失落事业的讲坛:重建期间前邦联牧师的信仰与政治》,史蒂夫-朗格纳克著(评论)

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Brendan J. J. Payne
{"title":"失落事业的讲坛:重建期间前邦联牧师的信仰与政治》,史蒂夫-朗格纳克著(评论)","authors":"Brendan J. J. Payne","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a925473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Pulpits of the Lost Cause: The Faith and Politics of Former Confederate Chaplains during Reconstruction</em> by Steve Longenecker <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Brendan J. J. Payne </li> </ul> <em>Pulpits of the Lost Cause: The Faith and Politics of Former Confederate Chaplains during Reconstruction</em>. By Steve Longenecker. Religion and American Culture. (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2023. Pp. xiv, 257. $54.95, ISBN 978-0-8173-2149-9.) <p>Steve Longenecker, professor of history emeritus at Bridgewater College and author of various other books on religion in the Civil War era, has produced yet another excellent addition to the field. <em>Pulpits of the Lost Cause</em>: <em>The Faith and Politics of Former Confederate Chaplains during Reconstruction</em> takes a deep dive into ten white former Confederate chaplains, the deepest such study to date. Longenecker somewhat affirms yet complicates Charles Reagan Wilson’s assertion that former Confederate chaplains were “the ‘main celebrants’ of the Lost Cause” (p. 2). The text also recasts the Lost Cause as a remarkably malleable ideology open to varied interpretations.</p> <p>More generally, the book strikes a nuanced balance in the old debate between scholars stressing the South’s homogeneity or heterogeneity. Longenecker’s book affirms a well-known aspect of human nature, that people can hold strongly to contradictory beliefs and compartmentalize different parts of their lives. Refreshingly, Longenecker explicitly notes that his subjects’ lives were varied and fascinating, multilayered and multifaceted—an implicit reminder that history is best at its most human.</p> <p>Longenecker not only sheds light on an underexamined part of the scholarly conversation on Lost Cause religion but also tells the story in a manner both neatly organized and pleasantly flowing. The introduction displays the casual mastery of topic and writing of a senior scholar, covering in a few pages the origins and development of the Lost Cause as well as the book’s major points and structure. Chapter 1 covers the general experience of Confederate chaplains during the Civil War, while the subsequent chapters trace the careers of his case studies. Some, like Moses Drury Hoge, George Gilman Smith, and John L. Girardeau were conventionally conservative Lost Cause preachers who best fit Charles Reagan Wilson’s description. Others, such as Lachlan C. Vass and Randolph H. McKim, were compartmentalizers, sometimes promoting the Lost Cause and at other times focusing on their congregations. Atticus G. Haygood, who promoted the New South, was an outlier for his limited promotion of racial <strong>[End Page 442]</strong> equality. William Porcher DuBose read liberal theology, while bishop Charles T. Quintard was a theologically conservative institution-builder, yet both shared moderate stances on the Lost Cause and a connection to the University of the South at Sewanee, Tennessee. Meanwhile, at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, the theologically conservative John A. Broadus was close friends with his fellow former Confederate chaplain Crawford H. Toy until the latter turned to theological modernism, prompting Broadus to join a successful attempt to have Toy fired. The conclusion notes that, taken together, these stories show how former Confederate chaplains articulated a diverse range of perspectives on the New South, theology, and the promotion of the Lost Cause. At the same time, racism (partially excepting Haygood) and general support for the Lost Cause knit together former Confederate chaplains.