{"title":"重新想象共和国:阿尔比恩-W-图尔盖文学作品中的种族、公民身份和民族》,桑德拉-M-古斯塔夫森和罗伯特-S-莱文编(评论)","authors":"Amanda K. Frisken","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a925477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, and Nation in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée</em> ed. by Sandra M. Gustafson and Robert S. Levine <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Amanda K. Frisken </li> </ul> <em>Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, and Nation in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée</em>. Edited by Sandra M. Gustafson and Robert S. Levine. Foreword by Carolyn L. Karcher. Reconstructing America. (New York: Fordham University Press, 2023. Pp. xviii, 280. Paper, $35.00, ISBN 978-1-5315-0137-2; cloth, $125.00, ISBN 978-1-5315-0136-5.) <p>Albion W. Tourgée, best remembered as lead counsel for the plaintiff in the <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896) case, was also a celebrated novelist in the decades after the Civil War. <em>Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, and Nation in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée</em> restores its subject’s advocacy for Reconstruction-era advances in race relations and human rights as a novelist, editor, and literary critic. Grouped thematically in three sections, this collection’s essays illuminate Tourgée’s literary quest for racial justice.</p> <p>The first section considers Tourgée’s approach to racial representation. Robert S. Levine argues that Tourgée channeled gothic tropes in his first novel, <em>Toinette</em> (1874), to suggest slavery’s lingering impact on postemancipation American life. While, as John Ernest contends, unacknowledged white privilege in <em>A Fool’s Errand</em> (1879) may limit the novel’s relevance today, Nancy Bentley’s essay argues that Tourgée also “uncovered a dissonance between white” legal conceptions of family and the complexities of Black kinship in his second Reconstruction-era novel, <em>Bricks Without Straw</em> (1880) (p. 50). Further, Tourgée’s insistence that “true Christians” repent for slavery distinguishes <em>Pactolus Prime</em> (1890), as DeLisa D. Hawkes points out, “as one of the earliest American novels to make a case for reparations” (pp. 60, 58). He also influenced African American literature. As Tess Chakkalakal’s essay demonstrates, his glowing endorsement of Charles W. Chesnutt’s early fiction helped Tourgée “alter the American literary landscape” (p. 76). Jennifer Rae <strong>[End Page 447]</strong> Greeson argues Tourgée’s “inescapable” literary presence left persisting traces in the fiction of both Chesnutt and Anna Julia Cooper (p. 85).</p> <p>Part 2 explores Tourgée’s political ideals, beginning with his oft-repeated faith that the edifice of “republican citizenship” was sufficient to stem the tide of violence unleashed by former elites to reverse Reconstruction policies (p. 102). Though Tourgée’s ideals of citizenship often centered the experiences of elites rather than working-class Black communities, his Reconstruction-era fiction nevertheless established his expansive critique of life in a postslavery South as a “tangle of unfreedoms facing the freedpeople,” which, as Christine Holbo points out, informed his later legal arguments in <em>Plessy</em> (p. 126). In <em>Button’s Inn</em> (1887), Tourgée further expanded his vision of social justice to include a more equitable domestic economy. His combination of legal and literary advocacy here, and in <em>Fool’s Errand</em>, constituted “a sweeping intellectual effort to forge the new nation into being,” according to Almas Khan, while the sympathetic and realistic portrayals of a freedman seeking legal redress in <em>With Gauge and Swallow, Attorneys</em> (1889) reflected Tourgée’s optimism in the years before the devastating <em>Plessy</em> decision (p. 151).