夏洛特-本特利(Charlotte Bentley)所著的《新奥尔良与跨大西洋歌剧的诞生,1819-1859 年》(评论

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Christopher Lynch
{"title":"夏洛特-本特利(Charlotte Bentley)所著的《新奥尔良与跨大西洋歌剧的诞生,1819-1859 年》(评论","authors":"Christopher Lynch","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a925461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819–1859</em> by Charlotte Bentley <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Christopher Lynch </li> </ul> <em>New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819–1859</em>. By Charlotte Bentley. Opera Lab: Explorations in History, Technology, and Performance. (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2022. Pp. [viii], 256. $55.00, ISBN 978-0-226-82308-9.) <p>The exponential growth that accompanied the transformation of New Orleans from a French outpost to a major U.S. center of commerce and culture in the nineteenth century was punctuated by disease outbreaks, social upheavals, war, economic crises, and challenges to Francophone hegemony. Focusing on this period of opportunity and precarity, Charlotte Bentley’s <em>New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819–1859</em> probes residents’ and visitors’ understandings of themselves and their constructions of the world by examining their encounters with European opera.</p> <p>Chapter 1 analyzes the management of the Théâtre d’Orléans, uncovering a fascinating bilateral relationship between New Orleans and Paris. In some respects, the Théâtre d’Orléans resembled France’s provincial theaters, which similarly drew repertoire and performers from the French capital. Bentley delves into the managers’ journeys to Paris to consult with theatrical agents and operatic <strong>[End Page 426]</strong> trendsetters on production techniques and performer recruitment. But without the government subsidies enjoyed by French theaters, the Théâtre d’Orléans often ran at a loss, staying open because of its role in generating business for the adjoining ballroom, gambling house, and café. In chapter 2, Bentley places the New Orleans Francophone community’s allegiance to French culture in relief against its Anglophone counterpart. The French theater replicated Parisian opera productions more closely than did its primary competitor, the American Theatre, which favored substantial changes. As Francophone and Anglophone critics increasingly abandoned judging the execution of a performance in favor of assessing operas as works of art, Anglophone writers decentered France, and Francophone writers articulated Francocentric views.</p> <p>In the third chapter, Bentley’s refreshing conception of the audience includes not only the racially diverse ticket-buyers but also the many enslaved and free people who “heard and caught glimpses of productions from spaces other than the auditorium, as they worked in the corridors, foyers, loges, and on the doors during performances and rehearsal periods” (p. 83). Bentley also contrasts the often small opera audience with the much larger opera “public,” which emerged from discussions of opera that exceeded the theater’s walls (p. 80). In 1843, for example, the local magazine <em>La Lorgnette</em> engaged a foreign correspondent to write original reports on the Parisian theater scene. “The purpose,” Bentley observes, “was to create a sense that the opera-focused press in New Orleans was an independent equal of Paris and did not need to rely on reprinting secondhand news” (p. 101). In such ways, public discussions of opera “helped weave the city’s intricate sociocultural fabric” (p. 102).