一项I期试验,评估向服用鲁索利替尼和甲泼尼龙治疗后病情进展的复发性/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者加用来那度胺的效果

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
James R. Berenson, Andrea Limon, Stephanie Rice, Tahmineh Safaie, Ralph Boccia, Honghao Yang, Mehdi Moezi, Stephen Lim, Gary Schwartz, Shahrooz Eshaghian, Matthew Brobeck, Regina Swift, Benjamin M. Eades, Sean Bujarski, Yohana Sebhat, Rudra Ray, Susanna Kim, Ashley Del Dosso, Robert Vescio
{"title":"一项I期试验,评估向服用鲁索利替尼和甲泼尼龙治疗后病情进展的复发性/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者加用来那度胺的效果","authors":"James R. Berenson, Andrea Limon, Stephanie Rice, Tahmineh Safaie, Ralph Boccia, Honghao Yang, Mehdi Moezi, Stephen Lim, Gary Schwartz, Shahrooz Eshaghian, Matthew Brobeck, Regina Swift, Benjamin M. Eades, Sean Bujarski, Yohana Sebhat, Rudra Ray, Susanna Kim, Ashley Del Dosso, Robert Vescio","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01049-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Ruxolitinib (RUX), an orally administered selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, has received approval for the treatment of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and graft-versus-host disease. We have previously demonstrated the anti-multiple myeloma effects of RUX alone and in combination with the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide (LEN) and glucocorticosteroids both pre-clinically and clinically.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate whether LEN can achieve clinical activity among patients with multiple myeloma progressing on the combination of RUX and methylprednisolone (MP).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In this part of a phase I, multicenter, open-label study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of RUX and MP for patients with multiple myeloma with progressive disease who had previously received a proteasome inhibitor, LEN, glucocorticosteroids, and at least three prior regimens; we also determined the safety and efficacy of adding LEN at the time of disease progression from the initial doublet treatment. Initially, all subjects received oral RUX 15 mg twice daily and oral MP 40 mg every other day. Those patients who developed progressive disease according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria then received LEN 10 mg once daily on days 1–21 within a 28-day cycle in addition to RUX and MP, which were administered at the same doses these patients were receiving at the time progressive disease developed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Twenty-nine subjects (median age 64 years; 18 [62%] male) were enrolled in this part of the study and initially received the two-drug combination of RUX and MP. The median number of prior therapies was six (range 3–12). The overall response rate from this two-drug combination was 31% and the clinical benefit rate was 34%. The best responses were 1 very good partial response, 8 partial responses, 1 minor response, 12 stable disease, and 7 progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (range 0.5–36.2 months). The median time to response was 3.0 months. The median duration of response was 12.5 months (range 2.8–36.2 months). Twenty (69%) patients who showed progressive disease had LEN added to RUX and MP; all patients had prior exposure to LEN and all but one patient was refractory to their last LEN-containing regimen. After the addition of LEN, the overall response rate was 30% and the clinical benefit rate was 40%. The best responses of patients following the addition of LEN were 2 very good partial responses, 4 partial responses, 2 minor responses, 8 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. The median time to response was 2.6 months (range 0.7–15.0 months). The median duration of response was not reached. The median progression-free survival following the addition of LEN was 3.5 months (range 0.3–25.9 months).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>For patients with multiple myeloma, treatment with RUX and MP is effective and well tolerated, and LEN can be used to extend the benefit of this RUX-based treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Clinical Trial Registration</h3><p>This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03110822, and is ongoing.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Phase I Trial Evaluating the Addition of Lenalidomide to Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Progressing on Ruxolitinib and Methylprednisolone\",\"authors\":\"James R. Berenson, Andrea Limon, Stephanie Rice, Tahmineh Safaie, Ralph Boccia, Honghao Yang, Mehdi Moezi, Stephen Lim, Gary Schwartz, Shahrooz Eshaghian, Matthew Brobeck, Regina Swift, Benjamin M. Eades, Sean Bujarski, Yohana Sebhat, Rudra Ray, Susanna Kim, Ashley Del Dosso, Robert Vescio\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11523-024-01049-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Ruxolitinib (RUX), an orally administered selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, has received approval for the treatment of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and graft-versus-host disease. We have previously demonstrated the anti-multiple myeloma effects of RUX alone and in combination with the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide (LEN) and glucocorticosteroids both pre-clinically and clinically.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objective</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate whether LEN can achieve clinical activity among patients with multiple myeloma progressing on the combination of RUX and methylprednisolone (MP).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>In this part of a phase I, multicenter, open-label study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of RUX and MP for patients with multiple myeloma with progressive disease who had previously received a proteasome inhibitor, LEN, glucocorticosteroids, and at least three prior regimens; we also determined the safety and efficacy of adding LEN at the time of disease progression from the initial doublet treatment. Initially, all subjects received oral RUX 15 mg twice daily and oral MP 40 mg every other day. Those patients who developed progressive disease according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria then received LEN 10 mg once daily on days 1–21 within a 28-day cycle in addition to RUX and MP, which were administered at the same doses these patients were receiving at the time progressive disease developed.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Twenty-nine subjects (median age 64 years; 18 [62%] male) were enrolled in this part of the study and initially received the two-drug combination of RUX and MP. The median number of prior therapies was six (range 3–12). The overall response rate from this two-drug combination was 31% and the clinical benefit rate was 34%. The best responses were 1 very good partial response, 8 partial responses, 1 minor response, 12 stable disease, and 7 progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (range 0.5–36.2 months). The median time to response was 3.0 months. The median duration of response was 12.5 months (range 2.8–36.2 months). Twenty (69%) patients who showed progressive disease had LEN added to RUX and MP; all patients had prior exposure to LEN and all but one patient was refractory to their last LEN-containing regimen. After the addition of LEN, the overall response rate was 30% and the clinical benefit rate was 40%. The best responses of patients following the addition of LEN were 2 very good partial responses, 4 partial responses, 2 minor responses, 8 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. The median time to response was 2.6 months (range 0.7–15.0 months). The median duration of response was not reached. The median progression-free survival following the addition of LEN was 3.5 months (range 0.3–25.9 months).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>For patients with multiple myeloma, treatment with RUX and MP is effective and well tolerated, and LEN can be used to extend the benefit of this RUX-based treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Clinical Trial Registration</h3><p>This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03110822, and is ongoing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Targeted Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Targeted Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01049-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01049-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景Ruxolitinib(RUX)是一种口服选择性Janus激酶1/2抑制剂,已获准用于治疗骨髓纤维化、真性红细胞增多症和移植物抗宿主病。我们曾在临床前和临床上证实了RUX单独使用以及与免疫调节剂来那度胺(LEN)和糖皮质激素联合使用的抗多发性骨髓瘤效果。本研究旨在评估来那度胺能否在联合使用RUX和甲基强的松龙(MP)的进展期多发性骨髓瘤患者中发挥临床活性。方法在这项I期、多中心、开放标签研究的这一部分,我们评估了RUX和MP对既往接受过蛋白酶体抑制剂、LEN、糖皮质激素和至少三种既往治疗方案的疾病进展期多发性骨髓瘤患者的安全性和有效性;我们还确定了在初始双联治疗后疾病进展时加入LEN的安全性和有效性。最初,所有受试者均接受口服 RUX 15 毫克,每天两次,以及口服 MP 40 毫克,隔天一次。然后,根据国际骨髓瘤工作组的标准,病情进展的患者在28天周期内的第1-21天除了接受RUX和MP治疗外,还接受LEN治疗,每天一次,每次10毫克,剂量与患者病情进展时的剂量相同。之前接受过的治疗次数中位数为 6 次(3-12 次不等)。这种两药联合疗法的总体反应率为31%,临床获益率为34%。最佳反应为1例非常好的部分反应、8例部分反应、1例轻微反应、12例病情稳定和7例病情进展。无进展生存期中位数为3.5个月(0.5-36.2个月)。中位应答时间为 3.0 个月。中位应答持续时间为 12.5 个月(2.8-36.2 个月)。20名(69%)病情进展的患者在RUX和MP基础上加用了LEN;所有患者之前都曾接受过LEN治疗,除一名患者外,其他患者都对上一次含LEN的治疗方案产生了难治性。添加 LEN 后,总体反应率为 30%,临床获益率为 40%。添加 LEN 后,患者的最佳反应为:2 例非常好的部分反应、4 例部分反应、2 例轻微反应、8 例病情稳定和 4 例病情进展。中位应答时间为 2.6 个月(0.7-15.0 个月)。未达到中位应答持续时间。结论对于多发性骨髓瘤患者,RUX和MP治疗有效且耐受性良好,LEN可用于延长这种基于RUX治疗的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Phase I Trial Evaluating the Addition of Lenalidomide to Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Progressing on Ruxolitinib and Methylprednisolone

