新的自由对流层湍流方案对大气示踪剂扩散影响的案例研究分析

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Andrew K. Mirza, Helen F. Dacre, Chun Hay Brian Lo
{"title":"新的自由对流层湍流方案对大气示踪剂扩散影响的案例研究分析","authors":"Andrew K. Mirza, Helen F. Dacre, Chun Hay Brian Lo","doi":"10.1002/qj.4681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most Lagrangian dispersion models represent free tropospheric turbulence as a homogeneous steady‐state process. However, intermittent turbulent mixing in the free troposphere may be a significant source of mixing. We test a new parametrization scheme that represents spatial‐ and temporal‐varying turbulence in the free troposphere in the Met Office's Numerical Atmospheric‐dispersion Modelling Environment. We use semi‐idealized emissions of radon‐222 (Rn) from rocks and soil in the United Kingdom to evaluate the impact of using a variable free tropospheric turbulence parameterization on the dispersion of Rn. We performed two experiments, the first using the existing steady‐state scheme and the second using the newly implemented spatio‐temporal‐varying scheme, for two case periods July 2018 and April 2021. We find that the turbulence in the varying scheme (represented by the vertical velocity variance) can range by two to three orders of magnitude (10 to 10 m s) when compared with the steady‐state scheme (10 m s). In particular, low‐altitude turbulence is enhanced when synoptic conditions are conducive to forming low‐level jets. This leads to a greater dispersion in the free troposphere, reducing the mean monthly Rn concentration above the boundary layer by 20–40% relative to the steady‐state scheme. We conclude that without a space–time‐varying free tropospheric turbulence scheme atmospheric dispersion may be significantly underestimated under synoptic conditions that are favourable for low‐level jet formation. This underestimation of dispersion may potentially result in inaccurate estimations of local emissions in top‐down greenhouse gas inventory studies.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A case study analysis of the impact of a new free tropospheric turbulence scheme on the dispersion of an atmospheric tracer\",\"authors\":\"Andrew K. Mirza, Helen F. Dacre, Chun Hay Brian Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/qj.4681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most Lagrangian dispersion models represent free tropospheric turbulence as a homogeneous steady‐state process. However, intermittent turbulent mixing in the free troposphere may be a significant source of mixing. We test a new parametrization scheme that represents spatial‐ and temporal‐varying turbulence in the free troposphere in the Met Office's Numerical Atmospheric‐dispersion Modelling Environment. We use semi‐idealized emissions of radon‐222 (Rn) from rocks and soil in the United Kingdom to evaluate the impact of using a variable free tropospheric turbulence parameterization on the dispersion of Rn. We performed two experiments, the first using the existing steady‐state scheme and the second using the newly implemented spatio‐temporal‐varying scheme, for two case periods July 2018 and April 2021. We find that the turbulence in the varying scheme (represented by the vertical velocity variance) can range by two to three orders of magnitude (10 to 10 m s) when compared with the steady‐state scheme (10 m s). In particular, low‐altitude turbulence is enhanced when synoptic conditions are conducive to forming low‐level jets. This leads to a greater dispersion in the free troposphere, reducing the mean monthly Rn concentration above the boundary layer by 20–40% relative to the steady‐state scheme. We conclude that without a space–time‐varying free tropospheric turbulence scheme atmospheric dispersion may be significantly underestimated under synoptic conditions that are favourable for low‐level jet formation. This underestimation of dispersion may potentially result in inaccurate estimations of local emissions in top‐down greenhouse gas inventory studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4681\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4681","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数拉格朗日弥散模式将自由对流层湍流表示为一个均匀的稳态过程。然而,自由对流层中的间歇性湍流混合可能是混合的一个重要来源。我们测试了一种新的参数化方案,该方案可在气象局的大气扩散数值模拟环境中表示自由对流层中的时空变化湍流。我们利用英国岩石和土壤中氡-222(Rn)的半理想化排放来评估使用可变自由对流层湍流参数化对 Rn 扩散的影响。我们进行了两次实验,第一次使用现有的稳态方案,第二次使用新实施的时空变化方案,分别针对 2018 年 7 月和 2021 年 4 月两个案例期。我们发现,与稳态方案(10 m s)相比,变化方案中的湍流(以垂直速度方差表示)范围可以达到 2 到 3 个数量级(10 到 10 m s)。特别是当合流条件有利于形成低空喷流时,低空湍流会增强。这导致自由对流层的更大弥散,使边界层上方的月平均 Rn 浓度比稳态方案降低了 20-40%。我们的结论是,在有利于低空喷流形成的合流条件下,如果没有时空变化的自由对流层湍流方案,大气弥散可能会被大大低估。这种对扩散的低估可能会导致在自上而下的温室气体清单研究中对当地排放量的不准确估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A case study analysis of the impact of a new free tropospheric turbulence scheme on the dispersion of an atmospheric tracer
Most Lagrangian dispersion models represent free tropospheric turbulence as a homogeneous steady‐state process. However, intermittent turbulent mixing in the free troposphere may be a significant source of mixing. We test a new parametrization scheme that represents spatial‐ and temporal‐varying turbulence in the free troposphere in the Met Office's Numerical Atmospheric‐dispersion Modelling Environment. We use semi‐idealized emissions of radon‐222 (Rn) from rocks and soil in the United Kingdom to evaluate the impact of using a variable free tropospheric turbulence parameterization on the dispersion of Rn. We performed two experiments, the first using the existing steady‐state scheme and the second using the newly implemented spatio‐temporal‐varying scheme, for two case periods July 2018 and April 2021. We find that the turbulence in the varying scheme (represented by the vertical velocity variance) can range by two to three orders of magnitude (10 to 10 m s) when compared with the steady‐state scheme (10 m s). In particular, low‐altitude turbulence is enhanced when synoptic conditions are conducive to forming low‐level jets. This leads to a greater dispersion in the free troposphere, reducing the mean monthly Rn concentration above the boundary layer by 20–40% relative to the steady‐state scheme. We conclude that without a space–time‐varying free tropospheric turbulence scheme atmospheric dispersion may be significantly underestimated under synoptic conditions that are favourable for low‐level jet formation. This underestimation of dispersion may potentially result in inaccurate estimations of local emissions in top‐down greenhouse gas inventory studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues. The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信