Advaita S Chaudhari, Jason R McFadden, Jessica Bentz, Rebecca H Evans, Maria A Selim, Aravindhan Sriharan
{"title":"分化型外阴上皮内瘤变的模仿者:不遵从苔癣硬结症治疗导致的反应性非典型增生。","authors":"Advaita S Chaudhari, Jason R McFadden, Jessica Bentz, Rebecca H Evans, Maria A Selim, Aravindhan Sriharan","doi":"10.1097/dad.0000000000002712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (d-VIN) is an HPV-independent precursor to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. The histology of d-VIN lesions is difficult to differentiate from that of non-neoplastic epithelial disorders, especially lichen sclerosus (LS). The authors present a case of LS, where relying on histopathology alone could have led to misdiagnosis. The patient was a 17-year-old female patient with clinical features of vulvar dermatitis and LS for 2 years. She was counseled to apply clobetasol 0.05% to the affected area daily but reported no improvement after 6 months. A biopsy of the right labia majora revealed histologic findings typical of d-VIN and near-contiguous p53 expression. These features are characteristic of d-VIN. However, d-VIN is exceedingly rare in young patients. The case was reviewed by 6 dermatopathologists and gynecologic pathologists, who observed that the degree of inflammation would be unusual postclobetasol therapy and could be due to noncompliance. A review of the patient's chart revealed that she \"does not always remember to apply\" clobetasol. The patient's clinician confirmed that there were compliance issues, and the follow-up biopsy was negative for d-VIN. The case was signed out as LS, with a note describing the above, and to rebiopsy if concern persisted. The authors conjecture that inflammatory infiltrates in the biopsied area caused reactive atypia due to lack of adherence to treatment. Although the patient's age helped rule out d-VIN, similar cases in elderly patients may be occurring. Pathologists must be aware that reactive forms of untreated LS can mimic d-VIN, to avoid misdiagnosis.","PeriodicalId":501833,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Dermatopathology","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Mimicker of Differentiated Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Reactive Atypia From Noncompliance With Lichen Sclerosus Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Advaita S Chaudhari, Jason R McFadden, Jessica Bentz, Rebecca H Evans, Maria A Selim, Aravindhan Sriharan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/dad.0000000000002712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (d-VIN) is an HPV-independent precursor to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. The histology of d-VIN lesions is difficult to differentiate from that of non-neoplastic epithelial disorders, especially lichen sclerosus (LS). The authors present a case of LS, where relying on histopathology alone could have led to misdiagnosis. The patient was a 17-year-old female patient with clinical features of vulvar dermatitis and LS for 2 years. She was counseled to apply clobetasol 0.05% to the affected area daily but reported no improvement after 6 months. A biopsy of the right labia majora revealed histologic findings typical of d-VIN and near-contiguous p53 expression. These features are characteristic of d-VIN. However, d-VIN is exceedingly rare in young patients. The case was reviewed by 6 dermatopathologists and gynecologic pathologists, who observed that the degree of inflammation would be unusual postclobetasol therapy and could be due to noncompliance. A review of the patient's chart revealed that she \\\"does not always remember to apply\\\" clobetasol. The patient's clinician confirmed that there were compliance issues, and the follow-up biopsy was negative for d-VIN. The case was signed out as LS, with a note describing the above, and to rebiopsy if concern persisted. The authors conjecture that inflammatory infiltrates in the biopsied area caused reactive atypia due to lack of adherence to treatment. Although the patient's age helped rule out d-VIN, similar cases in elderly patients may be occurring. Pathologists must be aware that reactive forms of untreated LS can mimic d-VIN, to avoid misdiagnosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Dermatopathology\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Dermatopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/dad.0000000000002712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Dermatopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/dad.0000000000002712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
分化型外阴上皮内瘤变(d-VIN)是一种与 HPV 无关的外阴鳞状细胞癌的前驱病变。d-VIN病变的组织学很难与非肿瘤性上皮病变,尤其是硬皮病(LS)区分开来。作者介绍了一例 LS 病例,仅依靠组织病理学可能会导致误诊。患者是一名 17 岁的女性,临床特征为外阴皮炎和 LS,已有两年之久。医生建议她每天在患处涂抹0.05%的氯倍他索,但6个月后仍不见好转。右侧大阴唇的活组织检查发现了典型的 d-VIN 组织学特征和近乎连续的 p53 表达。这些特征是 d-VIN 的特征。然而,d-VIN 在年轻患者中极为罕见。6 位皮肤病理学家和妇科病理学家对该病例进行了审查,他们认为炎症的程度在氯倍他索治疗后并不常见,可能是由于患者未遵医嘱所致。查看患者病历后发现,她 "并不总是记得使用 "氯倍他索。患者的临床医生证实她存在依从性问题,随访活检结果显示 d-VIN 阴性。该病例被签出为 LS 病例,并附注说明了上述情况,如果仍有疑虑,将重新活检。作者推测,活检区域的炎症浸润导致反应性非典型性,原因是患者没有坚持治疗。虽然患者的年龄有助于排除 d-VIN 的可能性,但老年患者中也可能出现类似病例。病理学家必须意识到,未经治疗的反应性 LS 可模拟 d-VIN,以避免误诊。
A Mimicker of Differentiated Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Reactive Atypia From Noncompliance With Lichen Sclerosus Therapy.
Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (d-VIN) is an HPV-independent precursor to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. The histology of d-VIN lesions is difficult to differentiate from that of non-neoplastic epithelial disorders, especially lichen sclerosus (LS). The authors present a case of LS, where relying on histopathology alone could have led to misdiagnosis. The patient was a 17-year-old female patient with clinical features of vulvar dermatitis and LS for 2 years. She was counseled to apply clobetasol 0.05% to the affected area daily but reported no improvement after 6 months. A biopsy of the right labia majora revealed histologic findings typical of d-VIN and near-contiguous p53 expression. These features are characteristic of d-VIN. However, d-VIN is exceedingly rare in young patients. The case was reviewed by 6 dermatopathologists and gynecologic pathologists, who observed that the degree of inflammation would be unusual postclobetasol therapy and could be due to noncompliance. A review of the patient's chart revealed that she "does not always remember to apply" clobetasol. The patient's clinician confirmed that there were compliance issues, and the follow-up biopsy was negative for d-VIN. The case was signed out as LS, with a note describing the above, and to rebiopsy if concern persisted. The authors conjecture that inflammatory infiltrates in the biopsied area caused reactive atypia due to lack of adherence to treatment. Although the patient's age helped rule out d-VIN, similar cases in elderly patients may be occurring. Pathologists must be aware that reactive forms of untreated LS can mimic d-VIN, to avoid misdiagnosis.