</p> <p>Bentley’s focus on material culture in chapters 4 and 5 illuminates “new social and cultural roles for opera both within and beyond the opera house” (p. 105). Sheet music arrangements of opera melodies enabled the performance of operatic music in the ballroom and home, contributing to the formation of a relationship between the theater and these spaces and creating a sense of “global intimacy” in which everyday experiences of consumers were linked to European practices and to exotic locales and characters (chap. 4). Souvenir sheet music and libretti contributed to canon formation in New Orleans in that they memorialized works that many were beginning to position as worthy of immortalization. In the final chapter, Bentley interrogates references to New Orleans opera in the writings of nonresidents. In the Frenchman Charles Jobey’s fiction, opera enables critiques of Creoles and French society. In contrast, New Englander Edward H. Durell described an evening at the New Orleans opera that opened him up to fashionable European notions of music as the highest of all the arts.</p> <p>Throughout the book, Bentley draws on a tremendous array of primary sources. Unlike many books by musicologists, hers does not rely on excerpts from musical scores or technical musical jargon. Her focus is less on traditional concerns of musicology—“great” works, performance...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":45484,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819–1859 by Charlotte Bentley (review)\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Lynch\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/soh.2024.a925461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819–1859</em> by Charlotte Bentley <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Christopher Lynch </li> </ul> <em>New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819–1859</em>. By Charlotte Bentley. Opera Lab: Explorations in History, Technology, and Performance. (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2022. Pp. [viii], 256. $55.00, ISBN 978-0-226-82308-9.) <p>The exponential growth that accompanied the transformation of New Orleans from a French outpost to a major U.S. center of commerce and culture in the nineteenth century was punctuated by disease outbreaks, social upheavals, war, economic crises, and challenges to Francophone hegemony. Focusing on this period of opportunity and precarity, Charlotte Bentley’s <em>New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819–1859</em> probes residents’ and visitors’ understandings of themselves and their constructions of the world by examining their encounters with European opera.</p> <p>Chapter 1 analyzes the management of the Théâtre d’Orléans, uncovering a fascinating bilateral relationship between New Orleans and Paris. In some respects, the Théâtre d’Orléans resembled France’s provincial theaters, which similarly drew repertoire and performers from the French capital. Bentley delves into the managers’ journeys to Paris to consult with theatrical agents and operatic <strong>[End Page 426]</strong> trendsetters on production techniques and performer recruitment. But without the government subsidies enjoyed by French theaters, the Théâtre d’Orléans often ran at a loss, staying open because of its role in generating business for the adjoining ballroom, gambling house, and café. In chapter 2, Bentley places the New Orleans Francophone community’s allegiance to French culture in relief against its Anglophone counterpart. The French theater replicated Parisian opera productions more closely than did its primary competitor, the American Theatre, which favored substantial changes. As Francophone and Anglophone critics increasingly abandoned judging the execution of a performance in favor of assessing operas as works of art, Anglophone writers decentered France, and Francophone writers articulated Francocentric views.</p> <p>In the third chapter, Bentley’s refreshing conception of the audience includes not only the racially diverse ticket-buyers but also the many enslaved and free people who “heard and caught glimpses of productions from spaces other than the auditorium, as they worked in the corridors, foyers, loges, and on the doors during performances and rehearsal periods” (p. 83). Bentley also contrasts the often small opera audience with the much larger opera “public,” which emerged from discussions of opera that exceeded the theater’s walls (p. 80). In 1843, for example, the local magazine <em>La Lorgnette</em> engaged a foreign correspondent to write original reports on the Parisian theater scene. “The purpose,” Bentley observes, “was to create a sense that the opera-focused press in New Orleans was an independent equal of Paris and did not need to rely on reprinting secondhand news” (p. 101). In such ways, public discussions of opera “helped weave the city’s intricate sociocultural fabric” (p. 102).