如果我们 "烧光所有的碳 "会发生什么? 碳储备、碳预算和政府的政策选择†。

IF 2.8 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kevin M. A. Parker and Michael R. Mainelli
{"title":"如果我们 \"烧光所有的碳 \"会发生什么? 碳储备、碳预算和政府的政策选择†。","authors":"Kevin M. A. Parker and Michael R. Mainelli","doi":"10.1039/D3EA00107E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Our estimates show that ‘proven reserves’ of fossil fuels in 2022, would generate an estimated 4777 Gt of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> after allowing for non-fuel uses. This quantity already could ‘bust CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> budgets’ for IPCC RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP6.0 and is approaching the range for RCP8.5. Notwithstanding these results, fossil fuel companies are still exploring and bringing new reserves onstream. We discuss the reasons behind this, and propose some policy options for governments as they address this situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72942,"journal":{"name":"Environmental science: atmospheres","volume":" 4","pages":" 435-454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ea/d3ea00107e?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What happens if we ‘burn all the carbon’? carbon reserves, carbon budgets, and policy options for governments†\",\"authors\":\"Kevin M. A. Parker and Michael R. Mainelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D3EA00107E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Our estimates show that ‘proven reserves’ of fossil fuels in 2022, would generate an estimated 4777 Gt of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> after allowing for non-fuel uses. This quantity already could ‘bust CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> budgets’ for IPCC RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP6.0 and is approaching the range for RCP8.5. Notwithstanding these results, fossil fuel companies are still exploring and bringing new reserves onstream. We discuss the reasons behind this, and propose some policy options for governments as they address this situation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental science: atmospheres\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\" 435-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ea/d3ea00107e?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental science: atmospheres\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ea/d3ea00107e\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental science: atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ea/d3ea00107e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的估算显示,2022 年化石燃料的 "探明储量 "在考虑非燃料用途后,估计将产生 4777 千兆吨二氧化碳。这一数量已经可以 "打破 "IPCC RCP2.6、RCP4.5 和 RCP6.0 的二氧化碳预算,并接近 RCP8.5 的范围。尽管得出了这些结果,化石燃料公司仍在勘探和开采新的储量。我们讨论了这背后的原因,并为政府应对这种情况提出了一些政策选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What happens if we ‘burn all the carbon’? carbon reserves, carbon budgets, and policy options for governments†

What happens if we ‘burn all the carbon’? carbon reserves, carbon budgets, and policy options for governments†

Our estimates show that ‘proven reserves’ of fossil fuels in 2022, would generate an estimated 4777 Gt of CO2 after allowing for non-fuel uses. This quantity already could ‘bust CO2 budgets’ for IPCC RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP6.0 and is approaching the range for RCP8.5. Notwithstanding these results, fossil fuel companies are still exploring and bringing new reserves onstream. We discuss the reasons behind this, and propose some policy options for governments as they address this situation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信