</p> <p>The study is remarkable for its clarity. One particularly beneficial aspect of the text is Longenecker’s habit of immediately and concisely defining significant terms in parenthetical asides in the main text. He defines <em>conservative</em> on page two, <em>civil religion</em> on page four, and <em>theological modernism</em> on page five, and then provides a succinct explanation and then demolition of major Lost Cause arguments on pages six to eleven. While some history books exasperate nonspecialists by underexplaining jargon, Longenecker’s text reads clear as crystal. His prose is consistently pleasant to read and occasionally sparkles. At just over two hundred pages of main text, the book is also just the right length, and occasional pictures make a nice touch. While the book could benefit from more inclusion of women’s and nonwhite voices, the author’s focus on former Confederate chaplains seems to justify this limitation.</p> <p>I heartily recommend <em>Pulpits of the Lost Cause</em> to readers of all levels, from undergraduate students in courses on the Civil War...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":45484,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulpits of the Lost Cause: The Faith and Politics of Former Confederate Chaplains during Reconstruction by Steve Longenecker (review)\",\"authors\":\"Brendan J. J. Payne\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/soh.2024.a925473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Pulpits of the Lost Cause: The Faith and Politics of Former Confederate Chaplains during Reconstruction</em> by Steve Longenecker <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Brendan J. J. Payne </li> </ul> <em>Pulpits of the Lost Cause: The Faith and Politics of Former Confederate Chaplains during Reconstruction</em>. By Steve Longenecker. Religion and American Culture. (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2023. Pp. xiv, 257. $54.95, ISBN 978-0-8173-2149-9.) <p>Steve Longenecker, professor of history emeritus at Bridgewater College and author of various other books on religion in the Civil War era, has produced yet another excellent addition to the field. <em>Pulpits of the Lost Cause</em>: <em>The Faith and Politics of Former Confederate Chaplains during Reconstruction</em> takes a deep dive into ten white former Confederate chaplains, the deepest such study to date. Longenecker somewhat affirms yet complicates Charles Reagan Wilson’s assertion that former Confederate chaplains were “the ‘main celebrants’ of the Lost Cause” (p. 2). The text also recasts the Lost Cause as a remarkably malleable ideology open to varied interpretations.</p> <p>More generally, the book strikes a nuanced balance in the old debate between scholars stressing the South’s homogeneity or heterogeneity. Longenecker’s book affirms a well-known aspect of human nature, that people can hold strongly to contradictory beliefs and compartmentalize different parts of their lives. Refreshingly, Longenecker explicitly notes that his subjects’ lives were varied and fascinating, multilayered and multifaceted—an implicit reminder that history is best at its most human.</p> <p>Longenecker not only sheds light on an underexamined part of the scholarly conversation on Lost Cause religion but also tells the story in a manner both neatly organized and pleasantly flowing. The introduction displays the casual mastery of topic and writing of a senior scholar, covering in a few pages the origins and development of the Lost Cause as well as the book’s major points and structure. Chapter 1 covers the general experience of Confederate chaplains during the Civil War, while the subsequent chapters trace the careers of his case studies. Some, like Moses Drury Hoge, George Gilman Smith, and John L. Girardeau were conventionally conservative Lost Cause preachers who best fit Charles Reagan Wilson’s description. Others, such as Lachlan C. Vass and Randolph H. McKim, were compartmentalizers, sometimes promoting the Lost Cause and at other times focusing on their congregations. Atticus G. Haygood, who promoted the New South, was an outlier for his limited promotion of racial <strong>[End Page 442]</strong> equality. William Porcher DuBose read liberal theology, while bishop Charles T. Quintard was a theologically conservative institution-builder, yet both shared moderate stances on the Lost Cause and a connection to the University of the South at Sewanee, Tennessee. Meanwhile, at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, the theologically conservative John A. Broadus was close friends with his fellow former Confederate chaplain Crawford H. Toy until the latter turned to theological modernism, prompting Broadus to join a successful attempt to have Toy fired. The conclusion notes that, taken together, these stories show how former Confederate chaplains articulated a diverse range of perspectives on the New South, theology, and the promotion of the Lost Cause. At the same time, racism (partially excepting Haygood) and general support for the Lost Cause knit together former Confederate chaplains.