points defined the need for future <em>in vivo</em> studies as well as improved application and implementation of New Approach Methodology (NAM)-based approach for products within a well-known modality or technology platform. These included data transparency, understanding of the added value of <em>in vivo</em> studies, and continuous advancement, evaluation, and qualification of NAMs. Based on the outcome of the discussions, a roadmap with practical steps towards a human-centric safety assessment of ATMPs was established.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 105631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000722/pdfft?md5=6cf26190c59ba73b29910e21c17fc152&pid=1-s2.0-S0273230024000722-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A roadmap towards a human-centric safety assessment of advanced therapy medicinal products\",\"authors\":\"Hsiao-Tzu Chien ,&nbsp;Victoria C. de Leeuw ,&nbsp;Joantine C.J. van Esterik ,&nbsp;Frans G.M. Russel ,&nbsp;Anne S. Kienhuis ,&nbsp;Peter T. Theunissen ,&nbsp;Peter van Meer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are among the most complex pharmaceuticals with high human specificity. Species differences severely limit the clinical relevance of <em>in vivo</em> data. We conducted interviews with stakeholders involved in ATMP development about their perspective on the use of <em>in vivo</em> studies, the perceived hurdles and associated potential solutions regarding non-clinical development of ATMPs. In total, 17 stakeholders from 9 different countries were interviewed. A workshop was held with key stakeholders to further discuss major topics identified from the interviews. Conducting <em>in vivo</em> studies remains the status quo for ATMPs development. The hurdles identified included determining the amount of information required before clinical entry and effective use of limited human samples to understand a treatment or for clinical monitoring. A number of key points defined the need for future <em>in vivo</em> studies as well as improved application and implementation of New Approach Methodology (NAM)-based approach for products within a well-known modality or technology platform. These included data transparency, understanding of the added value of <em>in vivo</em> studies, and continuous advancement, evaluation, and qualification of NAMs. Based on the outcome of the discussions, a roadmap with practical steps towards a human-centric safety assessment of ATMPs was established.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000722/pdfft?md5=6cf26190c59ba73b29910e21c17fc152&pid=1-s2.0-S0273230024000722-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000722\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000722","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先期治疗药物(ATMP)是最复杂的药物之一,具有高度的人体特异性。物种差异严重限制了体内数据的临床相关性。我们对参与 ATMP 开发的利益相关者进行了访谈,了解他们对使用体内研究的看法、认为存在的障碍以及与 ATMP 非临床开发相关的潜在解决方案。总共采访了来自 9 个不同国家的 17 位利益相关者。与主要利益相关者举行了一次研讨会,进一步讨论访谈中确定的主要议题。进行体内研究仍是 ATMP 开发的现状。所发现的障碍包括确定进入临床前所需的信息量,以及有效利用有限的人体样本来了解治疗或进行临床监测。一些关键点决定了今后需要进行体内研究,并改进对知名模式或技术平台内产品的新方法(NAM)的应用和实施。其中包括数据透明度、了解体内研究的附加值,以及不断改进、评估和鉴定新方法。根据讨论结果,制定了一个路线图,其中包括实现以人为本的 ATMP 安全性评估的实际步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A roadmap towards a human-centric safety assessment of advanced therapy medicinal products

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are among the most complex pharmaceuticals with high human specificity. Species differences severely limit the clinical relevance of in vivo data. We conducted interviews with stakeholders involved in ATMP development about their perspective on the use of in vivo studies, the perceived hurdles and associated potential solutions regarding non-clinical development of ATMPs. In total, 17 stakeholders from 9 different countries were interviewed. A workshop was held with key stakeholders to further discuss major topics identified from the interviews. Conducting in vivo studies remains the status quo for ATMPs development. The hurdles identified included determining the amount of information required before clinical entry and effective use of limited human samples to understand a treatment or for clinical monitoring. A number of key points defined the need for future in vivo studies as well as improved application and implementation of New Approach Methodology (NAM)-based approach for products within a well-known modality or technology platform. These included data transparency, understanding of the added value of in vivo studies, and continuous advancement, evaluation, and qualification of NAMs. Based on the outcome of the discussions, a roadmap with practical steps towards a human-centric safety assessment of ATMPs was established.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信