</p> <p>Tourgée’s moral vision for the nation animates the final section. His recurring figure of an amputee veteran as a Freedmen’s Bureau official, for example, made visible, as Sarah E. Chinn writes, the nation’s “sacrifice and commitment to permanent change in political, economic, and social relations” (p. 182). Annemarie Mott Ewing contends that Tourgée’s portrayals of the railroad situated citizenship struggles within “the larger context of the imperialistic practices of westward expansion enabled by corporate power” (p. 204). Yet for all of his advocacy, neither Tourgée’s novels nor his short-lived illustrated weekly <em>Our Continent</em> (1882–1884) managed to dislodge the penchant for national forgetting or the retreat from the ideal of the rights of the vulnerable. Immediately after the war, he embraced revenge narratives to resist the impulse to valorize the Confederacy and to defend the war’s moral victory. Ironically, by the turn of the...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, and Nation in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée ed. by Sandra M. Gustafson and Robert S. Levine (review)\",\"authors\":\"Amanda K. Frisken\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/soh.2024.a925477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, and Nation in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée</em> ed. by Sandra M. Gustafson and Robert S. Levine <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Amanda K. Frisken </li> </ul> <em>Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, and Nation in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée</em>. Edited by Sandra M. Gustafson and Robert S. Levine. Foreword by Carolyn L. Karcher. Reconstructing America. (New York: Fordham University Press, 2023. Pp. xviii, 280. Paper, $35.00, ISBN 978-1-5315-0137-2; cloth, $125.00, ISBN 978-1-5315-0136-5.) <p>Albion W. Tourgée, best remembered as lead counsel for the plaintiff in the <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896) case, was also a celebrated novelist in the decades after the Civil War. <em>Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, and Nation in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée</em> restores its subject’s advocacy for Reconstruction-era advances in race relations and human rights as a novelist, editor, and literary critic. Grouped thematically in three sections, this collection’s essays illuminate Tourgée’s literary quest for racial justice.</p> <p>The first section considers Tourgée’s approach to racial representation. Robert S. Levine argues that Tourgée channeled gothic tropes in his first novel, <em>Toinette</em> (1874), to suggest slavery’s lingering impact on postemancipation American life. While, as John Ernest contends, unacknowledged white privilege in <em>A Fool’s Errand</em> (1879) may limit the novel’s relevance today, Nancy Bentley’s essay argues that Tourgée also “uncovered a dissonance between white” legal conceptions of family and the complexities of Black kinship in his second Reconstruction-era novel, <em>Bricks Without Straw</em> (1880) (p. 50). Further, Tourgée’s insistence that “true Christians” repent for slavery distinguishes <em>Pactolus Prime</em> (1890), as DeLisa D. Hawkes points out, “as one of the earliest American novels to make a case for reparations” (pp. 60, 58). He also influenced African American literature. As Tess Chakkalakal’s essay demonstrates, his glowing endorsement of Charles W. Chesnutt’s early fiction helped Tourgée “alter the American literary landscape” (p. 76). Jennifer Rae <strong>[End Page 447]</strong> Greeson argues Tourgée’s “inescapable” literary presence left persisting traces in the fiction of both Chesnutt and Anna Julia Cooper (p. 85).