急性憩室炎的原发吻合术和憩室环形回肠造口术与哈特曼手术:出院后会发生什么?全国性分析结果

Arturo J. Rios Diaz, Lisa A. Bevilacqua, Theodore E. Habarth-Morales, Alicja Zalewski, David Metcalfe, Caitlyn Costanzo, Charles J. Yeo, Francesco Palazzo
{"title":"急性憩室炎的原发吻合术和憩室环形回肠造口术与哈特曼手术:出院后会发生什么?全国性分析结果","authors":"Arturo J. Rios Diaz, Lisa A. Bevilacqua, Theodore E. Habarth-Morales, Alicja Zalewski, David Metcalfe, Caitlyn Costanzo, Charles J. Yeo, Francesco Palazzo","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10752-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Current guidelines recommend resection with primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy over Hartmann’s procedure if deemed safe for acute diverticulitis. The primary objective of the current study was to compare the utilization of these strategies and describe nationwide ostomy closure patterns and readmission outcomes within 1 year of discharge.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective, population-based, cohort study of United States Hospitals reporting to the Nationwide Readmissions Database from January 2011 to December 2019. There were 35,774 patients identified undergoing non-elective primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy or Hartmann’s procedure for acute diverticulitis. Rates of ostomy closure, unplanned readmissions, and complications were compared. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to control for patient and hospital-level confounders as well as severity of disease.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Of the 35,774 patients identified, 93.5% underwent Hartmann’s procedure. Half (47.2%) were aged 46–65 years, 50.8% female, 41.2% publicly insured, and 91.7% underwent open surgery. Primary anastomosis was associated with higher rates of 1-year ostomy closure (83.6% vs. 53.4%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and shorter time-to-closure [median 72 days (Interquartile range 49–103) vs. 115 (86–160); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]. Primary anastomosis was associated with increased unplanned readmissions [Hazard Ratio = 2.83 (95% Confidence Interval 2.83–3.37); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001], but fewer complications upon stoma closure [Odds Ratio 0.51 (95% 0.42–0.63); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]. There were no differences in complications between primary anastomosis and Hartmann’s procedure during index admission [Odds Ratio = 1.13 (95% Confidence Interval 0.96–1.33); <i>p</i> = 0.137].</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Patients who undergo primary anastomosis for acute diverticulitis are more likely to undergo ostomy reversal and experience fewer postoperative complications upon stoma reversal. These data support the current national guidelines that recommend primary anastomosis in appropriate cases of acute diverticulitis requiring operative treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy vs. Hartmann’s procedure for acute diverticulitis: what happens after discharge? Results of a nationwide analysis\",\"authors\":\"Arturo J. Rios Diaz, Lisa A. Bevilacqua, Theodore E. Habarth-Morales, Alicja Zalewski, David Metcalfe, Caitlyn Costanzo, Charles J. Yeo, Francesco Palazzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-024-10752-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Current guidelines recommend resection with primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy over Hartmann’s procedure if deemed safe for acute diverticulitis. The primary objective of the current study was to compare the utilization of these strategies and describe nationwide ostomy closure patterns and readmission outcomes within 1 year of discharge.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective, population-based, cohort study of United States Hospitals reporting to the Nationwide Readmissions Database from January 2011 to December 2019. There were 35,774 patients identified undergoing non-elective primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy or Hartmann’s procedure for acute diverticulitis. Rates of ostomy closure, unplanned readmissions, and complications were compared. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to control for patient and hospital-level confounders as well as severity of disease.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Of the 35,774 patients identified, 93.5% underwent Hartmann’s procedure. Half (47.2%) were aged 46–65 years, 50.8% female, 41.2% publicly insured, and 91.7% underwent open surgery. Primary anastomosis was associated with higher rates of 1-year ostomy closure (83.6% vs. 53.4%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and shorter time-to-closure [median 72 days (Interquartile range 49–103) vs. 115 (86–160); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]. Primary anastomosis was associated with increased unplanned readmissions [Hazard Ratio = 2.83 (95% Confidence Interval 2.83–3.37); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001], but fewer complications upon stoma closure [Odds Ratio 0.51 (95% 0.42–0.63); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]. There were no differences in complications between primary anastomosis and Hartmann’s procedure during index admission [Odds Ratio = 1.13 (95% Confidence Interval 0.96–1.33); <i>p</i> = 0.137].</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Patients who undergo primary anastomosis for acute diverticulitis are more likely to undergo ostomy reversal and experience fewer postoperative complications upon stoma reversal. These data support the current national guidelines that recommend primary anastomosis in appropriate cases of acute diverticulitis requiring operative treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":501625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10752-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10752-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景目前的指南建议,如果认为治疗急性憩室炎是安全的,则应在切除术的基础上进行吻合术,同时进行分流环回肠造口术,而不是哈特曼手术。本研究的主要目的是比较这些策略的使用情况,并描述全国范围内的造口关闭模式和出院 1 年内的再入院结果。方法这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,研究对象是 2011 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间向全国再入院数据库报告的美国医院。共有 35774 名患者因急性憩室炎接受了非选择性原发吻合术和憩室环状回肠造口术或哈特曼手术。对造口关闭率、非计划再入院率和并发症进行了比较。结果 在35774名患者中,93.5%接受了哈特曼手术。一半(47.2%)的患者年龄在 46-65 岁之间,50.8% 为女性,41.2% 有公共保险,91.7% 接受了开放手术。初次吻合术与较高的造口术 1 年关闭率(83.6% 对 53.4%,P < 0.001)和较短的关闭时间相关[中位 72 天(四分位间范围 49-103 天)对 115 天(86-160 天);P < 0.001]。初次吻合术与非计划再入院率增加有关[危险比 = 2.83(95% 置信区间 2.83-3.37);p < 0.001],但造口关闭时并发症较少[风险比 0.51(95% 0.42-0.63);p < 0.001]。结论因急性憩室炎接受原位吻合术的患者更有可能接受造口翻转术,且造口翻转术后并发症更少。这些数据支持当前的国家指南,该指南建议在需要手术治疗的急性憩室炎的适当病例中进行初次吻合术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy vs. Hartmann’s procedure for acute diverticulitis: what happens after discharge? Results of a nationwide analysis

