Alexander B Stone, Andrés Zorrilla Vaca, Philipp Lirk, Philipp Gerner, Kamen Vlassakov
{"title":"以周围神经阻滞为主要麻醉方式时,麻醉开始时间记录的准确性","authors":"Alexander B Stone, Andrés Zorrilla Vaca, Philipp Lirk, Philipp Gerner, Kamen Vlassakov","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction When used as the primary anesthetic, nerve blocks are not billed as separate procedures. In this scenario, the anesthesia start (A Start ) time should include the block procedural time. We measured how often A Start time was documented before the nerve block was placed in the preoperative area, and compared cases where a block team performed the nerve block and cases where the intraoperative anesthesia attending supervised the nerve block. We hypothesized that the involvement of a regional anesthesia team would lead to more accurate documentation of A Start . We also estimated the lost revenue due to inaccurate start time documentation. Methods The study population were patients undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block as the primary anesthetic. For this analysis, A Start occurring less than 10 min before the in-operating room time was defined as potentially inaccurate. Lost potential revenue was estimated by taking the difference between the documented time of local anesthetic administration and the documented A Start time. Results A total of 745 cases were analyzed. Overall, 439 cases (58%) cases were identified as having potentially inaccurate start times. There were higher rates of inaccurate A Start documentation by the block team (316/482, 65.5%) compared with blocks supervised by the in-room anesthesia attendings (123/263, 46.7%, p<0.001). Overall, the estimated loss in billable revenue during the study period was a total of $70 265. Conclusions The performance of primary regional anesthesia procedure by a block team increased the incidence of inaccurate documentation and uncaptured potential revenue. There is need for education about accurate nerve block documentation for anesthesiologists, especially when separate teams are used. No data are available.","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anesthesia start time documentation accuracy where peripheral nerve block is the primary anesthetic\",\"authors\":\"Alexander B Stone, Andrés Zorrilla Vaca, Philipp Lirk, Philipp Gerner, Kamen Vlassakov\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction When used as the primary anesthetic, nerve blocks are not billed as separate procedures. In this scenario, the anesthesia start (A Start ) time should include the block procedural time. We measured how often A Start time was documented before the nerve block was placed in the preoperative area, and compared cases where a block team performed the nerve block and cases where the intraoperative anesthesia attending supervised the nerve block. We hypothesized that the involvement of a regional anesthesia team would lead to more accurate documentation of A Start . We also estimated the lost revenue due to inaccurate start time documentation. Methods The study population were patients undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block as the primary anesthetic. For this analysis, A Start occurring less than 10 min before the in-operating room time was defined as potentially inaccurate. Lost potential revenue was estimated by taking the difference between the documented time of local anesthetic administration and the documented A Start time. Results A total of 745 cases were analyzed. Overall, 439 cases (58%) cases were identified as having potentially inaccurate start times. There were higher rates of inaccurate A Start documentation by the block team (316/482, 65.5%) compared with blocks supervised by the in-room anesthesia attendings (123/263, 46.7%, p<0.001). Overall, the estimated loss in billable revenue during the study period was a total of $70 265. Conclusions The performance of primary regional anesthesia procedure by a block team increased the incidence of inaccurate documentation and uncaptured potential revenue. There is need for education about accurate nerve block documentation for anesthesiologists, especially when separate teams are used. No data are available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:神经阻滞作为主要麻醉手段使用时,不作为单独程序计费。在这种情况下,麻醉开始(A Start)时间应包括阻滞程序时间。我们测量了在术前区域进行神经阻滞前记录 "A 开始 "时间的频率,并比较了由阻滞小组实施神经阻滞的病例和由术中麻醉主治医师监督神经阻滞的病例。我们假设,区域麻醉团队的参与将使 "开始时间 "的记录更加准确。我们还估算了因起始时间记录不准确而造成的收入损失。方法 研究对象是以周围神经阻滞作为主要麻醉方式的手术患者。在本次分析中,在手术室时间之前 10 分钟内发生的 "开始 "时间被定义为可能不准确。潜在收入损失根据记录的局麻药给药时间与记录的 A 开始时间之间的差值进行估算。结果 共分析了 745 个病例。总体而言,有 439 个病例(58%)的开始时间可能不准确。与室内麻醉主治医师监督的阻滞相比,阻滞小组记录的 A 开始时间不准确的比例更高(316/482,65.5%)(123/263,46.7%,p<0.001)。总体而言,在研究期间,估计共损失了 70 265 美元的计费收入。结论 由阻滞小组实施初级区域麻醉手术增加了不准确记录的发生率和未捕获的潜在收入。有必要对麻醉医生进行有关神经阻滞准确记录的教育,尤其是在使用独立团队的情况下。暂无数据。
Anesthesia start time documentation accuracy where peripheral nerve block is the primary anesthetic
Introduction When used as the primary anesthetic, nerve blocks are not billed as separate procedures. In this scenario, the anesthesia start (A Start ) time should include the block procedural time. We measured how often A Start time was documented before the nerve block was placed in the preoperative area, and compared cases where a block team performed the nerve block and cases where the intraoperative anesthesia attending supervised the nerve block. We hypothesized that the involvement of a regional anesthesia team would lead to more accurate documentation of A Start . We also estimated the lost revenue due to inaccurate start time documentation. Methods The study population were patients undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block as the primary anesthetic. For this analysis, A Start occurring less than 10 min before the in-operating room time was defined as potentially inaccurate. Lost potential revenue was estimated by taking the difference between the documented time of local anesthetic administration and the documented A Start time. Results A total of 745 cases were analyzed. Overall, 439 cases (58%) cases were identified as having potentially inaccurate start times. There were higher rates of inaccurate A Start documentation by the block team (316/482, 65.5%) compared with blocks supervised by the in-room anesthesia attendings (123/263, 46.7%, p<0.001). Overall, the estimated loss in billable revenue during the study period was a total of $70 265. Conclusions The performance of primary regional anesthesia procedure by a block team increased the incidence of inaccurate documentation and uncaptured potential revenue. There is need for education about accurate nerve block documentation for anesthesiologists, especially when separate teams are used. No data are available.