前密苏里时期的奴隶制、宗教和种族:凯文-D.-巴特勒(Kevin D. Butler)所著的《奴隶制的自由与罪恶的自由》(评论

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Kimberly Kellison
{"title":"前密苏里时期的奴隶制、宗教和种族:凯文-D.-巴特勒(Kevin D. Butler)所著的《奴隶制的自由与罪恶的自由》(评论","authors":"Kimberly Kellison","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a925459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri: Freedom from Slavery and Freedom from Sin</em> by Kevin D. Butler <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Kimberly Kellison </li> </ul> <em>Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri: Freedom from Slavery and Freedom from Sin</em>. By Kevin D. Butler. Religion in American History. (Lanham, Md., and other cities: Lexington Books, 2023. Pp. xiv, 175. $95.00, ISBN 978-1-66691-699-7.) <p><em>Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri: Freedom from Slavery and Freedom from Sin</em> offers an account of religion, race, and slavery in pre–Civil War Missouri, focusing primarily on the religious experiences of African Americans. Kevin D. Butler argues that three main forces influenced African American religion in Missouri: African folk religion, which relied heavily on conjure; the white southern church; and the white northern church. By the eve of the Civil War, African Americans had developed a version of Christianity that differed from both southern and northern white evangelicals’ faith and that served as the foundation for postwar African American denominationalism in the state.</p> <p>Butler’s study begins with a description of the impact of northern evangelicals in Missouri. Although some radical abolitionists preached in the state, the majority of northern missionaries were “antislavery moderates” who generally supported gradual emancipation and colonization efforts (p. 1). Because of their outspoken criticism of abolitionism, these antislavery ministers were able to preach to African Americans and to assist in the formation of African American congregations without significant interference from the proslavery majority.</p> <p>Like enslaved men and women in other southern states, African Americans in Missouri drew from traditional African as well as European Christian religious beliefs and practices, forming their own version of Christianity in the years before the Civil War. Using the testimonies and stories of enslaved Missourians, Butler shows the prevalence of conjure and other African spiritual practices among enslaved communities and contends that African American men and women with conjure powers often exerted authority and influence.</p> <p>While African Americans drew on traditional African beliefs to frame religious and cultural beliefs, many were also deeply influenced by Christian concepts. Referencing the argument made by some historians that Christianity had only a marginal impact on the enslaved, Butler sides firmly with scholars who contend that Christianity played a prevalent role in the lives of most enslaved men and women. By the eve of the Civil War, Butler asserts, “any African American in the state . . . would have had some awareness of the basic aspects of Christianity” (p. 86). The spread of Christianity to the Black community came largely from the growth and establishment of biracial, white-controlled churches. Through these churches, white proslavery Missourians preached that slavery was divinely ordained and engaged in practices that enshrined the political power of the enslaver over the enslaved. While white-controlled proslavery churches “succeeded in promoting the spread of Christian concepts in the slave community,” white Missourians “failed to create a biracial community where bond men and women equated the interests of the slaveholding class with their own interest” (p. 79). Instead, African Americans embraced only certain aspects of Christianity, dismissing the pro-slavery message taught to them by white Missourians.</p> <p>The book’s final chapters focus on independent African American urban congregations. Butler examines the leadership of African American ministers <strong>[End Page 424]</strong> and shows the important religious as well as educational impact of independent Black congregations in the prewar years. During and after the Civil War, African Americans laid claim to a more complete form of religious freedom. By leaving white-controlled congregations and by forming additional independent churches, African Americans created a stronger denominational network in the state. In the postwar years, Butler argues, “the African American Christianity that had helped to sustain” enslaved men and women during slavery “began to emerge as the most significant and widespread institution in African American life” (pp. 151–52).</p> <p><em>Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri</em> is well crafted and well researched. Butler engages in historiographical debates throughout his study, although he might have elaborated in more detail about the state’s religious distinctiveness (or perhaps lack of distinctiveness) compared with other slaveholding states. Overall, however, the work is a welcome addition to the field and will serve as an important...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":45484,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri: Freedom from Slavery and Freedom from Sin by Kevin D. Butler (review)\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly Kellison\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/soh.2024.a925459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri: Freedom from Slavery and Freedom from Sin</em> by Kevin D. Butler <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Kimberly Kellison </li> </ul> <em>Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri: Freedom from Slavery and Freedom from Sin</em>. By Kevin D. Butler. Religion in American History. (Lanham, Md., and other cities: Lexington Books, 2023. Pp. xiv, 175. $95.00, ISBN 978-1-66691-699-7.) <p><em>Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri: Freedom from Slavery and Freedom from Sin</em> offers an account of religion, race, and slavery in pre–Civil War Missouri, focusing primarily on the religious experiences of African Americans. Kevin D. Butler argues that three main forces influenced African American religion in Missouri: African folk religion, which relied heavily on conjure; the white southern church; and the white northern church. By the eve of the Civil War, African Americans had developed a version of Christianity that differed from both southern and northern white evangelicals’ faith and that served as the foundation for postwar African American denominationalism in the state.