急性缺血性脑卒中恶性脑水肿的治疗

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Maximiliano A. Hawkes, Alejandro A. Rabinstein
{"title":"急性缺血性脑卒中恶性脑水肿的治疗","authors":"Maximiliano A. Hawkes, Alejandro A. Rabinstein","doi":"10.1007/s11940-024-00793-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of review</h3><p>To provide an updated summary on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with malignant cerebral edema after ischemic stroke.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent findings</h3><p>The risk of malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke is highest in young patients with large vessel occlusion and unsuccessful revascularization. Several scores are available for risk stratification. Treatment includes supportive care, close neurologic monitoring, and hyperosmolar therapy. Yet, the main therapeutic decision is whether to proceed with decompressive craniectomy. Multiple randomized clinical trials and several meta-analyses have demonstrated that decompressive hemicraniectomy is the single most important intervention associated with survival. Survivors may face severe disability regardless of surgical treatment, and the definition of acceptable outcome in this context remains elusive.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>Malignant MCA infarcts are life-threatening and invariably cause disability, most often severe. Neurologic deterioration requires airway management and hyperosmolar therapy. Decompressive hemicraniectomy is a lifesaving procedure; approximately 50% of surgically treated patients younger than 60 years can regain independent ambulation, and one nearly in five may become functionally independent at 1 year. Older patients face a much worse functional prognosis; surgical decisions in these patients should be assessed case by case.</p>","PeriodicalId":10975,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Neurology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of Malignant Cerebral Edema in Acute Ischemic Stroke\",\"authors\":\"Maximiliano A. Hawkes, Alejandro A. Rabinstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11940-024-00793-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose of review</h3><p>To provide an updated summary on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with malignant cerebral edema after ischemic stroke.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Recent findings</h3><p>The risk of malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke is highest in young patients with large vessel occlusion and unsuccessful revascularization. Several scores are available for risk stratification. Treatment includes supportive care, close neurologic monitoring, and hyperosmolar therapy. Yet, the main therapeutic decision is whether to proceed with decompressive craniectomy. Multiple randomized clinical trials and several meta-analyses have demonstrated that decompressive hemicraniectomy is the single most important intervention associated with survival. Survivors may face severe disability regardless of surgical treatment, and the definition of acceptable outcome in this context remains elusive.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Summary</h3><p>Malignant MCA infarcts are life-threatening and invariably cause disability, most often severe. Neurologic deterioration requires airway management and hyperosmolar therapy. Decompressive hemicraniectomy is a lifesaving procedure; approximately 50% of surgically treated patients younger than 60 years can regain independent ambulation, and one nearly in five may become functionally independent at 1 year. Older patients face a much worse functional prognosis; surgical decisions in these patients should be assessed case by case.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Treatment Options in Neurology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Treatment Options in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-024-00793-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-024-00793-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最新研究结果在大血管闭塞和血管再通不成功的年轻患者中,恶性大脑中动脉(MCA)卒中的风险最高。有几种评分方法可用于风险分层。治疗包括支持性护理、密切的神经监测和高渗治疗。然而,治疗的主要决定因素是是否进行颅骨减压切除术。多项随机临床试验和数项荟萃分析表明,减压性半颅骨切除术是与存活率相关的最重要干预措施。无论手术治疗与否,幸存者都可能面临严重残疾,在这种情况下,可接受结果的定义仍然难以确定。摘要 恶性 MCA 梗死危及生命,必然导致残疾,通常是严重残疾。神经系统恶化需要气道管理和高渗治疗。减压性半颅骨切除术是一种挽救生命的手术;在接受过手术治疗的 60 岁以下患者中,约有 50% 的患者可以重新独立行走,近五分之一的患者可以在 1 年后实现功能独立。高龄患者的功能预后要差得多;对这些患者的手术决定应根据具体情况进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Treatment of Malignant Cerebral Edema in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Treatment of Malignant Cerebral Edema in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Purpose of review

To provide an updated summary on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with malignant cerebral edema after ischemic stroke.

Recent findings

The risk of malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke is highest in young patients with large vessel occlusion and unsuccessful revascularization. Several scores are available for risk stratification. Treatment includes supportive care, close neurologic monitoring, and hyperosmolar therapy. Yet, the main therapeutic decision is whether to proceed with decompressive craniectomy. Multiple randomized clinical trials and several meta-analyses have demonstrated that decompressive hemicraniectomy is the single most important intervention associated with survival. Survivors may face severe disability regardless of surgical treatment, and the definition of acceptable outcome in this context remains elusive.

Summary

Malignant MCA infarcts are life-threatening and invariably cause disability, most often severe. Neurologic deterioration requires airway management and hyperosmolar therapy. Decompressive hemicraniectomy is a lifesaving procedure; approximately 50% of surgically treated patients younger than 60 years can regain independent ambulation, and one nearly in five may become functionally independent at 1 year. Older patients face a much worse functional prognosis; surgical decisions in these patients should be assessed case by case.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published treatment option advances in the field of neurology. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to facilitate worldwide approaches to the treatment of neurologic conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as epilepsy, headache, neurologic ophthalmology and otology, neuromuscular disorders, psychiatric manifestations of neurologic disease, and sleep disorders. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known neurologists, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信