A Phase I Trial Evaluating the Addition of Lenalidomide to Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Progressing on Ruxolitinib and Methylprednisolone

Background

Ruxolitinib (RUX), an orally administered selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, has received approval for the treatment of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and graft-versus-host disease. We have previously demonstrated the anti-multiple myeloma effects of RUX alone and in combination with the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide (LEN) and glucocorticosteroids both pre-clinically and clinically.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate whether LEN can achieve clinical activity among patients with multiple myeloma progressing on the combination of RUX and methylprednisolone (MP).

Methods

In this part of a phase I, multicenter, open-label study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of RUX and MP for patients with multiple myeloma with progressive disease who had previously received a proteasome inhibitor, LEN, glucocorticosteroids, and at least three prior regimens; we also determined the safety and efficacy of adding LEN at the time of disease progression from the initial doublet treatment. Initially, all subjects received oral RUX 15 mg twice daily and oral MP 40 mg every other day. Those patients who developed progressive disease according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria then received LEN 10 mg once daily on days 1–21 within a 28-day cycle in addition to RUX and MP, which were administered at the same doses these patients were receiving at the time progressive disease developed.

Results

Twenty-nine subjects (median age 64 years; 18 [62%] male) were enrolled in this part of the study and initially received the two-drug combination of RUX and MP. The median number of prior therapies was six (range 3–12). The overall response rate from this two-drug combination was 31% and the clinical benefit rate was 34%. The best responses were 1 very good partial response, 8 partial responses, 1 minor response, 12 stable disease, and 7 progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (range 0.5–36.2 months). The median time to response was 3.0 months. The median duration of response was 12.5 months (range 2.8–36.2 months). Twenty (69%) patients who showed progressive disease had LEN added to RUX and MP; all patients had prior exposure to LEN and all but one patient was refractory to their last LEN-containing regimen. After the addition of LEN, the overall response rate was 30% and the clinical benefit rate was 40%. The best responses of patients following the addition of LEN were 2 very good partial responses, 4 partial responses, 2 minor responses, 8 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. The median time to response was 2.6 months (range 0.7–15.0 months). The median duration of response was not reached. The median progression-free survival following the addition of LEN was 3.5 months (range 0.3–25.9 months).

Conclusions

For patients with multiple myeloma, treatment with RUX and MP is effective and well tolerated, and LEN can be used to extend the benefit of this RUX-based treatment.

Clinical Trial Registration

This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03110822, and is ongoing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Targeted Oncology
Targeted Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes: Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches. Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways. Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective. Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations. Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信