</p> <p>Butler’s study begins with a description of the impact of northern evangelicals in Missouri. Although some radical abolitionists preached in the state, the majority of northern missionaries were “antislavery moderates” who generally supported gradual emancipation and colonization efforts (p. 1). Because of their outspoken criticism of abolitionism, these antislavery ministers were able to preach to African Americans and to assist in the formation of African American congregations without significant interference from the proslavery majority.</p> <p>Like enslaved men and women in other southern states, African Americans in Missouri drew from traditional African as well as European Christian religious beliefs and practices, forming their own version of Christianity in the years before the Civil War. Using the testimonies and stories of enslaved Missourians, Butler shows the prevalence of conjure and other African spiritual practices among enslaved communities and contends that African American men and women with conjure powers often exerted authority and influence.</p> <p>While African Americans drew on traditional African beliefs to frame religious and cultural beliefs, many were also deeply influenced by Christian concepts. Referencing the argument made by some historians that Christianity had only a marginal impact on the enslaved, Butler sides firmly with scholars who contend that Christianity played a prevalent role in the lives of most enslaved men and women. By the eve of the Civil War, Butler asserts, “any African American in the state . . . would have had some awareness of the basic aspects of Christianity” (p. 86). The spread of Christianity to the Black community came largely from the growth and establishment of biracial, white-controlled churches. Through these churches, white proslavery Missourians preached that slavery was divinely ordained and engaged in practices that enshrined the political power of the enslaver over the enslaved. While white-controlled proslavery churches “succeeded in promoting the spread of Christian concepts in the slave community,” white Missourians “failed to create a biracial community where bond men and women equated the interests of the slaveholding class with their own interest” (p. 79). Instead, African Americans embraced only certain aspects of Christianity, dismissing the pro-slavery message taught to them by white Missourians.</p> <p>The book’s final chapters focus on independent African American urban congregations. Butler examines the leadership of African American ministers <strong>[End Page 424]</strong> and shows the important religious as well as educational impact of independent Black congregations in the prewar years. During and after the Civil War, African Americans laid claim to a more complete form of religious freedom. By leaving white-controlled congregations and by forming additional independent churches, African Americans created a stronger denominational network in the state. In the postwar years, Butler argues, “the African American Christianity that had helped to sustain” enslaved men and women during slavery “began to emerge as the most significant and widespread institution in African American life” (pp. 151–52).</p> <p><em>Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri</em> is well crafted and well researched. Butler engages in historiographical debates throughout his study, although he might have elaborated in more detail about the state’s religious distinctiveness (or perhaps lack of distinctiveness) compared with other slaveholding states. Overall, however, the work is a welcome addition to the field and will serve as an important...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a925459\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a925459","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 前密苏里时期的奴隶制、宗教和种族:凯文-D.-巴特勒(Kevin D. Butler)著,金伯利-凯利森(Kimberly Kellison)译:摆脱奴隶制和摆脱罪恶。作者:凯文-D-巴特勒。美国历史中的宗教》。(马里兰州兰哈姆及其他城市:莱克星顿图书公司,2023 年。第 xiv、175 页。95.00美元,ISBN 978-1-66691-699-7)。前美国密苏里州的奴隶制、宗教与种族》(Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri:免于奴役和免于罪恶》介绍了内战前密苏里州的宗教、种族和奴隶制,主要侧重于非裔美国人的宗教经历。凯文-D-巴特勒(Kevin D. Butler)认为,有三种主要力量影响着密苏里州的非裔美国人宗教:非洲民间宗教(主要依赖巫术)、南方白人教会和北方白人教会。到南北战争前夕,非裔美国人发展出了一种不同于南方和北方白人福音派信仰的基督教,并成为战后该州非裔美国人教派的基础。巴特勒的研究首先描述了北方福音派在密苏里州的影响。虽然有些激进的废奴主义者在该州传教,但大多数北方传教士都是 "反奴隶制的温和派",他们一般都支持逐步解放和殖民化的努力(第 1 页)。由于他们直言不讳地批评废奴主义,这些反奴隶制的牧师能够向非裔美国人布道,并协助组建非裔美国人会众,而不会受到支持奴隶制的大多数人的严重干扰。与南部其他州的被奴役男女一样,密苏里州的非裔美国人从传统的非洲及欧洲基督教信仰和习俗中汲取营养,在南北战争前的岁月里形成了他们自己的基督教。巴特勒通过受奴役的密苏里人的证词和故事,展示了在受奴役的社区中巫术和其他非洲精神习俗的盛行,并认为拥有巫术能力的非裔美国人往往具有权威和影响力。虽然非裔美国人借鉴传统非洲信仰来构建宗教和文化信仰,但许多人也深受基督教观念的影响。一些历史学家认为基督教对被奴役者的影响微乎其微,巴特勒坚定地站在学者一边,认为基督教在大多数被奴役男女的生活中发挥了普遍作用。巴特勒断言,到南北战争前夕,"该州的任何非洲裔美国人......都会对基督教的基本内容有所了解"(第 86 页)。基督教在黑人社区的传播主要来自于由白人控制的双种族教会的发展和建立。通过这些教堂,支持奴隶制的密苏里白人宣扬奴隶制是上天注定的,他们的所作所为体现了奴役者对被奴役者的政治权力。虽然白人控制的支持奴隶制的教会 "成功地促进了基督教观念在奴隶社区的传播",但密苏里白人 "未能建立一个两族社区,在这个社区中,男女结合者将奴隶主阶级的利益等同于他们自己的利益"(第 79 页)。相反,非裔美国人只接受了基督教的某些方面,对密苏里白人传授给他们的支持奴隶制的信息不屑一顾。本书的最后几章重点介绍了独立的非裔美国人城市教会。巴特勒考察了非裔美国牧师的领导能力 [第 424 页末],并展示了战前独立黑人教会在宗教和教育方面的重要影响。内战期间和战后,非裔美国人获得了更全面的宗教自由。非裔美国人离开白人控制的教会,成立了更多的独立教会,从而在该州建立了一个更强大的教派网络。巴特勒认为,在战后的岁月里,"曾在奴隶制时期帮助维持 "被奴役男女的 "非裔美国人基督教""开始成为非裔美国人生活中最重要、最普遍的机构"(第 151-52 页)。前密苏里时期的奴隶制、宗教和种族》一书撰写精良,研究透彻。巴特勒在整个研究过程中参与了史学争论,尽管他本可以更详细地阐述密苏里州与其他奴隶制州相比在宗教方面的独特性(或者说缺乏独特性)。不过,总的来说,这部著作是该领域的一个值得欢迎的新成员,并将成为该领域的一部重要著作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri: Freedom from Slavery and Freedom from Sin by Kevin D. Butler (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri: Freedom from Slavery and Freedom from Sin by Kevin D. Butler
  • Kimberly Kellison
Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri: Freedom from Slavery and Freedom from Sin. By Kevin D. Butler. Religion in American History. (Lanham, Md., and other cities: Lexington Books, 2023. Pp. xiv, 175. $95.00, ISBN 978-1-66691-699-7.)

Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri: Freedom from Slavery and Freedom from Sin offers an account of religion, race, and slavery in pre–Civil War Missouri, focusing primarily on the religious experiences of African Americans. Kevin D. Butler argues that three main forces influenced African American religion in Missouri: African folk religion, which relied heavily on conjure; the white southern church; and the white northern church. By the eve of the Civil War, African Americans had developed a version of Christianity that differed from both southern and northern white evangelicals’ faith and that served as the foundation for postwar African American denominationalism in the state.

Butler’s study begins with a description of the impact of northern evangelicals in Missouri. Although some radical abolitionists preached in the state, the majority of northern missionaries were “antislavery moderates” who generally supported gradual emancipation and colonization efforts (p. 1). Because of their outspoken criticism of abolitionism, these antislavery ministers were able to preach to African Americans and to assist in the formation of African American congregations without significant interference from the proslavery majority.

Like enslaved men and women in other southern states, African Americans in Missouri drew from traditional African as well as European Christian religious beliefs and practices, forming their own version of Christianity in the years before the Civil War. Using the testimonies and stories of enslaved Missourians, Butler shows the prevalence of conjure and other African spiritual practices among enslaved communities and contends that African American men and women with conjure powers often exerted authority and influence.

While African Americans drew on traditional African beliefs to frame religious and cultural beliefs, many were also deeply influenced by Christian concepts. Referencing the argument made by some historians that Christianity had only a marginal impact on the enslaved, Butler sides firmly with scholars who contend that Christianity played a prevalent role in the lives of most enslaved men and women. By the eve of the Civil War, Butler asserts, “any African American in the state . . . would have had some awareness of the basic aspects of Christianity” (p. 86). The spread of Christianity to the Black community came largely from the growth and establishment of biracial, white-controlled churches. Through these churches, white proslavery Missourians preached that slavery was divinely ordained and engaged in practices that enshrined the political power of the enslaver over the enslaved. While white-controlled proslavery churches “succeeded in promoting the spread of Christian concepts in the slave community,” white Missourians “failed to create a biracial community where bond men and women equated the interests of the slaveholding class with their own interest” (p. 79). Instead, African Americans embraced only certain aspects of Christianity, dismissing the pro-slavery message taught to them by white Missourians.

The book’s final chapters focus on independent African American urban congregations. Butler examines the leadership of African American ministers [End Page 424] and shows the important religious as well as educational impact of independent Black congregations in the prewar years. During and after the Civil War, African Americans laid claim to a more complete form of religious freedom. By leaving white-controlled congregations and by forming additional independent churches, African Americans created a stronger denominational network in the state. In the postwar years, Butler argues, “the African American Christianity that had helped to sustain” enslaved men and women during slavery “began to emerge as the most significant and widespread institution in African American life” (pp. 151–52).

Slavery, Religion, and Race in Antebellum Missouri is well crafted and well researched. Butler engages in historiographical debates throughout his study, although he might have elaborated in more detail about the state’s religious distinctiveness (or perhaps lack of distinctiveness) compared with other slaveholding states. Overall, however, the work is a welcome addition to the field and will serve as an important...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信