</p> <p>The study is remarkable for its clarity. One particularly beneficial aspect of the text is Longenecker’s habit of immediately and concisely defining significant terms in parenthetical asides in the main text. He defines <em>conservative</em> on page two, <em>civil religion</em> on page four, and <em>theological modernism</em> on page five, and then provides a succinct explanation and then demolition of major Lost Cause arguments on pages six to eleven. While some history books exasperate nonspecialists by underexplaining jargon, Longenecker’s text reads clear as crystal. His prose is consistently pleasant to read and occasionally sparkles. At just over two hundred pages of main text, the book is also just the right length, and occasional pictures make a nice touch. While the book could benefit from more inclusion of women’s and nonwhite voices, the author’s focus on former Confederate chaplains seems to justify this limitation.</p> <p>I heartily recommend <em>Pulpits of the Lost Cause</em> to readers of all levels, from undergraduate students in courses on the Civil War...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a925473\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a925473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 失落事业的讲坛:失落事业的讲坛:重建期间前邦联牧师的信仰与政治》,史蒂夫-朗格纳克著,布伦丹-J-J-佩恩译:重建期间前邦联牧师的信仰与政治。作者:Steve Longenecker。宗教与美国文化》。(塔斯卡卢萨:阿拉巴马大学出版社,2023 年。第 xiv、257 页。54.95美元,ISBN 978-0-8173-2149-9)。Steve Longenecker 是布里奇沃特学院(Bridgewater College)的名誉历史教授,著有多部关于内战时期宗教的其他书籍。失落事业的讲坛》(Pulpits of the Lost Cause:重建期间前邦联牧师的信仰与政治》深入研究了十位白人前邦联牧师,是迄今为止最深入的此类研究。查尔斯-里根-威尔逊(Charles Reagan Wilson)曾断言,前邦联牧师是 "失落事业的'主要庆祝者'"(第 2 页),朗格纳克在某种程度上肯定了这一论断,但又将其复杂化。该书还将 "失去的事业 "重新塑造为一种极具延展性的意识形态,可接受各种不同的解释。更广泛地说,该书在学者们强调南方同质性或异质性的古老争论中取得了微妙的平衡。朗格纳克在书中肯定了人性中一个众所周知的方面,即人们会强烈坚持相互矛盾的信念,并将生活的不同部分分割开来。令人耳目一新的是,朗格纳克明确指出,他的研究对象的生活丰富多彩、引人入胜、多层次、多面性--这不言而喻地提醒我们,历史最能体现人性。朗格纳克不仅揭示了 "失落的事业 "宗教学术对话中未被充分研究的部分,还以条理清晰、行文流畅的方式讲述了这个故事。导言展现了一位资深学者对主题和写作的驾驭能力,用短短几页纸介绍了 "失落的事业 "的起源和发展,以及本书的要点和结构。第一章介绍了南北战争期间邦联牧师的一般经历,随后的章节则追溯了他的个案研究对象的职业生涯。其中一些人,如摩西-德鲁里-霍格(Moses Drury Hoge)、乔治-吉尔曼-史密斯(George Gilman Smith)和约翰-吉拉尔多(John L. Girardeau)是传统保守的 "失去的事业 "传教士,最符合查尔斯-里根-威尔逊的描述。其他传教士,如拉克伦-瓦斯(Lachlan C. Vass)和伦道夫-麦金(Randolph H. McKim),则是分门别类的传教士,他们有时宣传 "失落的事业",有时则专注于自己的教众。宣传新南方的阿提克斯-海古德(Atticus G. Haygood)是个异类,因为他对种族[第442页完]平等的宣传有限。威廉-波彻-杜博斯(William Porcher DuBose)读的是自由主义神学,而查尔斯-T-昆塔德(Charles T. Quintard)主教则是神学上保守的机构建设者,但两人对 "失落的事业 "都持温和立场,并与田纳西州西瓦尼的南方大学有联系。与此同时,在南方浸信会神学院,神学上保守的约翰-A-布罗德斯(John A. Broadus)与他的同僚、前邦联牧师克劳福德-H-托伊(Crawford H. Toy)是亲密的朋友,直到后者转向神学现代主义,促使布罗德斯加入到成功解雇托伊的尝试中。结论指出,综合来看,这些故事显示了前邦联牧师如何对新南方、神学和促进失落事业表达了不同的观点。同时,种族主义(海古德除外)和对 "失落的事业 "的普遍支持将前邦联牧师紧密地联系在一起。该研究因其清晰而引人注目。朗格纳克习惯于在正文的括号附注中对重要术语立即做出简明扼要的定义,这一点尤其有益。他在第二页给保守主义下了定义,在第四页给公民宗教下了定义,在第五页给神学现代主义下了定义,然后在第六页到第十一页对 "失落的事业 "的主要论点进行了简洁的解释和驳斥。有些历史书籍对专业术语解释不足,让非专业人士感到恼火,而朗格纳克的文字读起来却如水晶般清晰。他的散文始终读来悦耳动听,偶尔还闪烁着火花。这本书的正文只有两百多页,篇幅也恰到好处,偶尔还配有图片,令人赏心悦目。虽然该书可以更多地收录女性和非白人的声音,但作者对前邦联牧师的关注似乎证明了这一限制是合理的。我衷心地向各个层次的读者推荐《失落的事业的讲坛》,包括内战课程的本科生...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulpits of the Lost Cause: The Faith and Politics of Former Confederate Chaplains during Reconstruction by Steve Longenecker (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Pulpits of the Lost Cause: The Faith and Politics of Former Confederate Chaplains during Reconstruction by Steve Longenecker
  • Brendan J. J. Payne
Pulpits of the Lost Cause: The Faith and Politics of Former Confederate Chaplains during Reconstruction. By Steve Longenecker. Religion and American Culture. (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2023. Pp. xiv, 257. $54.95, ISBN 978-0-8173-2149-9.)