</p> <p>Bentley’s focus on material culture in chapters 4 and 5 illuminates “new social and cultural roles for opera both within and beyond the opera house” (p. 105). Sheet music arrangements of opera melodies enabled the performance of operatic music in the ballroom and home, contributing to the formation of a relationship between the theater and these spaces and creating a sense of “global intimacy” in which everyday experiences of consumers were linked to European practices and to exotic locales and characters (chap. 4). Souvenir sheet music and libretti contributed to canon formation in New Orleans in that they memorialized works that many were beginning to position as worthy of immortalization. In the final chapter, Bentley interrogates references to New Orleans opera in the writings of nonresidents. In the Frenchman Charles Jobey’s fiction, opera enables critiques of Creoles and French society. In contrast, New Englander Edward H. Durell described an evening at the New Orleans opera that opened him up to fashionable European notions of music as the highest of all the arts.</p> <p>Throughout the book, Bentley draws on a tremendous array of primary sources. Unlike many books by musicologists, hers does not rely on excerpts from musical scores or technical musical jargon. Her focus is less on traditional concerns of musicology—“great” works, performance...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a925461\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a925461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者:Charlotte Bentley Christopher Lynch New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819-1859 by Charlotte Bentley Christopher Lynch New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819-1859.夏洛特-本特利著。歌剧实验室:历史、技术和表演探索。(芝加哥和伦敦:芝加哥大学出版社,2022 年。页码[viii], 256.55.00美元,ISBN 978-0-226-82308-9)。19 世纪,伴随着新奥尔良从法国前哨到美国主要商业和文化中心的飞速发展,疾病爆发、社会动荡、战争、经济危机以及对法语霸权的挑战也时有发生。夏洛特-本特利(Charlotte Bentley)的《新奥尔良和跨大西洋歌剧的创造,1819-1859 年》聚焦于这一充满机遇和不稳定的时期,通过研究居民和游客与欧洲歌剧的接触,探究了他们对自身的理解和对世界的建构。第一章分析了奥尔良剧院的管理,揭示了新奥尔良与巴黎之间引人入胜的双边关系。在某些方面,奥尔良剧院类似于法国的外省剧院,同样从法国首都吸引剧目和演员。本特利(Bentley)深入研究了经理们前往巴黎向戏剧经纪人和歌剧 [第426页完] 领潮人咨询制作技术和演员招募事宜的过程。但由于没有法国剧院所享有的政府补贴,奥尔良剧院经常处于亏损状态,它之所以能够继续营业,是因为它为毗邻的舞厅、赌场和咖啡馆带来了生意。在第 2 章中,本特利将新奥尔良法语社区对法国文化的忠诚与英语社区对法国文化的忠诚进行了对比。与主要竞争对手美国剧院相比,法国剧院更接近于复制巴黎歌剧制作,而美国剧院则倾向于进行实质性的改变。随着法语和英语评论家越来越多地放弃对表演的评判,转而将歌剧作为艺术作品来评估,英语作家不再以法国为中心,而法语作家则阐述了以法语为中心的观点。在第三章中,本特利对观众的概念令人耳目一新,不仅包括不同种族的购票者,还包括许多受奴役者和自由人,他们 "在演出和排练期间,在走廊、门厅、大厅和门上工作,从观众席以外的空间听到或瞥见演出"(第 83 页)。本特利还将通常人数较少的歌剧观众与人数更多的歌剧 "公众 "进行了对比,后者是在对歌剧的讨论中超越剧院围墙而产生的(第 80 页)。例如,1843 年,当地杂志《La Lorgnette》聘请一名外国记者撰写有关巴黎剧院场景的原创报道。"本特利认为,"这样做的目的是为了让人们感觉到,新奥尔良以歌剧为重点的媒体是独立于巴黎的,不需要依靠转载二手新闻"(第 101 页)。通过这种方式,关于歌剧的公开讨论 "帮助编织了这座城市错综复杂的社会文化结构"(第 102 页)。本特利在第 4 章和第 5 章中对物质文化的关注揭示了 "歌剧在歌剧院内外所扮演的新的社会和文化角色"(第 105 页)。歌剧旋律的乐谱编排使歌剧音乐得以在舞厅和家中演出,促进了剧院与这些空间之间关系的形成,并创造了一种 "全球亲密感",在这种亲密感中,消费者的日常体验与欧洲习俗以及异域风情和人物联系在一起(第 4 章)。纪念乐谱和歌词有助于新奥尔良的经典形成,因为它们纪念了许多人开始认为值得永垂不朽的作品。在最后一章,本特利分析了非新奥尔良人著作中对新奥尔良歌剧的引用。在法国人查尔斯-乔贝(Charles Jobey)的小说中,歌剧使人们得以对克里奥尔人和法国社会进行批判。与此相反,新英格兰人爱德华-H-杜雷尔(Edward H. Durell)则描述了在新奥尔良歌剧院度过的一个夜晚,这个夜晚让他了解到欧洲的时尚观念,即音乐是所有艺术中的最高境界。在整本书中,本特利利用了大量的原始资料。与许多音乐学家的著作不同,她的著作并不依赖于乐谱摘录或音乐专业术语。她的重点并不在于音乐学的传统关注点--"伟大 "的作品、表演和音乐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819–1859 by Charlotte Bentley (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819–1859 by Charlotte Bentley
  • Christopher Lynch
New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819–1859. By Charlotte Bentley. Opera Lab: Explorations in History, Technology, and Performance. (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2022. Pp. [viii], 256. $55.00, ISBN 978-0-226-82308-9.)