Background

Current guidelines recommend resection with primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy over Hartmann’s procedure if deemed safe for acute diverticulitis. The primary objective of the current study was to compare the utilization of these strategies and describe nationwide ostomy closure patterns and readmission outcomes within 1 year of discharge.

Methods

This was a retrospective, population-based, cohort study of United States Hospitals reporting to the Nationwide Readmissions Database from January 2011 to December 2019. There were 35,774 patients identified undergoing non-elective primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy or Hartmann’s procedure for acute diverticulitis. Rates of ostomy closure, unplanned readmissions, and complications were compared. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to control for patient and hospital-level confounders as well as severity of disease.

Results

Of the 35,774 patients identified, 93.5% underwent Hartmann’s procedure. Half (47.2%) were aged 46–65 years, 50.8% female, 41.2% publicly insured, and 91.7% underwent open surgery. Primary anastomosis was associated with higher rates of 1-year ostomy closure (83.6% vs. 53.4%, p < 0.001) and shorter time-to-closure [median 72 days (Interquartile range 49–103) vs. 115 (86–160); p < 0.001]. Primary anastomosis was associated with increased unplanned readmissions [Hazard Ratio = 2.83 (95% Confidence Interval 2.83–3.37); p < 0.001], but fewer complications upon stoma closure [Odds Ratio 0.51 (95% 0.42–0.63); p < 0.001]. There were no differences in complications between primary anastomosis and Hartmann’s procedure during index admission [Odds Ratio = 1.13 (95% Confidence Interval 0.96–1.33); p = 0.137].

Conclusion

Patients who undergo primary anastomosis for acute diverticulitis are more likely to undergo ostomy reversal and experience fewer postoperative complications upon stoma reversal. These data support the current national guidelines that recommend primary anastomosis in appropriate cases of acute diverticulitis requiring operative treatment.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信