Steve Longenecker, professor of history emeritus at Bridgewater College and author of various other books on religion in the Civil War era, has produced yet another excellent addition to the field. Pulpits of the Lost Cause: The Faith and Politics of Former Confederate Chaplains during Reconstruction takes a deep dive into ten white former Confederate chaplains, the deepest such study to date. Longenecker somewhat affirms yet complicates Charles Reagan Wilson’s assertion that former Confederate chaplains were “the ‘main celebrants’ of the Lost Cause” (p. 2). The text also recasts the Lost Cause as a remarkably malleable ideology open to varied interpretations.

More generally, the book strikes a nuanced balance in the old debate between scholars stressing the South’s homogeneity or heterogeneity. Longenecker’s book affirms a well-known aspect of human nature, that people can hold strongly to contradictory beliefs and compartmentalize different parts of their lives. Refreshingly, Longenecker explicitly notes that his subjects’ lives were varied and fascinating, multilayered and multifaceted—an implicit reminder that history is best at its most human.

Longenecker not only sheds light on an underexamined part of the scholarly conversation on Lost Cause religion but also tells the story in a manner both neatly organized and pleasantly flowing. The introduction displays the casual mastery of topic and writing of a senior scholar, covering in a few pages the origins and development of the Lost Cause as well as the book’s major points and structure. Chapter 1 covers the general experience of Confederate chaplains during the Civil War, while the subsequent chapters trace the careers of his case studies. Some, like Moses Drury Hoge, George Gilman Smith, and John L. Girardeau were conventionally conservative Lost Cause preachers who best fit Charles Reagan Wilson’s description. Others, such as Lachlan C. Vass and Randolph H. McKim, were compartmentalizers, sometimes promoting the Lost Cause and at other times focusing on their congregations. Atticus G. Haygood, who promoted the New South, was an outlier for his limited promotion of racial [End Page 442] equality. William Porcher DuBose read liberal theology, while bishop Charles T. Quintard was a theologically conservative institution-builder, yet both shared moderate stances on the Lost Cause and a connection to the University of the South at Sewanee, Tennessee. Meanwhile, at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, the theologically conservative John A. Broadus was close friends with his fellow former Confederate chaplain Crawford H. Toy until the latter turned to theological modernism, prompting Broadus to join a successful attempt to have Toy fired. The conclusion notes that, taken together, these stories show how former Confederate chaplains articulated a diverse range of perspectives on the New South, theology, and the promotion of the Lost Cause. At the same time, racism (partially excepting Haygood) and general support for the Lost Cause knit together former Confederate chaplains.

The study is remarkable for its clarity. One particularly beneficial aspect of the text is Longenecker’s habit of immediately and concisely defining significant terms in parenthetical asides in the main text. He defines conservative on page two, civil religion on page four, and theological modernism on page five, and then provides a succinct explanation and then demolition of major Lost Cause arguments on pages six to eleven. While some history books exasperate nonspecialists by underexplaining jargon, Longenecker’s text reads clear as crystal. His prose is consistently pleasant to read and occasionally sparkles. At just over two hundred pages of main text, the book is also just the right length, and occasional pictures make a nice touch. While the book could benefit from more inclusion of women’s and nonwhite voices, the author’s focus on former Confederate chaplains seems to justify this limitation.

I heartily recommend Pulpits of the Lost Cause to readers of all levels, from undergraduate students in courses on the Civil War...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信