贝叶斯惩罚似然重建算法 Q.Clear(无 PSF 校正)在淀粉样蛋白 PET 图像中的模型和临床评估

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Kei Wagatsuma, Muneyuki Sakata, Kenta Miwa, Yumi Hamano, Hirofumi Kawakami, Yuto Kamitaka, Tensho Yamao, Noriaki Miyaji, Kenji Ishibashi, Tetsuro Tago, Jun Toyohara, Kenji Ishii
{"title":"贝叶斯惩罚似然重建算法 Q.Clear(无 PSF 校正)在淀粉样蛋白 PET 图像中的模型和临床评估","authors":"Kei Wagatsuma, Muneyuki Sakata, Kenta Miwa, Yumi Hamano, Hirofumi Kawakami, Yuto Kamitaka, Tensho Yamao, Noriaki Miyaji, Kenji Ishibashi, Tetsuro Tago, Jun Toyohara, Kenji Ishii","doi":"10.1186/s40658-024-00641-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bayesian penalised likelihood (BPL) reconstruction, which incorporates point-spread-function (PSF) correction, provides higher signal-to-noise ratios and more accurate quantitation than conventional ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction. However, applying PSF correction to brain PET imaging is controversial due to Gibbs artefacts that manifest as unpredicted cortical uptake enhancement. The present study aimed to validate whether BPL without PSF would be useful for amyloid PET imaging. Images were acquired from Hoffman 3D brain and cylindrical phantoms for phantom study and 71 patients administered with [18F]flutemetamol in clinical study using a Discovery MI. All images were reconstructed using OSEM, BPL with PSF correction, and BPL without PSF correction. Count profile, %contrast, recovery coefficients (RCs), and image noise were calculated from the images acquired from the phantoms. Amyloid β deposition in patients was visually assessed by two physicians and quantified based on the standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR). The overestimated radioactivity in profile curves was eliminated using BPL without PSF correction. The %contrast and image noise decreased with increasing β values in phantom images. Image quality and RCs were better using BPL with, than without PSF correction or OSEM. An optimal β value of 600 was determined for BPL without PSF correction. Visual evaluation almost agreed perfectly (κ = 0.91–0.97), without depending on reconstruction methods. Composite SUVRs did not significantly differ between reconstruction methods. Gibbs artefacts disappeared from phantom images using the BPL without PSF correction. Visual and quantitative evaluation of [18F]flutemetamol imaging was independent of the reconstruction method. The BPL without PSF correction could be the standard reconstruction method for amyloid PET imaging, despite being qualitatively inferior to BPL with PSF correction for [18F]flutemetamol amyloid PET imaging.","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phantom and clinical evaluation of the Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear without PSF correction in amyloid PET images\",\"authors\":\"Kei Wagatsuma, Muneyuki Sakata, Kenta Miwa, Yumi Hamano, Hirofumi Kawakami, Yuto Kamitaka, Tensho Yamao, Noriaki Miyaji, Kenji Ishibashi, Tetsuro Tago, Jun Toyohara, Kenji Ishii\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40658-024-00641-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bayesian penalised likelihood (BPL) reconstruction, which incorporates point-spread-function (PSF) correction, provides higher signal-to-noise ratios and more accurate quantitation than conventional ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction. However, applying PSF correction to brain PET imaging is controversial due to Gibbs artefacts that manifest as unpredicted cortical uptake enhancement. The present study aimed to validate whether BPL without PSF would be useful for amyloid PET imaging. Images were acquired from Hoffman 3D brain and cylindrical phantoms for phantom study and 71 patients administered with [18F]flutemetamol in clinical study using a Discovery MI. All images were reconstructed using OSEM, BPL with PSF correction, and BPL without PSF correction. Count profile, %contrast, recovery coefficients (RCs), and image noise were calculated from the images acquired from the phantoms. Amyloid β deposition in patients was visually assessed by two physicians and