The exponential growth that accompanied the transformation of New Orleans from a French outpost to a major U.S. center of commerce and culture in the nineteenth century was punctuated by disease outbreaks, social upheavals, war, economic crises, and challenges to Francophone hegemony. Focusing on this period of opportunity and precarity, Charlotte Bentley’s New Orleans and the Creation of Transatlantic Opera, 1819–1859 probes residents’ and visitors’ understandings of themselves and their constructions of the world by examining their encounters with European opera.

Chapter 1 analyzes the management of the Théâtre d’Orléans, uncovering a fascinating bilateral relationship between New Orleans and Paris. In some respects, the Théâtre d’Orléans resembled France’s provincial theaters, which similarly drew repertoire and performers from the French capital. Bentley delves into the managers’ journeys to Paris to consult with theatrical agents and operatic [End Page 426] trendsetters on production techniques and performer recruitment. But without the government subsidies enjoyed by French theaters, the Théâtre d’Orléans often ran at a loss, staying open because of its role in generating business for the adjoining ballroom, gambling house, and café. In chapter 2, Bentley places the New Orleans Francophone community’s allegiance to French culture in relief against its Anglophone counterpart. The French theater replicated Parisian opera productions more closely than did its primary competitor, the American Theatre, which favored substantial changes. As Francophone and Anglophone critics increasingly abandoned judging the execution of a performance in favor of assessing operas as works of art, Anglophone writers decentered France, and Francophone writers articulated Francocentric views.

In the third chapter, Bentley’s refreshing conception of the audience includes not only the racially diverse ticket-buyers but also the many enslaved and free people who “heard and caught glimpses of productions from spaces other than the auditorium, as they worked in the corridors, foyers, loges, and on the doors during performances and rehearsal periods” (p. 83). Bentley also contrasts the often small opera audience with the much larger opera “public,” which emerged from discussions of opera that exceeded the theater’s walls (p. 80). In 1843, for example, the local magazine La Lorgnette engaged a foreign correspondent to write original reports on the Parisian theater scene. “The purpose,” Bentley observes, “was to create a sense that the opera-focused press in New Orleans was an independent equal of Paris and did not need to rely on reprinting secondhand news” (p. 101). In such ways, public discussions of opera “helped weave the city’s intricate sociocultural fabric” (p. 102).

Bentley’s focus on material culture in chapters 4 and 5 illuminates “new social and cultural roles for opera both within and beyond the opera house” (p. 105). Sheet music arrangements of opera melodies enabled the performance of operatic music in the ballroom and home, contributing to the formation of a relationship between the theater and these spaces and creating a sense of “global intimacy” in which everyday experiences of consumers were linked to European practices and to exotic locales and characters (chap. 4). Souvenir sheet music and libretti contributed to canon formation in New Orleans in that they memorialized works that many were beginning to position as worthy of immortalization. In the final chapter, Bentley interrogates references to New Orleans opera in the writings of nonresidents. In the Frenchman Charles Jobey’s fiction, opera enables critiques of Creoles and French society. In contrast, New Englander Edward H. Durell described an evening at the New Orleans opera that opened him up to fashionable European notions of music as the highest of all the arts.

Throughout the book, Bentley draws on a tremendous array of primary sources. Unlike many books by musicologists, hers does not rely on excerpts from musical scores or technical musical jargon. Her focus is less on traditional concerns of musicology—“great” works, performance...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信