</p> <p>Part 2 explores Tourgée’s political ideals, beginning with his oft-repeated faith that the edifice of “republican citizenship” was sufficient to stem the tide of violence unleashed by former elites to reverse Reconstruction policies (p. 102). Though Tourgée’s ideals of citizenship often centered the experiences of elites rather than working-class Black communities, his Reconstruction-era fiction nevertheless established his expansive critique of life in a postslavery South as a “tangle of unfreedoms facing the freedpeople,” which, as Christine Holbo points out, informed his later legal arguments in <em>Plessy</em> (p. 126). In <em>Button’s Inn</em> (1887), Tourgée further expanded his vision of social justice to include a more equitable domestic economy. His combination of legal and literary advocacy here, and in <em>Fool’s Errand</em>, constituted “a sweeping intellectual effort to forge the new nation into being,” according to Almas Khan, while the sympathetic and realistic portrayals of a freedman seeking legal redress in <em>With Gauge and Swallow, Attorneys</em> (1889) reflected Tourgée’s optimism in the years before the devastating <em>Plessy</em> decision (p. 151).</p> <p>Tourgée’s moral vision for the nation animates the final section. His recurring figure of an amputee veteran as a Freedmen’s Bureau official, for example, made visible, as Sarah E. Chinn writes, the nation’s “sacrifice and commitment to permanent change in political, economic, and social relations” (p. 182). Annemarie Mott Ewing contends that Tourgée’s portrayals of the railroad situated citizenship struggles within “the larger context of the imperialistic practices of westward expansion enabled by corporate power” (p. 204). Yet for all of his advocacy, neither Tourgée’s novels nor his short-lived illustrated weekly <em>Our Continent</em> (1882–1884) managed to dislodge the penchant for national forgetting or the retreat from the ideal of the rights of the vulnerable. Immediately after the war, he embraced revenge narratives to resist the impulse to valorize the Confederacy and to defend the war’s moral victory. Ironically, by the turn of the...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a925477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a925477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: Reimagining the Republic:由 Sandra M. Gustafson 和 Robert S. Levine 编辑 Amanda K. Frisken Reimagining the Republic:阿尔比恩-W-图尔盖文学作品中的种族、公民身份和民族。Sandra M. Gustafson 和 Robert S. Levine 编辑。前言:Carolyn L. Karcher。重建美国》。(New York:福特汉姆大学出版社,2023 年。Pp.纸质版,35.00 美元,ISBN 978-1-5315-0137-2;布质版,125.00 美元,ISBN 978-1-5315-0136-5)。阿尔比恩-W-图尔基(Albion W. Tourgée),因在普莱西诉弗格森案(1896 年)中担任原告的首席律师而为人们所熟知,他也是南北战争后几十年间著名的小说家。重新想象共和国》(Reimagining the Republic:重新想象共和国:阿尔比恩-W-图尔基文学作品中的种族、公民身份和国家》还原了作者作为小说家、编辑和文学评论家对重建时期种族关系和人权进步的倡导。这本文集的文章按主题分为三个部分,阐明了图尔基在文学上对种族正义的追求。第一部分探讨了图尔盖的种族表现方法。Robert S. Levine 认为,图尔盖在他的第一部小说《Toinette》(1874 年)中采用了哥特式的表现手法,暗示了奴隶制对解放后美国生活的持续影响。南希-本特利(Nancy Bentley)的文章认为,图尔盖在重建时期的第二部小说《没有稻草的砖块》(1880 年)中 "揭示了白人 "对家庭的法律概念与黑人亲属关系的复杂性之间的 "不协调"(第 50 页)。此外,正如 DeLisa D. Hawkes 所说,图尔盖坚持 "真正的基督徒 "要为奴隶制忏悔,这使得《Pactolus Prime》(1890 年)"成为最早提出赔偿要求的美国小说之一"(第 60 和 58 页)。他还影响了美国黑人文学。正如 Tess Chakkalakal 的文章所述,他对查尔斯-W-切斯纳特早期小说的赞誉帮助图尔盖 "改变了美国文学的格局"(第 76 页)。Jennifer Rae [第447页完] Greeson 认为,图尔盖 "不可避免的 "文学存在在切斯纳特和安娜-朱莉娅-库珀的小说中留下了持久的痕迹(第85页)。第 2 部分探讨了图尔盖的政治理想,首先是他经常重申的信念,即 "共和公民 "的大厦足以阻挡前精英为扭转重建政策而发动的暴力浪潮(第 102 页)。虽然图尔盖的公民权理想往往以精英阶层而非黑人工人阶级的经历为中心,但他在重建时期的小说却确立了他对奴隶制结束后南方生活的广阔批判,将其视为 "自由人面临的不自由的纠结",正如克里斯汀-霍尔博所指出的,这为他后来在《普莱西案》中的法律论据提供了依据(第 126 页)。在《Button's Inn》(1887 年)中,图尔盖进一步扩展了他的社会正义观,将更公平的家庭经济纳入其中。阿尔玛斯-汗(Almas Khan)认为,他在《傻瓜的任务》(Fool's Errand)中将法律和文学主张结合起来,构成了 "为建立新国家而做出的全面的思想努力",而在《律师高格和燕子》(With Gauge and Swallow, Attorneys,1889 年)中对寻求法律补救的自由人的同情和现实描写,反映了图尔盖在普莱西案判决前几年的乐观主义(第 151 页)。图尔盖对国家的道德愿景为最后一部分注入了活力。例如,正如萨拉-E-钱恩(Sarah E. Chinn)所写的那样,他反复塑造的截肢老兵作为自由人局官员的形象,让人们看到了国家 "为永久改变政治、经济和社会关系而做出的牺牲和承诺"(第 182 页)。安妮玛丽-莫特-尤因(Annemarie Mott Ewing)认为,图尔盖对铁路的描绘将公民权的斗争置于 "公司权力促成的帝国主义西进扩张实践的大背景下"(第 204 页)。然而,尽管图尔盖竭力宣传,但他的小说和他的短命插图周刊《我们的大陆》(1882-1884 年)都未能摆脱民族遗忘的嗜好或弱者权利理想的退却。战后,他立即采用复仇叙事来抵制美化南方联盟的冲动,并捍卫战争在道义上的胜利。具有讽刺意味的是,到了...
Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, and Nation in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée ed. by Sandra M. Gustafson and Robert S. Levine (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Reviewed by:
Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, and Nation in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée ed. by Sandra M. Gustafson and Robert S. Levine
Amanda K. Frisken
Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, and Nation in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée. Edited by Sandra M. Gustafson and Robert S. Levine. Foreword by Carolyn L. Karcher. Reconstructing America. (New York: Fordham University Press, 2023. Pp. xviii, 280. Paper, $35.00, ISBN 978-1-5315-0137-2; cloth, $125.00, ISBN 978-1-5315-0136-5.)
Albion W. Tourgée, best remembered as lead counsel for the plaintiff in the Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) case, was also a celebrated novelist in the decades after the Civil War. Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, and Nation in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée restores its subject’s advocacy for Reconstruction-era advances in race relations and human rights as a novelist, editor, and literary critic. Grouped thematically in three sections, this collection’s essays illuminate Tourgée’s literary quest for racial justice.
The first section considers Tourgée’s approach to racial representation. Robert S. Levine argues that Tourgée channeled gothic tropes in his first novel, Toinette (1874), to suggest slavery’s lingering impact on postemancipation American life. While, as John Ernest contends, unacknowledged white privilege in A Fool’s Errand (1879) may limit the novel’s relevance today, Nancy Bentley’s essay argues that Tourgée also “uncovered a dissonance between white” legal conceptions of family and the complexities of Black kinship in his second Reconstruction-era novel, Bricks Without Straw (1880) (p. 50). Further, Tourgée’s insistence that “true Christians” repent for slavery distinguishes Pactolus Prime (1890), as DeLisa D. Hawkes points out, “as one of the earliest American novels to make a case for reparations” (pp. 60, 58). He also influenced African American literature. As Tess Chakkalakal’s essay demonstrates, his glowing endorsement of Charles W. Chesnutt’s early fiction helped Tourgée “alter the American literary landscape” (p. 76). Jennifer Rae [End Page 447] Greeson argues Tourgée’s “inescapable” literary presence left persisting traces in the fiction of both Chesnutt and Anna Julia Cooper (p. 85).
Part 2 explores Tourgée’s political ideals, beginning with his oft-repeated faith that the edifice of “republican citizenship” was sufficient to stem the tide of violence unleashed by former elites to reverse Reconstruction policies (p. 102). Though Tourgée’s ideals of citizenship often centered the experiences of elites rather than working-class Black communities, his Reconstruction-era fiction nevertheless established his expansive critique of life in a postslavery South as a “tangle of unfreedoms facing the freedpeople,” which, as Christine Holbo points out, informed his later legal arguments in Plessy (p. 126). In Button’s Inn (1887), Tourgée further expanded his vision of social justice to include a more equitable domestic economy. His combination of legal and literary advocacy here, and in Fool’s Errand, constituted “a sweeping intellectual effort to forge the new nation into being,” according to Almas Khan, while the sympathetic and realistic portrayals of a freedman seeking legal redress in With Gauge and Swallow, Attorneys (1889) reflected Tourgée’s optimism in the years before the devastating Plessy decision (p. 151).
Tourgée’s moral vision for the nation animates the final section. His recurring figure of an amputee veteran as a Freedmen’s Bureau official, for example, made visible, as Sarah E. Chinn writes, the nation’s “sacrifice and commitment to permanent change in political, economic, and social relations” (p. 182). Annemarie Mott Ewing contends that Tourgée’s portrayals of the railroad situated citizenship struggles within “the larger context of the imperialistic practices of westward expansion enabled by corporate power” (p. 204). Yet for all of his advocacy, neither Tourgée’s novels nor his short-lived illustrated weekly Our Continent (1882–1884) managed to dislodge the penchant for national forgetting or the retreat from the ideal of the rights of the vulnerable. Immediately after the war, he embraced revenge narratives to resist the impulse to valorize the Confederacy and to defend the war’s moral victory. Ironically, by the turn of the...