quantified based on the standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR). The overestimated radioactivity in profile curves was eliminated using BPL without PSF correction. The %contrast and image noise decreased with increasing β values in phantom images. Image quality and RCs were better using BPL with, than without PSF correction or OSEM. An optimal β value of 600 was determined for BPL without PSF correction. Visual evaluation almost agreed perfectly (κ = 0.91–0.97), without depending on reconstruction methods. Composite SUVRs did not significantly differ between reconstruction methods. Gibbs artefacts disappeared from phantom images using the BPL without PSF correction. Visual and quantitative evaluation of [18F]flutemetamol imaging was independent of the reconstruction method. The BPL without PSF correction could be the standard reconstruction method for amyloid PET imaging, despite being qualitatively inferior to BPL with PSF correction for [18F]flutemetamol amyloid PET imaging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00641-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00641-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

贝叶斯惩罚似然(BPL)重建结合了点扩散函数(PSF)校正,与传统的有序子集期望最大化(OSEM)重建相比,能提供更高的信噪比和更精确的定量。然而,由于吉布斯伪影(Gibbs artefacts)会表现为无法预测的皮层摄取增强,因此将 PSF 校正应用于脑 PET 成像还存在争议。本研究旨在验证无 PSF 的 BPL 是否适用于淀粉样蛋白 PET 成像。研究人员使用 Discovery MI 采集了霍夫曼三维大脑和圆柱模型的图像,并在临床研究中采集了 71 名患者的[18F]氟替美托。所有图像均使用 OSEM、带 PSF 校正的 BPL 和不带 PSF 校正的 BPL 进行重建。根据从模型获取的图像计算计数曲线、对比度%、恢复系数(RC)和图像噪声。患者的淀粉样β沉积由两名医生目测评估,并根据标准化摄取值比(SUVR)进行量化。使用不含 PSF 校正的 BPL 消除了轮廓曲线中被高估的放射性。随着模型图像中 β 值的增加,对比度百分比和图像噪声都有所下降。使用带 PSF 校正的 BPL 比不使用 PSF 校正或 OSEM 的图像质量和 RC 更好。不带 PSF 校正的 BPL 的最佳 β 值为 600。视觉评估几乎完全一致(κ = 0.91-0.97),而不取决于重建方法。不同重建方法的综合 SUVR 没有显著差异。使用不带 PSF 校正的 BPL 重建的模型图像中吉布斯伪影消失了。[18F]氟替美托成像的视觉和定量评估与重建方法无关。在[18F]氟替美托淀粉样蛋白 PET 成像中,不带 PSF 校正的 BPL 虽然在质量上不如带 PSF 校正的 BPL,但可以作为淀粉样蛋白 PET 成像的标准重建方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phantom and clinical evaluation of the Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear without PSF correction in amyloid PET images
Bayesian penalised likelihood (BPL) reconstruction, which incorporates point-spread-function (PSF) correction, provides higher signal-to-noise ratios and more accurate quantitation than conventional ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction. However, applying PSF correction to brain PET imaging is controversial due to Gibbs artefacts that manifest as unpredicted cortical uptake enhancement. The present study aimed to validate whether BPL without PSF would be useful for amyloid PET imaging. Images were acquired from Hoffman 3D brain and cylindrical phantoms for phantom study and 71 patients administered with [18F]flutemetamol in clinical study using a Discovery MI. All images were reconstructed using OSEM, BPL with PSF correction, and BPL without PSF correction. Count profile, %contrast, recovery coefficients (RCs), and image noise were calculated from the images acquired from the phantoms. Amyloid β deposition in patients was visually assessed by two physicians and quantified based on the standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR). The overestimated radioactivity in profile curves was eliminated using BPL without PSF correction. The %contrast and image noise decreased with increasing β values in phantom images. Image quality and RCs were better using BPL with, than without PSF correction or OSEM. An optimal β value of 600 was determined for BPL without PSF correction. Visual evaluation almost agreed perfectly (κ = 0.91–0.97), without depending on reconstruction methods. Composite SUVRs did not significantly differ between reconstruction methods. Gibbs artefacts disappeared from phantom images using the BPL without PSF correction. Visual and quantitative evaluation of [18F]flutemetamol imaging was independent of the reconstruction method. The BPL without PSF correction could be the standard reconstruction method for amyloid PET imaging, despite being qualitatively inferior to BPL with PSF correction for [18F]flutemetamol amyloid PET imaging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信