对用作新型食品配料的根瘤藻真菌生物质的潜在过敏性进行硅学评估

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Kevin Scaife , Steve L. Taylor , Lucie Pařenicová , Richard E. Goodman , Trung D. Vo , Elisa Leune , Mohamed Abdelmoteleb , Yvonne Dommels
{"title":"对用作新型食品配料的根瘤藻真菌生物质的潜在过敏性进行硅学评估","authors":"Kevin Scaife ,&nbsp;Steve L. Taylor ,&nbsp;Lucie Pařenicová ,&nbsp;Richard E. Goodman ,&nbsp;Trung D. Vo ,&nbsp;Elisa Leune ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdelmoteleb ,&nbsp;Yvonne Dommels","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The world’s hunger for novel food ingredients drives the development of safe, sustainable, and nutritious novel food products. For foods containing novel proteins, potential allergenicity of the proteins is a key safety consideration. One such product is a fungal biomass obtained from the fermentation of <em>Rhizomucor pusillus</em>. The annotated whole genome sequence of this strain was subjected to sequence homology searches against the AllergenOnline database (sliding 80–amino acid windows and full sequence searches). In a stepwise manner, proteins were designated as potentially allergenic and were further compared to proteins from commonly consumed foods and from humans. From the sliding 80-mer searches, 356 proteins met the conservative &gt;35% Codex Alimentarius threshold, 72 of which shared ≥50% identity over the full sequence. Although matches were identified between <em>R. pusillus</em> proteins and proteins from allergenic food sources, the matches were limited to minor allergens from these sources, and they shared a greater degree of sequence homology with those from commonly consumed foods and human proteins. Based on the in silico analysis and a literature review for the source organism, the risk of allergenic cross-reactivity of <em>R. pusillus</em> is low.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 105629"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In silico evaluation of the potential allergenicity of a fungal biomass from Rhizomucor pusillus for use as a novel food ingredient\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Scaife ,&nbsp;Steve L. Taylor ,&nbsp;Lucie Pařenicová ,&nbsp;Richard E. Goodman ,&nbsp;Trung D. Vo ,&nbsp;Elisa Leune ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdelmoteleb ,&nbsp;Yvonne Dommels\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The world’s hunger for novel food ingredients drives the development of safe, sustainable, and nutritious novel food products. For foods containing novel proteins, potential allergenicity of the proteins is a key safety consideration. One such product is a fungal biomass obtained from the fermentation of <em>Rhizomucor pusillus</em>. The annotated whole genome sequence of this strain was subjected to sequence homology searches against the AllergenOnline database (sliding 80–amino acid windows and full sequence searches). In a stepwise manner, proteins were designated as potentially allergenic and were further compared to proteins from commonly consumed foods and from humans. From the sliding 80-mer searches, 356 proteins met the conservative &gt;35% Codex Alimentarius threshold, 72 of which shared ≥50% identity over the full sequence. Although matches were identified between <em>R. pusillus</em> proteins and proteins from allergenic food sources, the matches were limited to minor allergens from these sources, and they shared a greater degree of sequence homology with those from commonly consumed foods and human proteins. Based on the in silico analysis and a literature review for the source organism, the risk of allergenic cross-reactivity of <em>R. pusillus</em> is low.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000709\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000709","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球对新型食品配料的需求推动着安全、可持续和营养型新型食品的开发。对于含有新型蛋白质的食品来说,蛋白质的潜在过敏性是一个关键的安全考虑因素。从根瘤菌(Rhizomucor pusillus)发酵中获得的真菌生物质就是这样一种产品。该菌株的注释全基因组序列在 AllergenOnline 数据库中进行了序列同源性搜索(滑动 80 氨基酸窗口和全序列搜索)。以循序渐进的方式,将蛋白质指定为潜在过敏原,并进一步与常见食物和人类蛋白质进行比较。通过 80 个聚合物的滑动搜索,356 个蛋白质达到了保守的 35% 食品法典阈值,其中 72 个蛋白质的全序列同一性≥50%。虽然发现了R. pusillus蛋白与来自过敏性食物来源的蛋白之间的匹配,但这些匹配仅限于来自这些来源的次要过敏原,而且它们与来自常见食物和人类蛋白的序列同源性更高。根据对源生物的硅学分析和文献综述,R. pusillus 的过敏原交叉反应风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In silico evaluation of the potential allergenicity of a fungal biomass from Rhizomucor pusillus for use as a novel food ingredient

The world’s hunger for novel food ingredients drives the development of safe, sustainable, and nutritious novel food products. For foods containing novel proteins, potential allergenicity of the proteins is a key safety consideration. One such product is a fungal biomass obtained from the fermentation of Rhizomucor pusillus. The annotated whole genome sequence of this strain was subjected to sequence homology searches against the AllergenOnline database (sliding 80–amino acid windows and full sequence searches). In a stepwise manner, proteins were designated as potentially allergenic and were further compared to proteins from commonly consumed foods and from humans. From the sliding 80-mer searches, 356 proteins met the conservative >35% Codex Alimentarius threshold, 72 of which shared ≥50% identity over the full sequence. Although matches were identified between R. pusillus proteins and proteins from allergenic food sources, the matches were limited to minor allergens from these sources, and they shared a greater degree of sequence homology with those from commonly consumed foods and human proteins. Based on the in silico analysis and a literature review for the source organism, the risk of allergenic cross-reactivity of R. pusillus is low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信