植物保护产品在环境空气中的浓度:为综合空气浓度数据库和相关风险评估收集数据

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Anne-Kim Vinck , Edgars Felkers , Michel Urtizberea , Nicola J. Hewitt , Kathrin Bürling , Alistair Morriss
{"title":"植物保护产品在环境空气中的浓度:为综合空气浓度数据库和相关风险评估收集数据","authors":"Anne-Kim Vinck ,&nbsp;Edgars Felkers ,&nbsp;Michel Urtizberea ,&nbsp;Nicola J. Hewitt ,&nbsp;Kathrin Bürling ,&nbsp;Alistair Morriss","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>CropLife Europe collected literature values from monitoring studies measuring air concentrations of Plant Protection Products (PPPs) that may be inhaled by humans located in rural areas but not immediately adjacent to PPP applications. The resulting “Combined Air Concentration Database” (CACD) was used to determine whether air concentrations of PPPs reported by the French “Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health &amp; Safety” (ANSES) are consistent with those measured by others to increase confidence in values of exposure to humans. The results were put into risk assessment context. Results show that 25–90% of samples do not contain measurable PPP concentrations. Measured respirable fractions were below EU default air concentrations used for risk assessment for resident exposure by the European Food Safety Authority. All measured exposures in the CACD were also below established toxicological endpoints, even when considering the highest maximum average reported concentrations and very conservative inhalation rates. The highest recorded air concentration was for prosulfocarb (0.696 μg/m³ measured over 48 h) which is below the EFSA default limit of 1 μg/m³ for low volatility substances. In conclusion, based on the CACD, measured air concentrations of PPPs are significantly lower than EFSA default limits and relevant toxicological reference values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 105627"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000680/pdfft?md5=c8cef965a8eaa646cbc692971fc119a4&pid=1-s2.0-S0273230024000680-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambient air concentrations of plant protection products: Data collection for the combined air concentration database and associated risk assessment\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Kim Vinck ,&nbsp;Edgars Felkers ,&nbsp;Michel Urtizberea ,&nbsp;Nicola J. Hewitt ,&nbsp;Kathrin Bürling ,&nbsp;Alistair Morriss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>CropLife Europe collected literature values from monitoring studies measuring air concentrations of Plant Protection Products (PPPs) that may be inhaled by humans located in rural areas but not immediately adjacent to PPP applications. The resulting “Combined Air Concentration Database” (CACD) was used to determine whether air concentrations of PPPs reported by the French “Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health &amp; Safety” (ANSES) are consistent with those measured by others to increase confidence in values of exposure to humans. The results were put into risk assessment context. Results show that 25–90% of samples do not contain measurable PPP concentrations. Measured respirable fractions were below EU default air concentrations used for risk assessment for resident exposure by the European Food Safety Authority. All measured exposures in the CACD were also below established toxicological endpoints, even when considering the highest maximum average reported concentrations and very conservative inhalation rates. The highest recorded air concentration was for prosulfocarb (0.696 μg/m³ measured over 48 h) which is below the EFSA default limit of 1 μg/m³ for low volatility substances. In conclusion, based on the CACD, measured air concentrations of PPPs are significantly lower than EFSA default limits and relevant toxicological reference values.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"149 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000680/pdfft?md5=c8cef965a8eaa646cbc692971fc119a4&pid=1-s2.0-S0273230024000680-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000680\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲作物生命协会收集了来自监测研究的文献值,这些监测研究测量了位于农村地区但不紧邻植物保护产品应用场所的人类可能吸入的植物保护产品 (PPP) 在空气中的浓度。由此产生的 "综合空气浓度数据库"(CACD)被用于确定法国 "食品、环境和职业健康安全署"(ANSES)报告的空气中的植保产品浓度是否与其他机构测量的浓度一致,以增加人类暴露值的可信度。这些结果已纳入风险评估范畴。结果显示,25%-90% 的样本不含可测量的 PPP 浓度。测得的可吸入组分低于欧洲食品安全局用于居民接触风险评估的欧盟默认空气浓度。即使考虑到报告的最高平均浓度和非常保守的吸入率,CACD 中所有测得的暴露量也低于既定的毒理学终点。所记录的最高空气浓度为丙硫克百威(48小时测量值为0.696 μg/m³),低于欧洲食品安全局对低挥发性物质的默认限值1 μg/m³。总之,根据 CACD,测得的空气中持久性有机污染物浓度大大低于欧洲食品安全局的默认限值和相关毒理学参考值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ambient air concentrations of plant protection products: Data collection for the combined air concentration database and associated risk assessment

CropLife Europe collected literature values from monitoring studies measuring air concentrations of Plant Protection Products (PPPs) that may be inhaled by humans located in rural areas but not immediately adjacent to PPP applications. The resulting “Combined Air Concentration Database” (CACD) was used to determine whether air concentrations of PPPs reported by the French “Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety” (ANSES) are consistent with those measured by others to increase confidence in values of exposure to humans. The results were put into risk assessment context. Results show that 25–90% of samples do not contain measurable PPP concentrations. Measured respirable fractions were below EU default air concentrations used for risk assessment for resident exposure by the European Food Safety Authority. All measured exposures in the CACD were also below established toxicological endpoints, even when considering the highest maximum average reported concentrations and very conservative inhalation rates. The highest recorded air concentration was for prosulfocarb (0.696 μg/m³ measured over 48 h) which is below the EFSA default limit of 1 μg/m³ for low volatility substances. In conclusion, based on the CACD, measured air concentrations of PPPs are significantly lower than EFSA default limits and relevant toxicological reference values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信