相同的地貌,不同的连通性:山区两种同域有蹄类动物基因流动的对比模式

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Roberta Lecis, Roberta Chirichella, Olivia Dondina, Valerio Orioli, Silvia Azzu, Antonio Canu, Elisa Torretta, Luciano Bani, Marco Apollonio, Massimo Scandura
{"title":"相同的地貌,不同的连通性:山区两种同域有蹄类动物基因流动的对比模式","authors":"Roberta Lecis, Roberta Chirichella, Olivia Dondina, Valerio Orioli, Silvia Azzu, Antonio Canu, Elisa Torretta, Luciano Bani, Marco Apollonio, Massimo Scandura","doi":"10.1007/s10344-024-01796-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Comparative landscape genetics studies provide insights on the impact of landscape elements on gene flow patterns of different species inhabiting the same geographic area. We investigated the population genetic structure of two sympatric ungulates, roe deer <i>Capreolus capreolus</i> and Northern chamois <i>Rupicapra rupicapra</i>, in a mountain area of the central Italian Alps (Trentino, northern Italy). A total of 122 chamois and 72 roe deer samples were genotyped by two species-specific panels of 11 polymorphic microsatellite loci and analyzed by aspatial and spatially explicit analyses. While the roe deer population resulted unstructured, a clear population structure was detected in chamois, with two main groups, one inhabiting the eastern and the other spread in the western part of the study area. Landscape genetics analysis confirmed these scenarios and revealed a different effect of landscape on gene flow. An IBD (Isolation-By-Distance) model best explained genetic variation in roe deer, while IBR (Isolation-By-Resistance) was found as the process underlying genetic variation patterns in chamois, suggesting arable lands, coniferous forests, watercourses, and main roads as potential barriers. Species distribution and landscape use might explain these results: roe deer mostly occupy valley floors relatively connected to each other, and their spatial behavior may promote gene flow across areas. On the other hand, chamois prefer higher elevations and their movements may be hindered by valleys, rivers, and road networks. This study highlights the different impacts of natural and anthropic landscape elements on gene flow in two sympatric species, resulting from their different ecological requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Same landscape, different connectivity: contrasting patterns of gene flow in two sympatric ungulates in a mountain area\",\"authors\":\"Roberta Lecis, Roberta Chirichella, Olivia Dondina, Valerio Orioli, Silvia Azzu, Antonio Canu, Elisa Torretta, Luciano Bani, Marco Apollonio, Massimo Scandura\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10344-024-01796-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Comparative landscape genetics studies provide insights on the impact of landscape elements on gene flow patterns of different species inhabiting the same geographic area. We investigated the population genetic structure of two sympatric ungulates, roe deer <i>Capreolus capreolus</i> and Northern chamois <i>Rupicapra rupicapra</i>, in a mountain area of the central Italian Alps (Trentino, northern Italy). A total of 122 chamois and 72 roe deer samples were genotyped by two species-specific panels of 11 polymorphic microsatellite loci and analyzed by aspatial and spatially explicit analyses. While the roe deer population resulted unstructured, a clear population structure was detected in chamois, with two main groups, one inhabiting the eastern and the other spread in the western part of the study area. Landscape genetics analysis confirmed these scenarios and revealed a different effect of landscape on gene flow. An IBD (Isolation-By-Distance) model best explained genetic variation in roe deer, while IBR (Isolation-By-Resistance) was found as the process underlying genetic variation patterns in chamois, suggesting arable lands, coniferous forests, watercourses, and main roads as potential barriers. Species distribution and landscape use might explain these results: roe deer mostly occupy valley floors relatively connected to each other, and their spatial behavior may promote gene flow across areas. On the other hand, chamois prefer higher elevations and their movements may be hindered by valleys, rivers, and road networks. This study highlights the different impacts of natural and anthropic landscape elements on gene flow in two sympatric species, resulting from their different ecological requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01796-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01796-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较景观遗传学研究有助于深入了解景观要素对栖息在同一地理区域的不同物种基因流动模式的影响。我们调查了意大利阿尔卑斯山中部山区(意大利北部特伦蒂诺)两种同域有蹄类动物--狍子和北麂的种群遗传结构。研究人员对 122 头麂子和 72 头狍子样本进行了由 11 个多态性微卫星位点组成的两个物种特异性面板基因分型,并进行了空间分析和空间显式分析。结果显示,狍子的种群结构并不稳定,而麂子的种群结构则很清晰,主要有两个群体,一个栖息在研究区的东部,另一个分布在西部。景观遗传学分析证实了这些情况,并揭示了景观对基因流动的不同影响。IBD(Isolation-By-Distance)模型最能解释狍子的基因变异,而IBR(Isolation-By-Resistance)模型则是麂子基因变异模式的基础,表明耕地、针叶林、水道和主要道路是潜在的障碍。物种分布和景观利用可能可以解释这些结果:狍子大多占据彼此相对相连的谷底,它们的空间行为可能会促进跨区域的基因流动。另一方面,麂子喜欢海拔较高的地方,它们的活动可能会受到山谷、河流和道路网络的阻碍。这项研究强调了自然和人为景观因素对两种同域物种基因流动的不同影响,这是由它们不同的生态要求造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Same landscape, different connectivity: contrasting patterns of gene flow in two sympatric ungulates in a mountain area

Same landscape, different connectivity: contrasting patterns of gene flow in two sympatric ungulates in a mountain area

Comparative landscape genetics studies provide insights on the impact of landscape elements on gene flow patterns of different species inhabiting the same geographic area. We investigated the population genetic structure of two sympatric ungulates, roe deer Capreolus capreolus and Northern chamois Rupicapra rupicapra, in a mountain area of the central Italian Alps (Trentino, northern Italy). A total of 122 chamois and 72 roe deer samples were genotyped by two species-specific panels of 11 polymorphic microsatellite loci and analyzed by aspatial and spatially explicit analyses. While the roe deer population resulted unstructured, a clear population structure was detected in chamois, with two main groups, one inhabiting the eastern and the other spread in the western part of the study area. Landscape genetics analysis confirmed these scenarios and revealed a different effect of landscape on gene flow. An IBD (Isolation-By-Distance) model best explained genetic variation in roe deer, while IBR (Isolation-By-Resistance) was found as the process underlying genetic variation patterns in chamois, suggesting arable lands, coniferous forests, watercourses, and main roads as potential barriers. Species distribution and landscape use might explain these results: roe deer mostly occupy valley floors relatively connected to each other, and their spatial behavior may promote gene flow across areas. On the other hand, chamois prefer higher elevations and their movements may be hindered by valleys, rivers, and road networks. This study highlights the different impacts of natural and anthropic landscape elements on gene flow in two sympatric species, resulting from their different ecological requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信